Literature DB >> 3655881

Voluntary control of motor units in human antagonist muscles: coactivation and reciprocal activation.

C J De Luca1, B Mambrito.   

Abstract

1. Myoelectric (ME) activity of several motor units was detected simultaneously from the human flexor pollicis longus and extensor pollicis longus muscles, the only two muscles that control the interphalangeal joint of the thumb. The ME signals were detected while the subjects produced isometric force outputs to track three different paradigms: triangular trajectories, random-force trajectories requiring both flexion and extension contractions, and net zero force resulting from stiffening the joint by voluntarily coactivating both muscles. 2. The ME signals were decomposed into their constituent motor-unit action potential trains. The firing rate behavior of the concurrently active motor units was studied using cross-correlation techniques. 3. During isometric contractions, the firing rates of motor units within a muscle were greatly cross-correlated with essentially zero time shift with respect to each other. This observation confirms our previous report of this behavior, which has been called common drive. Common drive was also found among the motor units of the agonist and antagonist muscles during voluntary coactivation to stiffen the interphalangeal joint. This observation suggests two interesting points: 1) that the common drive mechanism has a component of central origin, and 2) that the central nervous system may control the motoneuron pools of an agonist-antagonist muscle pair as if they were one pool when both are performing the same task. 4. During force reversals, the firing rates of motor units reverse in an orderly manner: earlier recruited motor units decrease their firing rate before later recruited motor units. This orderly reversal of firing rates is consistent with the concept of orderly recruitment and derecruitment. 5. A control scheme is suggested to explain the behavior of the motor units in both muscles during force reversal. It consists of centrally mediated reciprocally organized flexion and extension commands along with a common coactivation command to both muscles. This control scheme allows for coactivation and reciprocal activation of an agonist-antagonist set. 6. The agonist-antagonist pair was observed to generate a net force in two control modalities: proportional activation and reciprocal activation. In proportional activation, the agonist-antagonist set is coactivated during either of two states: when uncertainty exists in the required task or when a compensatory force contraction is perceived to be required.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3655881     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1987.58.3.525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  71 in total

1.  The unilateral and bilateral control of motor unit pairs in the first dorsal interosseous and paraspinal muscles in man.

Authors:  J F Marsden; S F Farmer; D M Halliday; J R Rosenberg; P Brown
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Efficient generation of reciprocal signals by inhibition.

Authors:  Sung-min Park; Esra Tara; Kamran Khodakhah
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The effectiveness of resistance training using unstable surfaces and devices for rehabilitation.

Authors:  David Behm; Juan Carlos Colado
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-04

4.  Task-dependent changes in gain of the reflex response to imperceptible perturbations of joint position in man.

Authors:  J Hore; D I McCloskey; J L Taylor
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Effects of torque disturbances on elbow joint movements evoked in unanesthetized cats by microstimulation of the motor cortex.

Authors:  A I Kostyukov; A N Tal'nov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Common synaptic input to the human hypoglossal motor nucleus.

Authors:  Christopher M Laine; E Fiona Bailey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Common drive to the upper airway muscle genioglossus during inspiratory loading.

Authors:  Michael J Woods; Christian L Nicholas; John G Semmler; Julia K M Chan; Amy S Jordan; John Trinder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Multifunctional and Context-Dependent Control of Vocal Acoustics by Individual Muscles.

Authors:  Kyle H Srivastava; Coen P H Elemans; Samuel J Sober
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Effect of training status on beta-range corticomuscular coherence in agonist vs. antagonist muscles during isometric knee contractions.

Authors:  Fabien Dal Maso; Marieke Longcamp; Sylvain Cremoux; David Amarantini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Muscle fatigue and electromyographic changes are not different in women and men matched for strength.

Authors:  Konstantinos Hatzikotoulas; Theophanis Siatras; Elma Spyropoulou; Ilias Paraschos; Dimitrios Patikas
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-04-09       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.