Literature DB >> 31489485

Single-level cervical arthroplasty with ProDisc-C artificial disc: 10-year follow-up results in one centre.

Yanbin Zhao1, Feifei Zhou1, Yu Sun2, Shengfa Pan1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical arthroplasty using the ProDisc-C prosthesis.
METHODS: Clinical and radiographic evaluations, including dynamic flexion-extension lateral images, were performed at baseline and at 10-year follow-up.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients who had single-level ProDisc-C arthroplasty were followed up for a mean period of 123 months. The range of motion at the operated level was 8.9° ± 3.9° at baseline and 6.6° ± 3.5° at final follow-up. Twenty of 27 levels (74%) developed heterotopic ossification. According to McAfee's classification, one level was classified as grade I, four levels were classified as grade II, 12 levels were classified as grade III and three levels were classified as grade IV. Three patients developed recurrent cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy due to adjacent segment disease and received the reoperations. The reoperations included two cases of cervical arthroplasty at adjacent segments and one case of cervical laminoplasty.
CONCLUSIONS: ProDisc-C arthroplasty had acceptable clinical and radiographic results at 10-year follow-up. Heterotopic ossification was common after ProDisc-C arthroplasty, which decreased the range of motion. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjacent segment disease; Cervical disc arthroplasty; Heterotopic ossification

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31489485     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-019-06110-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  9 in total

1.  Assessment of adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty: a prospective 2-year study.

Authors:  James T Robertson; Stephen M Papadopoulos; Vincent C Traynelis
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2005-12

2.  Location change of center of rotation after single-level cervical total disc replacement with ProDisc-C.

Authors:  Jigang Lou; Huibo Li; Xin Rong; Wenjie Wu; Hao Liu
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.511

3.  The predisposing factors for the heterotopic ossification after cervical artificial disc replacement.

Authors:  Seong Yi; Dong Ah Shin; Keung Nyun Kim; Gwihyun Choi; Hyun Chul Shin; Keun Su Kim; Do Heum Yoon
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  A RCT comparing 7-year clinical outcomes of one level symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD) following ProDisc-C total disc arthroplasty (TDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

Authors:  Thomas P Loumeau; Bruce V Darden; Thomas J Kesman; Susan M Odum; Bryce A Van Doren; Eric B Laxer; Daniel B Murrey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  High prevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical disc arthroplasty: outcome and intraoperative findings following explantation of 22 cervical disc prostheses.

Authors:  Christopher Brenke; Johann Scharf; Kirsten Schmieder; Martin Barth
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-06-01

6.  Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.

Authors:  Daniel Murrey; Michael Janssen; Rick Delamarter; Jeffrey Goldstein; Jack Zigler; Bobby Tay; Bruce Darden
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Clinical and radiological outcome at 10 years of follow-up after total cervical disc replacement.

Authors:  Christoph Mehren; Franziska Heider; Christoph J Siepe; Bernhard Zillner; Ralph Kothe; Andreas Korge; H Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  ProDisc-C Total Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Single-Level Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease: Seven-Year Follow-up of the Prospective Randomized U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study.

Authors:  Michael E Janssen; Jack E Zigler; Jeffrey M Spivak; Rick B Delamarter; Bruce V Darden; Branko Kopjar
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Heterotopic Ossification after Cervical Arthroplasty with ProDisc-C: Time Course Radiographic Follow-up over 3 years.

Authors:  Yong-Hwan Cho; Keun-Su Kim; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2013-03-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.