Christopher T Sica1, Sebastian Rupprecht2, Ryan J Hou1, Matthew T Lanagan2, Navid P Gandji1, Michael T Lanagan3,4, Qing X Yang1,2,4. 1. Department of Radiology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania. 2. HyQ Research Solutions, LLC, State College, Pennsylvania. 3. Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics, University Park, Pennsylvania. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To present a 3T brain imaging study using a conformal prototype helmet constructed with an ultra-high dielectric constant (uHDC; εr ~ 1000) materials that can be inserted into standard receive head-coils. METHODS: A helmet conformal to a standard human head constructed with uHDC materials was characterized through electromagnetic simulations and experimental work. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), transmit efficiency, and power deposition with the uHDC helmet inserted within a 20-channel head coil were measured in vivo and compared with a 64-channel head coil and the 20-channel coil without the helmet. Seven healthy volunteers were analyzed. RESULTS: Simulation and in vivo experimental results showed that transmit efficiency was improved by nearly 3 times within localized regions for a quadrature excitation, with a measured global increase of 58.21 ± 6.54% over 7 volunteers. The use of a parallel transmit spokes pulse compensated for severe degradation of B 1 + homogeneity, at the expense of higher global and local specific absorption rate levels. A SNR histogram analysis with statistical testing demonstrated that the uHDC helmet enhanced a 20-channel head coil to the level of the 64-channel head coil, with the improvements mainly within the cortical brain regions. CONCLUSION: A prototype uHDC helmet enhanced the SNR of a standard head coil to the level of a high density 64-channel coil, although transmit homogeneity was compromised. Further improvements in SNR may be achievable with optimization of this technology, and could be a low-cost approach for future radiofrequency engineering work in the brain at 3T.
PURPOSE: To present a 3T brain imaging study using a conformal prototype helmet constructed with an ultra-high dielectric constant (uHDC; εr ~ 1000) materials that can be inserted into standard receive head-coils. METHODS: A helmet conformal to a standard human head constructed with uHDC materials was characterized through electromagnetic simulations and experimental work. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), transmit efficiency, and power deposition with the uHDC helmet inserted within a 20-channel head coil were measured in vivo and compared with a 64-channel head coil and the 20-channel coil without the helmet. Seven healthy volunteers were analyzed. RESULTS: Simulation and in vivo experimental results showed that transmit efficiency was improved by nearly 3 times within localized regions for a quadrature excitation, with a measured global increase of 58.21 ± 6.54% over 7 volunteers. The use of a parallel transmit spokes pulse compensated for severe degradation of B 1 + homogeneity, at the expense of higher global and local specific absorption rate levels. A SNR histogram analysis with statistical testing demonstrated that the uHDC helmet enhanced a 20-channel head coil to the level of the 64-channel head coil, with the improvements mainly within the cortical brain regions. CONCLUSION: A prototype uHDC helmet enhanced the SNR of a standard head coil to the level of a high density 64-channel coil, although transmit homogeneity was compromised. Further improvements in SNR may be achievable with optimization of this technology, and could be a low-cost approach for future radiofrequency engineering work in the brain at 3T.
Authors: J T Vaughan; M Garwood; C M Collins; W Liu; L DelaBarre; G Adriany; P Andersen; H Merkle; R Goebel; M B Smith; K Ugurbil Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Felix A Breuer; Stephan A R Kannengiesser; Martin Blaimer; Nicole Seiberlich; Peter M Jakob; Mark A Griswold Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Nikos Priovoulos; Heidi I L Jacobs; Dimo Ivanov; Kâmil Uludağ; Frans R J Verhey; Benedikt A Poser Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-07-22 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Marc D Lindley; Daniel Kim; Glen Morrell; Marta E Heilbrun; Pippa Storey; Christopher J Hanrahan; Vivian S Lee Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Andreas Christ; Wolfgang Kainz; Eckhart G Hahn; Katharina Honegger; Marcel Zefferer; Esra Neufeld; Wolfgang Rascher; Rolf Janka; Werner Bautz; Ji Chen; Berthold Kiefer; Peter Schmitt; Hans-Peter Hollenbach; Jianxiang Shen; Michael Oberle; Dominik Szczerba; Anthony Kam; Joshua W Guag; Niels Kuster Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Paul S Jacobs; Blake Benyard; Abigail Cember; Ravi Prakash Reddy Nanga; Quy Cao; M Dylan Tisdall; Neil Wilson; Sandhitsu Das; Kathryn A Davis; John Detre; David Roalf; Ravinder Reddy Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2022-08-15 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Navid P Gandji; Christopher T Sica; Michael T Lanagan; Myung-Kyun Woo; Lance DelaBarre; Jerahmie Radder; Bei Zhang; Riccardo Lattanzi; Gregor Adriany; Kamil Ugurbil; Qing X Yang Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-07-17 Impact factor: 3.737