Literature DB >> 31481467

A comparative analysis of Smad-responsive motifs identifies multiple regulatory inputs for TGF-β transcriptional activation.

Yuka Itoh1, Daizo Koinuma2, Chiho Omata1, Tomohiro Ogami2, Mitsuyoshi Motizuki1, So-Ichi Yaguchi1, Takuma Itoh1,3, Kunio Miyake4, Shuichi Tsutsumi5, Hiroyuki Aburatani5, Masao Saitoh1,6, Kohei Miyazono2, Keiji Miyazawa7.   

Abstract

Smad proteins are transcriptional regulators activated by TGF-β. They are known to bind to two distinct Smad-responsive motifs, namely the Smad-binding element (SBE) (5'-GTCTAGAC-3') and CAGA motifs (5'-AGCCAGACA-3' or 5'-TGTCTGGCT-3'). However, the mechanisms by which these motifs promote Smad activity are not fully elucidated. In this study, we performed DNA CASTing, binding assays, ChIP sequencing, and quantitative RT-PCR to dissect the details of Smad binding and function of the SBE and CAGA motifs. We observed a preference for Smad3 to bind CAGA motifs and Smad4 to bind SBE, and that either one SBE or a triple-CAGA motif forms a cis-acting functional half-unit for Smad-dependent transcription activation; combining two half-units allows efficient activation. Unexpectedly, the extent of Smad binding did not directly correlate with the abilities of Smad-binding sequences to induce gene expression. We found that Smad proteins are more tolerant of single bp mutations in the context of the CAGA motifs, with any mutation in the SBE disrupting function. CAGA and CAGA-like motifs but not SBE are widely distributed among stimulus-dependent Smad2/3-binding sites in normal murine mammary gland epithelial cells, and the number of CAGA and CAGA-like motifs correlates with fold-induction of target gene expression by TGF-β. These data, demonstrating Smad responsiveness can be tuned by both sequence and number of repeats, provide a compelling explanation for why CAGA motifs are predominantly used for Smad-dependent transcription activation in vivo.
© 2019 Itoh et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ChIP-sequencing (ChIP-seq); DNA-binding protein; SMAD transcription factor; signal transduction; transcription factor; transcription regulation; transforming growth factor β (TGF-β)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31481467      PMCID: PMC6802517          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.009877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  41 in total

1.  Smad2 and Smad3 positively and negatively regulate TGF beta-dependent transcription through the forkhead DNA-binding protein FAST2.

Authors:  E Labbé; C Silvestri; P A Hoodless; J L Wrana; L Attisano
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Tumor suppressor Smad4 is a transforming growth factor beta-inducible DNA binding protein.

Authors:  J M Yingling; M B Datto; C Wong; J P Frederick; N T Liberati; X F Wang
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Distinct modes of SMAD2 chromatin binding and remodeling shape the transcriptional response to NODAL/Activin signaling.

Authors:  Davide M Coda; Tessa Gaarenstroom; Philip East; Harshil Patel; Daniel S J Miller; Anna Lobley; Nik Matthews; Aengus Stewart; Caroline S Hill
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Defining the sequence specificity of DNA-binding proteins by selecting binding sites from random-sequence oligonucleotides: analysis of yeast GCN4 protein.

Authors:  A R Oliphant; C J Brandl; K Struhl
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Motif Enrichment Analysis: a unified framework and an evaluation on ChIP data.

Authors:  Robert C McLeay; Timothy L Bailey
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Identification and functional characterization of a Smad binding element (SBE) in the JunB promoter that acts as a transforming growth factor-beta, activin, and bone morphogenetic protein-inducible enhancer.

Authors:  L J Jonk; S Itoh; C H Heldin; P ten Dijke; W Kruijer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-08-14       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  The tumor suppressor Smad4/DPC4 and transcriptional adaptor CBP/p300 are coactivators for smad3 in TGF-beta-induced transcriptional activation.

Authors:  X H Feng; Y Zhang; R Y Wu; R Derynck
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Human Smad3 and Smad4 are sequence-specific transcription activators.

Authors:  L Zawel; J L Dai; P Buckhaults; S Zhou; K W Kinzler; B Vogelstein; S E Kern
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 9.  Combinatorial function of transcription factors and cofactors.

Authors:  Franziska Reiter; Sebastian Wienerroither; Alexander Stark
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 4.665

10.  Structural basis for genome wide recognition of 5-bp GC motifs by SMAD transcription factors.

Authors:  Pau Martin-Malpartida; Marta Batet; Zuzanna Kaczmarska; Regina Freier; Tiago Gomes; Eric Aragón; Yilong Zou; Qiong Wang; Qiaoran Xi; Lidia Ruiz; Angela Vea; José A Márquez; Joan Massagué; Maria J Macias
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  4 in total

1.  TGFβ promotes widespread enhancer chromatin opening and operates on genomic regulatory domains.

Authors:  Jose A Guerrero-Martínez; María Ceballos-Chávez; Florian Koehler; Sandra Peiró; Jose C Reyes
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Tgf-β1 transcriptionally promotes 90K expression: possible implications for cancer progression.

Authors:  Antonino Grassadonia; Vincenzo Graziano; Sara Pagotto; Angelo Veronese; Cesidio Giuliani; Marco Marchisio; Paola Lanuti; Michele De Tursi; Maurizia D'Egidio; Pietro De Marino; Davide Brocco; Patrizia Vici; Laura De Lellis; Alessandro Cama; Clara Natoli; Nicola Tinari
Journal:  Cell Death Discov       Date:  2021-04-22

3.  MAB21L4 regulates the TGF-β-induced expression of target genes in epidermal keratinocytes.

Authors:  Tomohiro Ogami; Yusuke Tamura; Kim Toss; Keiko Yuki; Masato Morikawa; Shuichi Tsutsumi; Hiroyuki Aburatani; Keiji Miyazawa; Kohei Miyazono; Daizo Koinuma
Journal:  J Biochem       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.387

4.  ZEB1 and oncogenic Ras constitute a regulatory switch for stimulus-dependent E-cadherin downregulation.

Authors:  Shigeo Otake; Yuka Itoh; Chiho Omata; Masao Saitoh; Keiji Miyazawa
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 6.518

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.