Literature DB >> 31471456

From Somatic Variants Toward Precision Oncology: An Investigation of Reporting Practice for Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis.

Rongxue Peng1,2, Rui Zhang1,2, Martin P Horan3, Li Zhou1,2,4, Sze Yee Chai3, Nalishia Pillay3, Kwang Hong Tay3, Tony Badrick3, Jinming Li5,2,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the accelerated development of next-generation sequencing (NGS), identified variants, and targeted therapies, clinicians who confront the complicated and multifarious genetic information may not effectively incorporate NGS-based circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis into routine patient care. Consequently, standardized ctDNA testing reports are of vital importance. In an effort to guarantee high-quality reporting performance, we conducted an investigation of the current detection and reporting practices for NGS-based ctDNA analysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A set of simulated ctDNA samples with known variants at known allelic frequencies and a corresponding case scenario were distributed to 66 genetic testing laboratories for ctDNA analysis. Written reports were collected to evaluate the detection accuracy, reporting integrity, and information sufficiency using 21 predefined criteria.
RESULTS: Current reporting practices for NGS-based ctDNA analysis were found to be far from satisfactory, especially regarding testing interpretation and methodological details. Only 42.4% of laboratories reported the results in complete concordance with the expected results. Moreover, 74.2% of reports only listed aberrations with direct and well-known treatment consequences for the tumor type in question. Genetic aberrations for which experimental agents and/or drug access programs are available may thus be overlooked. Furthermore, methodological details for the interpretation of results were missing from the majority of reports (87.9%).
CONCLUSION: This proof-of-principle study suggests that the capacity for accurate identification of variants, rational interpretation of genotypes, comprehensive recommendation of potential medications, and detailed description of methodologies need to be further improved before ctDNA analysis can be formally implemented in the clinic. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Accurate, comprehensive, and standardized clinical sequencing reports can help to translate complex genetic information into patient-centered clinical decisions, thereby shepherding precision oncology into daily practice. However, standards, guidelines, and quality requirements for clinical reports of next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis are currently absent. By using a set of simulated clinical ctDNA samples and a corresponding case scenario, current practices were evaluated to identify deficiencies in clinical sequencing reports of ctDNA analysis. The recommendations provided here may serve as a roadmap for the improved implementation of NGS-based ctDNA analysis in the clinic. © AlphaMed Press 2019.

Keywords:  Circulating tumor DNA; Clinical reports; Next‐generation sequencing; Quality control; Standardization

Year:  2019        PMID: 31471456     DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  28 in total

1.  Circulating DNA Demonstrates Convergent Evolution and Common Resistance Mechanisms during Treatment of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Alain R Thierry; Brice Pastor; Zhi-Qin Jiang; Anastasia D Katsiampoura; Christine Parseghian; Jonathan M Loree; Michael J Overman; Cynthia Sanchez; Safia El Messaoudi; Marc Ychou; Scott Kopetz
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Quality Assessment of Reporting Performance for EGFR Molecular Diagnosis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Yanxi Han; Rui Zhang; Guigao Lin; Kuo Zhang; Jiehong Xie; Jinming Li
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-07-12

Review 3.  Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies.

Authors:  Sara Goodwin; John D McPherson; W Richard McCombie
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 4.  Next-Generation Sequencing Informatics: Challenges and Strategies for Implementation in a Clinical Environment.

Authors:  Somak Roy; William A LaFramboise; Yuri E Nikiforov; Marina N Nikiforova; Mark J Routbort; John Pfeifer; Rakesh Nagarajan; Alexis B Carter; Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  Results of the first external quality assessment scheme (EQA) for isolation and analysis of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA).

Authors:  Verena Haselmann; Parviz Ahmad-Nejad; Wolf J Geilenkeuser; Angelika Duda; Merle Gabor; Romy Eichner; Simon Patton; Michael Neumaier
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Usefulness of circulating free DNA for monitoring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: a case report.

Authors:  Clara Mayo de Las Casas; Maria Gonzalez-Cao; Santiago Viteri Ramirez; Nuria Jordana Ariza; Ariadna Balada; Mónica Garzón; Cristina Teixidó; Niki Karachaliou; Daniela Morales-Espinosa; Miguel Ángel Molina-Vila; Rafael Rosell
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-10

7.  Circulating tumoral DNA: Preanalytical validation and quality control in a diagnostic laboratory.

Authors:  Sergey Nikolaev; Laure Lemmens; Thibaud Koessler; Jean-Louis Blouin; Thierry Nouspikel
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 3.365

8.  Patient-Paired Sample Congruence Between 2 Commercial Liquid Biopsy Tests.

Authors:  Gonzalo Torga; Kenneth J Pienta
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 9.  Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Patients With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Joint Review.

Authors:  Jason D Merker; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Carolyn Compton; Maximilian Diehn; Patricia Hurley; Alexander J Lazar; Neal Lindeman; Christina M Lockwood; Alex J Rai; Richard L Schilsky; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; Patricia Vasalos; Brooke L Billman; Thomas K Oliver; Suanna S Bruinooge; Daniel F Hayes; Nicholas C Turner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Towards standardization of next-generation sequencing of FFPE samples for clinical oncology: intrinsic obstacles and possible solutions.

Authors:  Maxim Ivanov; Konstantin Laktionov; Valery Breder; Polina Chernenko; Ekaterina Novikova; Ekaterina Telysheva; Sergey Musienko; Ancha Baranova; Vladislav Mileyko
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.