Literature DB >> 29885731

The effect of a passive trunk exoskeleton on functional performance in healthy individuals.

S J Baltrusch1, J H van Dieën2, C A M van Bennekom3, H Houdijk4.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the effect of a passive trunk exoskeleton on functional performance for various work related tasks in healthy individuals. 18 healthy men performed 12 tasks. Functional performance in each task was assessed based on objective outcome measures and subjectively in terms of perceived task difficulty, local and general discomfort. Wearing the exoskeleton tended to increase objective performance in static forward bending, but decreased performance in tasks, such as walking, carrying and ladder climbing. A significant decrease was found in perceived task difficulty and local discomfort in the back in static forward bending, but a significant increase of perceived difficulty in several other tasks, like walking, squatting and wide standing. Especially tasks that involved hip flexion were perceived more difficult with the exoskeleton. Design improvements should include provisions to allow full range of motion of hips and trunk to increase versatility and user acceptance.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assistive device; Low back pain; User acceptance

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29885731     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  14 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation and Test Methods of Industrial Exoskeletons In Vitro, In Vivo, and In Silico: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Liying Zheng; Brian Lowe; Ashley L Hawke; John Z Wu
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2021

2.  A Pilot Study of Varying Thoracic and Abdominal Compression in a Reconfigurable Trunk Exoskeleton During Different Activities.

Authors:  Maja Gorsic; Yubi Regmi; Alwyn P Johnson; Boyi Dai; Domen Novak
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Risk Factors Associated with the Prevalence of Upper and Lower Back Pain in Male Underground Coal Miners in Punjab, Pakistan.

Authors:  Madiha Ijaz; Muhammad Akram; Sajid Rashid Ahmad; Kamran Mirza; Falaq Ali Nadeem; Steven M Thygerson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Comparison of Subjective Responses of Low Back Pain Patients and Asymptomatic Controls to Use of Spinal Exoskeleton during Simple Load Lifting Tasks: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Žiga Kozinc; Jan Babič; Nejc Šarabon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Variational Principle of Least Psychomotor Action: Modelling Effects on Action from Disturbances in Psychomotor Work Involving Human, Cyborg, and Robot Workers.

Authors:  Stephen Fox; Adrian Kotelba
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 2.524

6.  Passive Back Support Exoskeleton Improves Range of Motion Using Flexible Beams.

Authors:  Matthias B Näf; Axel S Koopman; Saskia Baltrusch; Carlos Rodriguez-Guerrero; Bram Vanderborght; Dirk Lefeber
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2018-06-21

Review 7.  Towards a Functional Performance Validation Standard for Industrial Low-Back Exoskeletons: State of the Art Review.

Authors:  Mattia Pesenti; Alberto Antonietti; Marta Gandolla; Alessandra Pedrocchi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Characterizing the comfort limits of forces applied to the shoulders, thigh and shank to inform exosuit design.

Authors:  Matthew B Yandell; David M Ziemnicki; Kirsty A McDonald; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Gaussian Mixture Models for Control of Quasi-Passive Spinal Exoskeletons.

Authors:  Marko Jamšek; Tadej Petrič; Jan Babič
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Low-profile elastic exosuit reduces back muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Erik P Lamers; Juliana C Soltys; Keaton L Scherpereel; Aaron J Yang; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.