Literature DB >> 31502962

A Pilot Study of Varying Thoracic and Abdominal Compression in a Reconfigurable Trunk Exoskeleton During Different Activities.

Maja Gorsic, Yubi Regmi, Alwyn P Johnson, Boyi Dai, Domen Novak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Trunk exoskeletons are a new technology with great promise for human rehabilitation, assistance and augmentation. However, it is unclear how different exoskeleton features affect the wearer's body during different activities. This study thus examined how varying a trunk exoskeleton's thoracic and abdominal compression affects trunk kinematics and muscle demand during several activities.
METHODS: We developed a trunk exoskeleton that allows thoracic and abdominal compression to be changed quickly and independently. To evaluate the effect of varying compression, 12 participants took part in a two-session study. In the first session, they performed three activities (walking, sit-to-stand, lifting a box). In the second session, they experienced unexpected perturbations while sitting. This was done both without the exoskeleton and in four exoskeleton configurations with different thoracic and abdominal compression levels. Trunk flexion angle, low back extension moment and the electromyogram of the erector spinae and rectus abdominis were measured in both sessions.
RESULTS: Different exoskeleton compression levels resulted in significantly different peak trunk flexion angles and peak electromyograms of the erector spinae. However, the effects of compression differed significantly between activities.
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that a trunk exoskeleton's thoracic and abdominal compression affect the wearer's kinematics and muscle demand; furthermore, a single compression configuration is not appropriate for all activities. SIGNIFICANCE: The study suggests that future trunk exoskeletons should either be able to vary their compression levels to suit different activities or should have the compression designed for a specific activity in order to be beneficial to the wearer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31502962      PMCID: PMC7335635          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2019.2940431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  21 in total

Review 1.  Non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Federico Balagué; Anne F Mannion; Ferran Pellisé; Christine Cedraschi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians.

Authors:  Amir Qaseem; Timothy J Wilt; Robert M McLean; Mary Ann Forciea; Thomas D Denberg; Michael J Barry; Cynthia Boyd; R Dobbin Chow; Nick Fitterman; Russell P Harris; Linda L Humphrey; Sandeep Vijan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Translational Motion Tracking of Leg Joints for Enhanced Prediction of Walking Tasks.

Authors:  Roman Stolyarov; Gary Burnett; Hugh Herr
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  The effect of a passive trunk exoskeleton on functional performance in healthy individuals.

Authors:  S J Baltrusch; J H van Dieën; C A M van Bennekom; H Houdijk
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  Metabolic Effects Induced by a Kinematically Compatible Hip Exoskeleton During STS.

Authors:  Karen Junius; Nina Lefeber; Eva Swinnen; Bram Vanderborght; Dirk Lefeber
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 6.  Can lumbosacral orthoses cause trunk muscle weakness? A systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Fatemeh Azadinia; Esmaeil Ebrahimi; Mojtaba Kamyab; Mohamad Parnianpour; Jacek Cholewicki; Nader Maroufi
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Assessment of an active industrial exoskeleton to aid dynamic lifting and lowering manual handling tasks.

Authors:  Kirsten Huysamen; Michiel de Looze; Tim Bosch; Jesus Ortiz; Stefano Toxiri; Leonard W O'Sullivan
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.661

8.  Robotic Spine Exoskeleton (RoSE): Characterizing the 3-D Stiffness of the Human Torso in the Treatment of Spine Deformity.

Authors:  Joon-Hyuk Park; Paul R Stegall; David P Roye; Sunil K Agrawal
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  Paul Willems
Journal:  Acta Orthop Suppl       Date:  2013-02

10.  Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  3 in total

1.  Characterizing Human Box-Lifting Behavior Using Wearable Inertial Motion Sensors.

Authors:  Steven D Hlucny; Domen Novak
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Load Position and Weight Classification during Carrying Gait Using Wearable Inertial and Electromyographic Sensors.

Authors:  Maja Goršič; Boyi Dai; Domen Novak
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Evaluation of the HeroWear Apex back-assist exosuit during multiple brief tasks.

Authors:  Maja Goršič; Yu Song; Boyi Dai; Domen Novak
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 2.789

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.