PURPOSE: To review the literature on young people's perspectives on health care with a view to defining domains and indicators of youth-friendly care. METHODS: Three bibliographic databases were searched to identify studies that purportedly measured young people's perspectives on health care. Each study was assessed to identify the constructs, domains, and indicators of adolescent-friendly health care. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were identified: 15 used quantitative methods, six used qualitative methods and one used mixed methodology. Eight domains stood out as central to young people's positive experience of care. These were: accessibility of health care; staff attitude; communication; medical competency; guideline-driven care; age appropriate environments; youth involvement in health care; and health outcomes. Staff attitudes, which included notions of respect and friendliness, appeared universally applicable, whereas other domains, such as an appropriate environment including cleanliness, were more specific to particular contexts. CONCLUSION: These eight domains provide a practical framework for assessing how well services are engaging young people. Measures of youth-friendly health care should address universally applicable indicators of youth-friendly care and may benefit from additional questions that are specific to the local health setting.
PURPOSE: To review the literature on young people's perspectives on health care with a view to defining domains and indicators of youth-friendly care. METHODS: Three bibliographic databases were searched to identify studies that purportedly measured young people's perspectives on health care. Each study was assessed to identify the constructs, domains, and indicators of adolescent-friendly health care. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were identified: 15 used quantitative methods, six used qualitative methods and one used mixed methodology. Eight domains stood out as central to young people's positive experience of care. These were: accessibility of health care; staff attitude; communication; medical competency; guideline-driven care; age appropriate environments; youth involvement in health care; and health outcomes. Staff attitudes, which included notions of respect and friendliness, appeared universally applicable, whereas other domains, such as an appropriate environment including cleanliness, were more specific to particular contexts. CONCLUSION: These eight domains provide a practical framework for assessing how well services are engaging young people. Measures of youth-friendly health care should address universally applicable indicators of youth-friendly care and may benefit from additional questions that are specific to the local health setting.
Authors: Carly E Guss; G Alice Woolverton; Joshua Borus; S Bryn Austin; Sari L Reisner; Sabra L Katz-Wise Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2019-06-18 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Susan M Sawyer; Robyn McNeil; Maria McCarthy; Lisa Orme; Kate Thompson; Sarah Drew; David Dunt Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Diego Garcia-Huidobro; Nathan Shippee; Julia Joseph-DiCaprio; Jennifer M O'Brien; Maria Veronica Svetaz Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Lana Lee; Baligh R Yehia; Aditya H Gaur; Richard Rutstein; Kelly Gebo; Jeanne C Keruly; Richard D Moore; Ank E Nijhawan; Allison L Agwu Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2016-03-16 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Eddy Eustache; Margaret E Gerbasi; Jennifer Severe; J Reginald Fils-Aimé; Mary C Smith Fawzi; Giuseppe J Raviola; Sarah Darghouth; Kate Boyd; Tatiana Thérosmé; Rupinder Legha; Ermaze L Pierre; Emmeline Affricot; Yoldie Alcindor; David J Grelotti; Anne E Becker Journal: Int J Soc Psychiatry Date: 2017-04-03
Authors: Eddy Eustache; Margaret E Gerbasi; Mary C Smith Fawzi; J Reginald Fils-Aimé; Jennifer Severe; Giuseppe J Raviola; Rupinder Legha; Sarah Darghouth; David J Grelotti; Tatiana Thérosmé; Ermaze L Pierre; Emmeline Affricot; Yoldie Alcindor; Anne E Becker Journal: Int J Soc Psychiatry Date: 2017-04-03