Literature DB >> 21263100

Phase III trial of weekly methotrexate or pulsed dactinomycin for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a gynecologic oncology group study.

Raymond J Osborne1, Virginia Filiaci, Julian C Schink, Robert S Mannel, Angeles Alvarez Secord, Joseph L Kelley, Diane Provencher, David Scott Miller, Allan L Covens, Janice M Lage.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is no consensus on the best regimen for the primary treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two commonly used single-drug regimens were compared with respect to the proportion of patients meeting the criteria for a complete response (CR) in a randomized phase III trial conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Eligibility was purposefully broad to maximize the generalizability of the results and included patients with a WHO risk score of 0 to 6 and patients with metastatic disease (limited to lung lesions < 2 cm, adnexa, or vagina) or choriocarcinoma.
RESULTS: Two hundred forty women were enrolled, and 216 were deemed eligible. Biweekly intravenous dactinomycin 1.25 mg/m² was statistically superior to weekly intramuscular (IM) methotrexate 30 mg/m² (CR: 70% v 53%; P = .01). Similarly, in patients with low-risk GTN as defined before the 2002 WHO risk score revisions (risk score of 0 to 4 and excluding choriocarcinoma), response was 58% and 73% in the methotrexate and dactinomycin arms, respectively (P = .03). Both regimens were less effective if the WHO risk score was 5 or 6 or if the diagnosis was choriocarcinoma (CR: 9% and 42%, respectively). There were two potential recurrences; one at 4 months (dactinomycin) and one at 22 months (methotrexate). Not all patients completed follow-up. Both regimens were well tolerated.
CONCLUSION: The biweekly dactinomycin regimen has a higher CR rate than the weekly IM methotrexate regimen in low-risk GTN, a generally curable disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21263100      PMCID: PMC3068058          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.4386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  20 in total

1.  Better treatments that cost more: the dilemma.

Authors:  L Elit; A Gafni; M N Levine
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  Negotiating a staging and risk factor scoring system for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. A progress report.

Authors:  Ernest I Kohorn
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 0.142

3.  Low-risk persistent gestational trophoblastic disease: outcome after initial treatment with low-dose methotrexate and folinic acid from 1992 to 2000.

Authors:  I A McNeish; S Strickland; L Holden; G J S Rustin; M Foskett; M J Seckl; E S Newlands
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Actinomycin D as the primary agent for gestational trophoblastic disease.

Authors:  R Osathanondh; D P Goldstein; G B Pastorfide
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Is lack of response to single-agent chemotherapy in gestational trophoblastic disease associated with dose scheduling or chemotherapy resistance?

Authors:  Ernest I Kohorn
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Methotrexate infusion in low-risk gestational trophoblastic disease.

Authors:  L C Wong; H Y Ngan; D K Cheng; T Y Ng
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Single-dose actinomycin D in the treatment of postmolar trophoblastic disease.

Authors:  J B Schlaerth; C P Morrow; R H Nalick; O Gaddis
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Treatment of nonmetastatic gestational trophoblastic disease: results of methotrexate alone versus methotrexate--folinic acid.

Authors:  E B Smith; J C Weed; L Tyrey; C B Hammond
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-09-01       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 9.  Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia and evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Ernest I Kohorn
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 0.142

10.  Pulse actinomycin D scheduling in nonmetastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: cost-effective chemotherapy.

Authors:  L B Twiggs
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  28 in total

1.  Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: treatment outcomes from a single institutional experience.

Authors:  H Al-Husaini; H Soudy; A Darwish; M Ahmed; A Eltigani; W Edesa; T Elhassan; A Omar; W Elghamry; H Al-Hashem; S Al-Hayli; I Madkhali; S Ahmad; I A Al-Badawi
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  The roles of surgery and EMA/CO chemotherapy regimen in primary refractory and non-refractory gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

Authors:  Adnan Aydiner; Serkan Keskin; Sinan Berkman; Ergin Bengisu; Huseyin Ridvan Ilhan; Faruk Tas; Erkan Topuz
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Actinomycin D: a new opening for an old drug.

Authors:  Gaetano Finocchiaro
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Cost-effectiveness of second curettage for treatment of low-risk non-metastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

Authors:  Samantha Batman; Ashley Skeith; Allison Allen; Elizabeth Munro; Aaron Caughey; Amanda Bruegl
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Are different methotrexate regimens as first line therapy for low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia more cost effective than the dactinomycin regimen used in GOG 0174?

Authors:  Caela R Miller; Nicole P Chappell; Caitlin Sledge; Charles A Leath; Neil T Phippen; Laura J Havrilesky; Jason C Barnett
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Actinomycin D Specifically Reduces Expanded CUG Repeat RNA in Myotonic Dystrophy Models.

Authors:  Ruth B Siboni; Masayuki Nakamori; Stacey D Wagner; Adam J Struck; Leslie A Coonrod; Shanee A Harriott; Daniel M Cass; Matthew K Tanner; J Andrew Berglund
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 7.  Clinical trials in gynecologic oncology: Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Christina M Annunziata; Elise C Kohn
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 8.  Targeting tumour-supportive cellular machineries in anticancer drug development.

Authors:  Matthias Dobbelstein; Ute Moll
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 84.694

9.  Second Curettage for Low-Risk Nonmetastatic Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia.

Authors:  Raymond J Osborne; Virginia L Filiaci; Julian C Schink; Robert S Mannel; Kian Behbakht; James S Hoffman; Nick M Spirtos; John K Chan; John A Tidy; David S Miller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 10.  Chemotherapy for resistant or recurrent gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

Authors:  Mo'iad Alazzam; John Tidy; Raymond Osborne; Robert Coleman; Barry W Hancock; Theresa A Lawrie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.