Richard C Wasserman1, Susan E Varni2, Matthew C Hollander2, Valerie S Harder2. 1. The Robert Larner, MD College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont Richard.Wasserman@med.uvm.edu. 2. The Robert Larner, MD College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Evidence that fewer children are being seen at family physician (FP) practices has not been confirmed using population-level data. This study examines the proportion of children seen at FP and pediatrician practices over time and the influence of patient demographics and rurality on this trend. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective longitudinal analysis of Vermont all-payer claims (2009-2016) for children aged 0 to 21 years. The sample included 184,794 children with 2 or more claims over 8 years. Generalized estimating equations modeled the outcome of child attribution to a FP practice annually, with covariates for calendar year, child age, sex, insurance, and child Rural Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) category. RESULTS: Over time, controlling for other covariates, children were 5% less likely to be attributed to a FP practice (P <.001). Children had greater odds of attribution to a FP practice as they aged (odds ratio (OR) = 1.11, 95% CI, 1.10-1.11), if they were female (OR = 1.05, 95% CI, 1.03-1.07) or had Medicaid (OR = 1.09, 95% CI, 1.07-1.10). Compared with urban children, those from large rural cities (OR = 1.54, 95% CI, 1.51-1.57), small rural towns (OR = 1.45, 95% CI, 1.42-1.48), or isolated/small rural towns (OR = 1.96, 95% CI, 1.93-2.00) had greater odds of FP attribution. When stratified by RUCA, however, children had 3% lower odds of attending a FP practice in urban areas and 8% lower odds in isolated/small rural towns. CONCLUSIONS: The declining proportion of children attending FP practices, confirmed in this population-based analysis and more pronounced in rural areas, represents a continuing challenge.
PURPOSE: Evidence that fewer children are being seen at family physician (FP) practices has not been confirmed using population-level data. This study examines the proportion of children seen at FP and pediatrician practices over time and the influence of patient demographics and rurality on this trend. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective longitudinal analysis of Vermont all-payer claims (2009-2016) for children aged 0 to 21 years. The sample included 184,794 children with 2 or more claims over 8 years. Generalized estimating equations modeled the outcome of child attribution to a FP practice annually, with covariates for calendar year, child age, sex, insurance, and child Rural Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) category. RESULTS: Over time, controlling for other covariates, children were 5% less likely to be attributed to a FP practice (P <.001). Children had greater odds of attribution to a FP practice as they aged (odds ratio (OR) = 1.11, 95% CI, 1.10-1.11), if they were female (OR = 1.05, 95% CI, 1.03-1.07) or had Medicaid (OR = 1.09, 95% CI, 1.07-1.10). Compared with urban children, those from large rural cities (OR = 1.54, 95% CI, 1.51-1.57), small rural towns (OR = 1.45, 95% CI, 1.42-1.48), or isolated/small rural towns (OR = 1.96, 95% CI, 1.93-2.00) had greater odds of FP attribution. When stratified by RUCA, however, children had 3% lower odds of attending a FP practice in urban areas and 8% lower odds in isolated/small rural towns. CONCLUSIONS: The declining proportion of children attending FP practices, confirmed in this population-based analysis and more pronounced in rural areas, represents a continuing challenge.
Authors: Andrew W Bazemore; Laura A Makaroff; James C Puffer; Parwen Parhat; Robert L Phillips; Imam M Xierali; Jason Rinaldo Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2012 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Anne-Emmanuelle Ambresin; Kristina Bennett; George C Patton; Lena A Sanci; Susan M Sawyer Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Anna L Christensen; Joseph S Zickafoose; Brenda Natzke; Stacey McMorrow; Henry T Ireys Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2015 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Stephen M Petterson; Winston R Liaw; Robert L Phillips; David L Rabin; David S Meyers; Andrew W Bazemore Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2012 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Laura A Makaroff; Imam M Xierali; Stephen M Petterson; Scott A Shipman; James C Puffer; Andrew W Bazemore Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2014 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Alyna T Chien; JoAnna Leyenaar; Marisa Tomaino; Steven Woloshin; Lindsey Leininger; Erin R Barnett; Jennifer L McLaren; Ellen Meara Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2022 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Elizabeth R Wolf; Alicia Richards; Martin Lavallee; Roy T Sabo; Alan R Schroeder; Matthew Schefft; Alex H Krist Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2021-09-23 Impact factor: 9.703