Literature DB >> 23233709

EMA/CO for high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: good outcomes with induction low-dose etoposide-cisplatin and genetic analysis.

Constantine Alifrangis1, Roshan Agarwal, Delia Short, Rosemary A Fisher, Neil J Sebire, Richard Harvey, Philip M Savage, Michael J Seckl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with high-risk (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics score ≥ 7) gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) frequently receive etoposide, methotrexate, and dactinomycin alternating weekly with cyclophosphamide and vincristine (EMA/CO). Between 1979 and 1995, overall survival (OS) with this regimen at our institute was 85.4% with a significant proportion of early deaths (< 4 weeks). Here, we determine whether survival rates have improved in a more recent patient cohort (1995 to 2010). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients receiving EMA/CO were identified using the Charing Cross GTN database. Genetic analysis identified nongestational trophoblastic tumors (nGTTs). The use of induction low-dose etoposide 100 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) (EP; days 1 and 2 every 7 days) since 1995 to reduce early deaths before commencing EMA/CO was noted.
RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-eight patients received EMA/CO between 1995 and 2010. Six patients had nGTTs, 140 had high-risk disease, and 250 had relapsed/resistant low-risk GTN. OS was 94.3% in high-risk patients (90.4% including nGTTs) and 99.6% in the low-risk group, with a median follow-up time of 4.2 years. All patients with nGTT and seven patients with high-risk GTNs died as a result of drug-resistant disease. EP induction chemotherapy was given to 23.1% of high-risk patients (33 of 140 patients) with a large disease burden, and the early death rate was only 0.7% (n = 1; 95% CI, 0.1% to 3.7%) compared with 7.2% (n = 11 of 151 patients; 95% CI, 4.1% to 12.6%) in the pre-1995 cohort.
CONCLUSION: OS after EMA/CO for high-risk GTN has increased by nearly 9%. This reflects a more accurate estimate of OS by excluding nGTTs (3.9%) in patients with atypical presentations using genetic diagnosis. Low-dose induction EP in selected individuals also allows near complete elimination of early deaths. The latter should be considered routinely in high-risk GTN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23233709     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.1817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  35 in total

Review 1.  Gestational trophoblastic tumours: an update for 2014.

Authors:  Fieke E M Froeling; Michael J Seckl
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Results with Floxuridine, Actinomycin D, Etoposide, and Vincristine in Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasias with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Scores ≥5.

Authors:  Yuan Li; Yujia Kong; Xirun Wan; Fengzhi Feng; Tong Ren; Jun Zhao; Junjun Yang; Yang Xiang
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-09-09

3.  Efficacies of FAEV and EMA/CO regimens as primary treatment for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

Authors:  Mingliang Ji; Shiyang Jiang; Jun Zhao; Xirun Wan; Fengzhi Feng; Tong Ren; Junjun Yang; Yang Xiang
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 9.075

4.  Gestational and Non-gestational Trophoblastic Disease. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k Level, AWMF Registry No. 032/049, December 2015).

Authors:  C Tempfer; L-C Horn; S Ackermann; M W Beckmann; R Dittrich; J Einenkel; A Günthert; H Haase; J Kratzsch; M C Kreissl; S Polterauer; A D Ebert; K T M Schneider; H G Strauss; F Thiel
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.915

5.  Targeting Glioma Stem Cell-Derived Pericytes Disrupts the Blood-Tumor Barrier and Improves Chemotherapeutic Efficacy.

Authors:  Wenchao Zhou; Cong Chen; Yu Shi; Qiulian Wu; Ryan C Gimple; Xiaoguang Fang; Zhi Huang; Kui Zhai; Susan Q Ke; Yi-Fang Ping; Hua Feng; Jeremy N Rich; Jennifer S Yu; Shideng Bao; Xiu-Wu Bian
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 24.633

6.  Can the FIGO 2000 scoring system for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia be simplified? A new retrospective analysis from a nationwide dataset.

Authors:  Y K Eysbouts; P B Ottevanger; L F A G Massuger; J IntHout; D Short; R Harvey; B Kaur; N J Sebire; N Sarwar; F C G J Sweep; M J Seckl
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 7.  A review on management of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

Authors:  Seyedeh Reyhaneh Yousefi Sharami; Elham Saffarieh
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-03-26

8.  Diagnosis and management of gestational trophoblastic disease: 2021 update.

Authors:  Hextan Y S Ngan; Michael J Seckl; Ross S Berkowitz; Yang Xiang; François Golfier; Paradan K Sekharan; John R Lurain; Leon Massuger
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 4.447

9.  Predictors of chemotherapy resistance & relapse in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

Authors:  Seema Singhal; Lalit Kumar; Sunesh Kumar; Sachin Khurana; Neerja Bhatla
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Early prediction of treatment resistance in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia using population kinetic modelling of hCG measurements.

Authors:  B You; R Harvey; E Henin; H Mitchell; F Golfier; P M Savage; M Tod; M Wilbaux; G Freyer; M J Seckl
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.