Literature DB >> 17881531

Auditory spatial perception dynamically realigns with changing eye position.

Babak Razavi1, William E O'Neill, Gary D Paige.   

Abstract

Audition and vision both form spatial maps of the environment in the brain, and their congruency requires alignment and calibration. Because audition is referenced to the head and vision is referenced to movable eyes, the brain must accurately account for eye position to maintain alignment between the two modalities as well as perceptual space constancy. Changes in eye position are known to variably, but inconsistently, shift sound localization, suggesting subtle shortcomings in the accuracy or use of eye position signals. We systematically and directly quantified sound localization across a broad spatial range and over time after changes in eye position. A sustained fixation task addressed the spatial (steady-state) attributes of eye position-dependent effects on sound localization. Subjects continuously fixated visual reference spots straight ahead (center), to the left (20 degrees), or to the right (20 degrees) of the midline in separate sessions while localizing auditory targets using a laser pointer guided by peripheral vision. An alternating fixation task focused on the temporal (dynamic) aspects of auditory spatial shifts after changes in eye position. Localization proceeded as in sustained fixation, except that eye position alternated between the three fixation references over multiple epochs, each lasting minutes. Auditory space shifted by approximately 40% toward the new eye position and dynamically over several minutes. We propose that this spatial shift reflects an adaptation mechanism for aligning the "straight-ahead" of perceived sensory-motor maps, particularly during early childhood when normal ocular alignment is achieved, but also resolving challenges to normal spatial perception throughout life.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17881531      PMCID: PMC6672669          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0938-07.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  36 in total

1.  Influence of static eye and head position on tone-evoked gaze shifts.

Authors:  Tom J Van Grootel; Marc M Van Wanrooij; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Relative sound localisation abilities in human listeners.

Authors:  Katherine C Wood; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Saccades create similar mislocalizations in visual and auditory space.

Authors:  Hannah M Krüger; Thérèse Collins; Bernhard Englitz; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Perisaccadic localization of auditory stimuli.

Authors:  Steffen Klingenhoefer; Frank Bremmer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effect of eye position during human visual-vestibular integration of heading perception.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Perception of auditory, visual, and egocentric spatial alignment adapts differently to changes in eye position.

Authors:  Qi N Cui; Babak Razavi; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Influence of aging on human sound localization.

Authors:  Marina S Dobreva; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Auditory perception is influenced by the orientation of the trunk relative to a sound source.

Authors:  Chiara Occhigrossi; Michael Brosch; Giorgia Giommetti; Roberto Panichi; Giampietro Ricci; Aldo Ferraresi; Mauro Roscini; Vito Enrico Pettorossi; Mario Faralli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Spatial receptive field shift by preceding cross-modal stimulation in the cat superior colliculus.

Authors:  Jinghong Xu; Tingting Bi; Jing Wu; Fanzhu Meng; Kun Wang; Jiawei Hu; Xiao Han; Jiping Zhang; Xiaoming Zhou; Les Keniston; Liping Yu
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Reference frame of the ventriloquism aftereffect.

Authors:  Norbert Kopco; I-Fan Lin; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.