| Literature DB >> 31480455 |
Chengchen Li1, Zeyuan Wang1, Theresa Hardy2, Yunfeng Huang1, Qin Hui1, Cindy A Crusto3,4, Michelle L Wright5,6, Jacquelyn Y Taylor2, Yan V Sun7,8,9.
Abstract
African American women are affected by earlier onset of age-associated health deteriorations and obesity disproportionally, but little is known about the mechanism linking body mass index (BMI) and biological aging among this population. DNA methylation age acceleration (DNAm AA), measuring the difference between DNA methylation age and chronological age, is a novel biomarker of the biological aging process, and predicts aging-related disease outcomes. The present study estimated cross-tissue DNA methylation age acceleration using saliva samples from 232 African American mothers. Cross-sectional regression analyses were performed to assess the association of BMI with DNAm AA. The average chronological age and DNA methylation age were 31.67 years, and 28.79 years, respectively. After adjusting for smoking, hypertension diagnosis history, and socioeconomic factors (education, marital status, household income), a 1 kg/m2 increase in BMI is associated with 0.14 years increment of DNAm AA (95% CI: (0.08, 0.21)). The conclusion: in African American women, high BMI is independently associated with saliva-based DNA methylation age acceleration, after adjusting for smoking, hypertension, and socioeconomic status. This finding supports that high BMI accelerates biological aging, and plays a key role in age-related disease outcomes among African American women.Entities:
Keywords: African American; BMI; DNA methylation age acceleration; aging; obesity
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31480455 PMCID: PMC6747309 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20174273
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Significant correlation between the chronological age and DNA methylation age in 232. African American women from InterGEN study. The grey line indicated the fitted line from the linear regression model.
Summary statistics of studied phenotypes and univariate regression on DNA methylation age acceleration (DNAm AA) from InterGEN mothers (sample size of 232).
| Characteristics | Mean (SD)/Median (IQR)/N (%) | β (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chronological age, years | 31.67 (5.70) | NA | |
| DNA methylation age, years | 28.79 (6.75) | NA | |
| DAge, years | −2.41 (4.33) | NA | |
| DNAm AA, years | −0.14 (−3.04–2.65) | NA | |
| Body Mass Index, kg/m2 | 29.69 (8.25) | 0.15 * (0.08, 0.21) | |
| Maternal cigarettes use | No | 179 (77.20) | (Ref) |
| Yes | 53 (22.80) | −0.73 (−2.05, 0.59) | |
| Education | <College | 94 (40.50) | (Ref) |
| College graduate or higher | 138 (59.50) | 0.77 (−0.36, 1.90) | |
| Annual household income, $ | <15,000 | 110 (47.41) | (Ref) |
| ≥15000 | 122 (52.59) | 0.19 (−0.93, 1.30) | |
| Marital Status | Married | 55 (23.70) | (Ref) |
| Single | 152 (65.50) | −0.28 (−1.62, 1.06) | |
| Others | 25 (10.80) | −0.41 (−2.46, 1.64) | |
| Ever diagnosed with hypertension | No | 185 (79.70) | (Ref) |
| Yes | 47(20.30) | 1.49 * (0.11, 2.86) | |
| BMI category | Normal and Underweight (<24.9 kg/m²) | 72 (31.00) | (Ref) |
| Overweight (25–29.9 kg/m²) | 58 (25.00) | 1.00 (−0.48, 2.47) | |
| Obese (≥30 kg/m²) | 102 (44.00) | 1.87 * (0.59, 3.16) | |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; Ref: reference group; ΔAge, the discrepancy between DNA methylation age and chronological age; DNAm AA, DNA methylation age acceleration, the residual resulting from regression DNA methylation age on chronological age in a linear model. * p-value < 0.05.
Figure 2Association between BMI and DNA methylation age acceleration with a univariate linear model (0.15 years increase in DNAm AA per 1 kg/m2 increase in BMI (p < 0.001)); and a cubic smoothing spline in 232 African American women from InterGEN study. The lines indicate the fitted values from the linear and spline regression models.
Results of cross-sectional multivariable analysis of association of BMI (kg/m2) or weight status, and DNAm AA (year) in study sample (n = 232) from InterGEN study.
| Association between DNAm AA and Obesity-Related Traits | Model 1 | Model 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| β coefficient (95% CI) for continuous BMI | 0.15 *** | 0.14 *** | |
| (0.09, 0.22) | (0.08, 0.21) | ||
| β coefficient (95% CI) for BMI Category | Normal and Underweight a | (Ref) | (Ref) |
| Overweight b | 1.23 | 1.13 | |
| (−0.024, 2.48) | (−0.13, 2.39) | ||
| Obese c | 2.01 * | 1.92 * | |
| (0.92, 3.10) | (0.82, 3.02) | ||
| Covariates adjusted for in the model | Annual household income, Education, Marital Status, Smoking, 10 Principal Components, 8 Inferred Cell Types | Model 1 + Hypertension Status | |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; Ref: reference group; DNAm AA, DNA methylation age acceleration. * p-value < 0.05. ** Both models include covariates: Annual household income, Education, Marital Status, and Smoking. *** p-value < 0.001. a Normal and underweight was defined as a BMI of <24.9 kg/m². b Overweight was defined as a BMI of ≥25 kg/m² and <30 kg/m². c Obesity was defined as a BMI of ≥30 kg/m².
Figure 3Forest plots for Horvath clock meta-analysis. Meta-analysis used regression coefficients and standard errors from three out of five studies investigating the association of BMI and Horvath’s DNA methylation aging markers. SMD: Standardized Mean Difference; Simpkin AJ 2017: Two tissues: Blood/buccal.