| Literature DB >> 31489099 |
Rim Batti1, Amina Mokrani1, Haifa Rachdi1, Henda Raies1, Omar Touhami2, Mouna Ayadi1, Khadija Meddeb1, Feryel Letaief1, Yosra Yahiaoui1, Nesrine Chraiet1, Amel Mezlini1.
Abstract
Gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) develops from abnormal cellular proliferation of trophoblasts following fertilization. It includes benign trophoblastic disease (hydatidiform moles (HM)) and the malignant trophoblastic diseases or gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). The frequency of the GTD in Tunisia is one per 918 deliveries. The aim of this study is to analyze the clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes of GTD at Salah Azaiez Institute (ISA). Medical records of women diagnosed with GTD at ISA from January 1st, 1981 to December 31st, 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. FIGO score was determined retrospectively for patients treated before 2002. One hundred and nine patients with GTN were included. Patients presented with metastases at 43% of cases. The most common metastatic sites were lung (30%) and vagina (13%). Fifty six (56 (51%) patients had low-risk and 21 (19%) cases had high-risk, the FIGO score was not assessed in 32 cases. After a median follow-up of 46 months, 21 patients were lost to follow-up, 12 patients died, 19 progressed and 8 relapsed. At 10 years, the OS rate was 85% and the PFS rate 79%. OS was significantly influenced by the presence of metastases at presentation (M0 100 % vs. Metastatic 62 %; p < 0.0001), FIGO stage (I-II 100% VS 61% and 65% for stage III and IV; p < 0.001), FIGO score (low-risk 99 % vs. high-risk 78 %; p < 0.001). GTN is a significant source of maternal morbidity with increased risk of mortality from complications if not detected early and treated promptly.Entities:
Keywords: Gestational trophoblastic disease; choriocarcinoma; outcomes; prognosis
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31489099 PMCID: PMC6711693 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2019.33.121.13897
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
Initial presenting features and reproductive history
| N | |
|---|---|
| Median | 22 |
| Min | 15 |
| Max | 32 |
| Mean | 13 |
| Min | 10 |
| Max | 17 |
| Prior Hydatidiform mole | 11 |
| Prior spontaneous miscarriage | 50 |
| Voluntary interruption of pregnancy | 7 |
| 0 | 4 |
| 1 | 6 |
| 2 | 9 |
| ≥3 | 60 |
| Median | 4 |
| 0 | 15 |
| 1 | 12 |
| 2 | 9 |
| ≥3 | 51 |
| Median | 3 |
| 0 | 11 |
| 1 | 12 |
| 2 | 11 |
| ≥3 | 45 |
| Estrogen/progestin | 14 |
| intrauterine device | 5 |
| No contraception | 9 |
| Unkown | 81 |
| Abnormal vagina bleeding | 68 |
| Abdominal pain | 6 |
| Metastases | 8 |
| During the monitoring after molar pregnancy | 10 |
Summary of chemotherapeutic protocols. Legend: CRI: complete response to initial chemotherapy
| Disease category/ CT | Number of patient | CRIN |
|---|---|---|
| Single agent Methotrexate | 24 | 17 |
| Single agent Actinomycin | 6 | 4 |
| MTX-vincristine | 6 | 6 |
| Actinomycin-etoposide | 16 | 8 |
| Cisplatin-adriamycin-etoposide | 1 | 1 |
| Cisplatin-actino-etoposide | 1 | 1 |
| Unkown | 2 | |
| Cisplatin-actinomycin-etoposide | 8 | 6 |
| Cisplatin-adriamycin-etoposide | 3 | 2 |
| Cisplatin adriamycin | 1 | unkown |
| Etoposide-actinomycin | 2 | 0 |
| Cisplatin actinomycin | 1 | 0 |
| BEP | 1 | 1 |
| EMACO | 1 | |
| Actionomycin | 2 | 0 |
| Methotrexate | 1 | 0 |
| Unkown | 1 | |
| Single agent CT | 8 | |
| Actinomycin-etoposide | 5 | |
| Methotrexate-oncovin | 8 | |
| Actinomycin-vinblastin | 2 | |
| Methtrexate-vinblastine | 1 | |
| EP/EMA | 1 | |
| BEP | 1 | |
| Cisplatin-actino-etoposide | 1 | |
| Cisplatin-actinomycin-bleo-velbe-Endoxan | 1 | |
| Unkown | 4 |
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression free survival
Figure 3Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival by distant metastasis
Figure 4Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival by FIGO stage
Figure 5Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival by FIGO prognostic score