| Literature DB >> 31496911 |
Gian Franco Veraldi1, Luca Mezzetto1, Lorenzo Scorsone1, Marco Macrì1, Fabio Simoncini1, Giuseppe Lippi2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The identification of patients at higher risk of developing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)-related complications is pivotal for achieving better clinical outcomes. We carried out a single-center, observational, retrospective study to explore whether in-hospital changes of red blood cell distribution width (RDW) may help predicting early development of PTA-related complications.Entities:
Keywords: complications; percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; peripheral artery occlusive disease; red blood cell distribution width; restenosis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31496911 PMCID: PMC6708289 DOI: 10.2478/jomb-2018-0047
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Biochem ISSN: 1452-8266 Impact factor: 3.402
Figure 1Diagnostic performance (Receiver Operating Characteristics curve) of delta red blood cell distribution width (RDW) for predicting 1-month complications after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA).
Comparison of demographic and laboratory data between percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) cases and controls. Results are shown and median and interquartile range or proportion.
| Parameter | Controls | PTA patients | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| n | 352 | 224 | – |
| Age (years) | 73 (12) | 74 (12) | 0.107 |
| Sex (F/M) | 115/237 | 72/152 | 0.484 |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 135 (62) | 131 (28) | <0.001 |
| MCV (fL) | 89 (10) | 93 (7) | <0.001 |
| RDW (%) | 13.7 (2.1) | 14.3 (2.2) | <0.001 |
MCV, mean corpuscular volume; PTA, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; RDW, red blood cell distribution width
Comparison of demographic and laboratory data percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) patients with or without complications 1 at 1 month after hospital discharge. Results are shown as median and interquartile range or proportions.
| Parameter | No complications | P admission vs discharge | Complications | P admission vs discharge | P complications vs no complications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | 213 | – | 11 | – | – |
| Age (years) | 74 (13) | – | 72 (15) | - | 0.135 |
| Sex (F/M) | 66/147 | – | 5/6 | – | 0.051 |
| Discharge therapy (APT/OAC) | 173/40 | 8/3 | 0.486 | ||
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | |||||
| - Admission value | 130 (27) | 0.365 | 137 (54) | 0.041 | 0.283 |
| - Discharge value | 125 (29) | 121 (46) | 0.334 | ||
| MCV (fL) | |||||
| – Admission value | 93 (7) | 0.487 | 95 (9) | 0.074 | 0.427 |
| – Discharge value | 92 (9) | 91 (10) | 0.358 | ||
| RDW (%) | |||||
| – Admission value | 14.3 (2.2) | 0.267 | 13.2 (1.4) | 0.013 | 0.149 |
| – Discharge value | 14.3 (2.0) | 14.1 (1.7) | 0.333 | ||
| – Delta RDW | 1.00 (0.06) | – | 1.03 (0.04) | – | 0.041 |
| – Delta RDW =1 (n) | 97/213 | – | 8/11 | – | 0.039 |
APT, antiplatelet therapy; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; OAC, oral anticoagulants, PTA, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; RDW, red blood cell distribution width