Literature DB >> 24615859

Risk prediction with machine learning and regression methods.

Ewout W Steyerberg1, Tjeerd van der Ploeg, Ben Van Calster.   

Abstract

This is a discussion of issues in risk prediction based on the following papers: "Probability estimation with machine learning methods for dichotomous and multicategory outcome: Theory" by Jochen Kruppa, Yufeng Liu, Gérard Biau, Michael Kohler, Inke R. König, James D. Malley, and Andreas Ziegler; and "Probability estimation with machine learning methods for dichotomous and multicategory outcome: Applications" by Jochen Kruppa, Yufeng Liu, Hans-Christian Diener, Theresa Holste, Christian Weimar, Inke R. König, and Andreas Ziegler.
© 2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Keywords:  Machine learning; Prediction; Regression

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24615859     DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201300297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biom J        ISSN: 0323-3847            Impact factor:   2.207


  15 in total

1.  A nonparametric updating method to correct clinical prediction model drift.

Authors:  Sharon E Davis; Robert A Greevy; Christopher Fonnesbeck; Thomas A Lasko; Colin G Walsh; Michael E Matheny
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Calibration Drift Among Regression and Machine Learning Models for Hospital Mortality.

Authors:  Sharon E Davis; Thomas A Lasko; Guanhua Chen; Michael E Matheny
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

3.  Prognostic models will be victims of their own success, unless….

Authors:  Matthew C Lenert; Michael E Matheny; Colin G Walsh
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Neurocritical Care: Bench to Bedside (Eds. Claude Hemphill, Michael James) Integrating and Using Big Data in Neurocritical Care.

Authors:  Brandon Foreman
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 7.620

5.  A Machine Learning Classifier Improves Mortality Prediction Compared With Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 Score: Model Development and Validation.

Authors:  Remi D Prince; Alireza Akhondi-Asl; Nilesh M Mehta; Alon Geva
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2021-05-17

Review 6.  Moving beyond regression techniques in cardiovascular risk prediction: applying machine learning to address analytic challenges.

Authors:  Benjamin A Goldstein; Ann Marie Navar; Rickey E Carter
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques for Prediction of Hospitalization in Heart Failure Patients.

Authors:  Giulia Lorenzoni; Stefano Santo Sabato; Corrado Lanera; Daniele Bottigliengo; Clara Minto; Honoria Ocagli; Paola De Paolis; Dario Gregori; Sabino Iliceto; Franco Pisanò
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  A cardiovascular risk prediction model for older people: Development and validation in a primary care population.

Authors:  Emma F van Bussel; Edo Richard; Wim B Busschers; Ewout W Steyerberg; Willem A van Gool; Eric P Moll van Charante; Marieke P Hoevenaar-Blom
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Calibration drift in regression and machine learning models for acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Sharon E Davis; Thomas A Lasko; Guanhua Chen; Edward D Siew; Michael E Matheny
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Cardiovascular risk and aging: the need for a more comprehensive understanding.

Authors:  Ljiljana Trtica Majnarić; Zvonimir Bosnić; Tomislav Kurevija; Thomas Wittlinger
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.189

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.