Literature DB >> 31473946

Badminton players show a lower coactivation and higher beta band intermuscular interactions of ankle antagonist muscles during isokinetic exercise.

Lejun Wang1, Wenxin Niu2, Kuan Wang3, Shengnian Zhang4, Li Li5, Tianfeng Lu6.   

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that skilled athletes may show a specific muscle activation pattern with a lower antagonist coactivation level. Based on the point, we hypothesize that the coupling of antagonistic muscles may be different between badminton players and non-skilled individuals during exercises. The current work was designed to verify the hypothesis. Ten male college students and eight male badminton players performed three maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVC) and a set of three maximal concentric ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexions at an angular velocity of 30°, 60°, 120°, and 180°/s. Surface electromyography (EMG) was recorded from the tibialis anterior (TA) and lateral gastrocnemius (LG) muscles during the test. Normalized average EMG amplitude and phase synchronization index (PSI) between surface EMG of TA and LG were calculated. Antagonist muscle coactivation was significantly lower (from 22.1% ± 9.4 and 10.7% ± 3.7 at 30°/s to 22.4% ± 9.7 and 10.6% ± 2.5 at 180°/s for non-players and badminton players group, respectively), and PSI in beta frequency band was significantly higher (from 0.42 ± 0.06 and 0.47 ± 0.15 at 30°/s to 0.35 ± 0.12 and 0.49 ± 0.14 at 180°/s) in the badminton player group compared with the non-player group during isokinetic ankle dorsiflexion contraction. No significant difference was found in antagonist muscle coactivation and PSI between two group subjects during ankle plantar flexion. The decrease of antagonist coactivation may indicate an optimal motor control style to increase the contraction efficiency, while the increase coupling of antagonistic muscles may help to ensure joint stability to compensate for the decrease of antagonist coactivation. Graphical abstract Significant difference of observed indexes between non-players and badminton players.

Keywords:  Ankle joint; Antagonist muscle; Badminton players; Coactivation; EMG; Isokinetic exercise

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31473946     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-019-02040-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  34 in total

1.  Electroencephalographic measurement of motor cortex control of muscle activity in humans.

Authors:  T Mima; J Steger; A E Schulman; C Gerloff; M Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  A simulation study to examine the use of cross-correlation as an estimate of surface EMG cross talk.

Authors:  Madeleine M Lowery; Nikolay S Stoykov; Todd A Kuiken
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2002-12-06

3.  Leg dominance is a risk factor for noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female recreational skiers.

Authors:  Gerhard Ruedl; Magdalena Webhofer; Kenneth Helle; Martin Strobl; Alois Schranz; Christian Fink; Hannes Gatterer; Martin Burtscher
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Filtering the surface EMG signal: Movement artifact and baseline noise contamination.

Authors:  Carlo J De Luca; L Donald Gilmore; Mikhail Kuznetsov; Serge H Roy
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Muscle fatigue-induced enhancement of corticomuscular coherence following sustained submaximal isometric contraction of the tibialis anterior muscle.

Authors:  Junichi Ushiyama; Masanori Katsu; Yoshihisa Masakado; Akio Kimura; Meigen Liu; Junichi Ushiba
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-03-10

Review 6.  The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG: an update.

Authors:  Dario Farina; Roberto Merletti; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2014-10-02

7.  Voluntary control of motor units in human antagonist muscles: coactivation and reciprocal activation.

Authors:  C J De Luca; B Mambrito
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Training-related decrease in antagonist muscles activation is associated with increased motor cortex activation: evidence of central mechanisms for control of antagonist muscles.

Authors:  Fabien Dal Maso; Marieke Longcamp; David Amarantini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  High-Frequency Intermuscular Coherence between Arm Muscles during Robot-Mediated Motor Adaptation.

Authors:  Sara Pizzamiglio; Martina De Lillo; Usman Naeem; Hassan Abdalla; Duncan L Turner
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Aging and Strength Training Influence Knee Extensor Intermuscular Coherence During Low- and High-Force Isometric Contractions.

Authors:  Simon Walker; Janne Avela; Jan Wikgren; Romain Meeusen; Harri Piitulainen; Stuart N Baker; Tiina M Parviainen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.566

View more
  2 in total

1.  Halo Sport Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improved Muscular Endurance Performance and Neuromuscular Efficiency During an Isometric Submaximal Fatiguing Elbow Flexion Task.

Authors:  Lejun Wang; Ce Wang; Hua Yang; Qineng Shao; Wenxin Niu; Ye Yang; Fanhui Zheng
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  A comparison of muscle activation and concomitant intermuscular coupling of antagonist muscles among bench presses with different instability degrees in untrained men.

Authors:  Lejun Wang; Minjie Qiao; Haifeng Tao; Xiaoqian Song; Qineng Shao; Ce Wang; Hua Yang; Wenxin Niu; Yiqing Chen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.755

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.