Literature DB >> 31494432

Dynamics of auditory spatial attention gradients.

Edward J Golob1, Jeffrey R Mock2.   

Abstract

Auditory spatial attention faces the conflicting demands of focusing on the current task while also rapidly shifting location to unexpected stimuli. We examined the interplay of sustained focus and intermittent shifts in an auditory spatial attention task. Most trials required a choice response from a standard location in virtual space (L-R: -90°, 0°, +90°), but occasionally the location shifted between 45°-180°. Reaction time curves for angular shifts had a quadratic shape, with slowing for small shifts but faster reaction times for larger shifts. The reaction time curves were maintained at faster stimulus rates and usually scaled to fit the range of stimulus locations. However, focus on the right had an attenuated curve, and did not scale to the range of locations. The findings suggest two mechanisms: a top-down bias centered on standard locations that decreases with distance, and a bottom-up bias that under these conditions increases with distance from the standard location.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amplitude modulation; Attention orienting; Sound localization

Year:  2019        PMID: 31494432      PMCID: PMC6861696          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  55 in total

1.  Auditory distraction by duration and location deviants: a behavioral and event-related potential study.

Authors:  Urte Roeber; Andreas Widmann; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-07

2.  Neural activity before and after conscious perception in dichotic listening.

Authors:  Kate A Yurgil; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 3.  Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  The attentional field has a Mexican hat distribution.

Authors:  Notger G Müller; Maas Mollenhauer; Alexander Rösler; Andreas Kleinschmidt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  A place theory of sound localization.

Authors:  L A JEFFRESS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1948-02

Review 6.  Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful.

Authors:  Joel S Warm; Raja Parasuraman; Gerald Matthews
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.888

7.  Shifting and focusing auditory spatial attention.

Authors:  T A Mondor; R J Zatorre
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Perceptual-motor expectancies interact with covert visual orienting under conditions of endogenous but not exogenous control.

Authors:  R M Klein
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1994-06

9.  Sensory cortical interactions in aging, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  E J Golob; G G Miranda; J K Johnson; A Starr
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 10.  Attentional enhancement of spatial resolution: linking behavioural and neurophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 34.870

View more
  1 in total

1.  Auditory spatial attention gradients and cognitive control as a function of vigilance.

Authors:  Edward J Golob; Jeremy T Nelson; Jaelle Scheuerman; Kristen B Venable; Jeffrey R Mock
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 4.348

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.