Literature DB >> 22192663

Classification and clinical impact of restenosis after femoropopliteal stenting.

Atsushi Tosaka1, Yoshimitsu Soga, Osamu Iida, Takayuki Ishihara, Keisuke Hirano, Kenji Suzuki, Hiroyoshi Yokoi, Shinsuke Nanto, Masakiyo Nobuyoshi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after femoropopliteal (FP) stenting and the frequency of refractory ISR.
BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis after FP stenting is an unsolved problem. The incidence and predictors of refractory restenosis remain unclear.
METHODS: This study was a multicenter, retrospective observational study. From September 2000 to December 2009, 133 restenotic lesions after FP artery stenting were classified by angiographic pattern: class I included focal lesions (≤50 mm in length), class II included diffuse lesions (>50 mm in length), and class III included totally occluded ISR. All patients were treated by balloon angioplasty for at least 60 s. Recurrent ISR or occlusion was defined as ISR or occlusion after target lesion revascularization. Restenosis was defined as >2.4 of the peak systolic velocity ratio by duplex scan or >50% stenosis by angiography.
RESULTS: Sixty-four percent of patients were male, 67% had diabetes mellitus, and 24% underwent hemodialysis. Class I pattern was found in 29% of the limbs, class II in 38%, and class III in 33%. Mean follow-up period was 24 ± 17 months. All-cause death occurred in 14 patients; bypass surgery was performed in 11 limbs, and major amputation was performed in 1 limb during the follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the rate of recurrent ISR at 2 years was 84.8% in class III patients compared with 49.9% in class I patients (p < 0.0001) and 53.3% in class II patients (p = 0.0003), and the rate of recurrent occlusion at 2 years was 64.6% in class III patients compared with 15.9% in class I patients (p < 0.0001) and 18.9% in class II patients (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Restenotic patterns after FP stenting are important predictors of recurrent ISR and occlusion.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22192663     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  41 in total

1.  Intravascular ultrasound guided directional atherectomy versus directional atherectomy guided by angiography for the treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Prakash Krishnan; Arthur Tarricone; Purushothaman K-Raman; Farhan Majeed; Vishal Kapur; Karthik Gujja; Jose Wiley; Miguel Vasquez; Rheoneil A Lascano; Katherine G Quiles; Tashanne Distin; Ran Fontenelle; Farah Atallah-Lajam; Annapoorna Kini; Samin Sharma
Journal:  Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2018-01

Review 2.  Drug-coated balloons for coronary and peripheral interventional procedures.

Authors:  Jochen Wöhrle
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Treatment of Superficial Femoral Artery Restenosis.

Authors:  Andrew J Miller; Edwin A Takahashi; William S Harmsen; Kristin C Mara; Sanjay Misra
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Outcomes of Zilver PTX stent implantation for the treatment of complex femoropopliteal artery disease.

Authors:  Masahiko Fujihara; Makoto Utsunomiya; Akihiro Higashimori; Yoshiaki Yokoi; Masato Nakamura
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 5.  Successful Peripheral Vascular Intervention in Patients with High-risk Comorbidities or Lesion Characteristics.

Authors:  E Hope Weissler; J Antonio Gutierrez; Manesh R Patel; Rajesh V Swaminathan
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Mid-term outcomes following endovascular re-intervention for iliac artery in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Usman Javed; Christopher R Balwanz; Ehrin J Armstrong; Khung-Keong Yeo; Gagan D Singh; Satinder Singh; David Anderson; Gregory G Westin; William C Pevec; John R Laird
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease.

Authors:  Saurabh Mehrotra; Ganesh Paramasivam; Sundeep Mishra
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Angiographic characteristics of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis: association with long-term outcomes after endovascular intervention.

Authors:  Ehrin J Armstrong; Satinder Singh; Gagan D Singh; Khung-Keong Yeo; Shaan Ludder; Gregory Westin; David Anderson; David L Dawson; William C Pevec; John R Laird
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Lesion Revascularisation Subsequent to Femoropopliteal Spot Stenting Using the Multi-LOC Stent Delivery System.

Authors:  Martin Sigl; Klaus Amendt; Matthias Waliszewski; Nils Rathmann
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  Passive biaxial mechanical properties and in vivo axial pre-stretch of the diseased human femoropopliteal and tibial arteries.

Authors:  Alexey V Kamenskiy; Iraklis I Pipinos; Yuris A Dzenis; Carol S Lomneth; Syed A Jaffar Kazmi; Nicholas Y Phillips; Jason N MacTaggart
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 8.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.