Literature DB >> 31471231

Five-year reintervention after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

Jesse A Columbo1, Niveditta Ramkumar2, Pablo Martinez-Camblor2, Ravinder Kang2, Bjoern D Suckow3, A James O'Malley2, Art Sedrakyan4, Philip P Goodney5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients who undergo endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVR) remain at risk for reintervention and rupture. We sought to define the 5-year rate of reintervention and rupture after EVR in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI).
METHODS: We identified all patients in the VQI who underwent EVR from 2003 to 2015. We linked patients in the VQI to Medicare claims for long-term outcomes. We stratified patients on baseline clinical and procedural characteristics to identify those at risk for reintervention. Our primary outcomes were 5-year rates of reintervention and late aneurysm rupture after EVR. We assessed these with Kaplan-Meier survival estimation.
RESULTS: We studied 12,911 patients who underwent EVR. The mean age was 75.5 years, 79.9% were male, 3.9% were black, and 89.1% of operations were performed electively. The 5-year rate of reintervention for the entire cohort was 21%, and the 5-year rate of late aneurysm rupture was 3%. Reintervention rates varied across categories of EVR urgency. Patients who underwent EVR electively had the lowest 5-year rate of reintervention at 20%. Those who underwent surgery for symptomatic aneurysms had higher rates of reintervention at 25%. Patients undergoing EVR emergently for rupture had the highest rate of reintervention, 27% at 4 years (log-rank across the three groups, P < .001). Black race and aneurysm size of 6.0 cm or greater were associated with significantly elevated reintervention rates (black, 31% vs white, 20% [log-rank, P < .001]; aneurysm size 6.0 cm or greater, 27% vs all others, <20% [log-rank, P < .001]). There were no significant associations between age or gender and the 5-year rate of reintervention.
CONCLUSIONS: More than one in five Medicare patients undergo reintervention within 5 years after EVR in the VQI; late rupture remains low at 3%. Black patients, those with large aneurysms, and those who undergo EVR urgently and emergently have a higher likelihood of adverse outcomes and should be the focus of diligent long-term surveillance.
Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair; Long-term outcomes after EVR; Medicare claims; Reintervention; VQI-Medicare; Vascular Quality Initiative

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31471231      PMCID: PMC7042040          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.05.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  18 in total

1.  Postoperative Surveillance and Long-term Outcomes After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Trit Garg; Laurence C Baker; Matthew W Mell
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years' follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Rajesh Patel; Michael J Sweeting; Janet T Powell; Roger M Greenhalgh
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Endovascular aneurysm repair patients who are lost to follow-up have worse outcomes.

Authors:  Caitlin W Hicks; Devin S Zarkowsky; Ian C Bostock; David H Stone; James H Black; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Philip P Goodney; Mahmoud B Malas
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Follow-up compliance after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Andres Schanzer; Louis M Messina; Kaushik Ghosh; Jessica P Simons; William P Robinson; Francesco A Aiello; Robert J Goldberg; Allison B Rosen
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  A pilot study for long-term outcome assessment after aortic aneurysm repair using Vascular Quality Initiative data matched to Medicare claims.

Authors:  Andrew W Hoel; Adrienne E Faerber; Kayla O Moore; Niveditta Ramkumar; Benjamin S Brooke; Salvatore T Scali; Art Sedrakyan; Philip P Goodney
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 6.  Endovascular vs Open Aneurysm Repair in the Young: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nikolaos Kontopodis; Stavros A Antoniou; Efstratios Georgakarakos; Christos V Ioannou
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.487

7.  Long-term durability of open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Mark F Conrad; Robert S Crawford; Juan D Pedraza; David C Brewster; Glenn M Lamuraglia; Michael Corey; Suhny Abbara; Richard P Cambria
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 8.  A Systematic Review of Predictors of Reintervention After EVAR: Guidance for Risk-Stratified Surveillance.

Authors:  Shaneel R Patel; Chris Allen; Matthew J Grima; Jack R W Brownrigg; Benjamin O Patterson; Peter J E Holt; Matt M Thompson; Alan Karthikesalingam
Journal:  Vasc Endovascular Surg       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 1.089

Review 9.  Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Sharath Chandra Vikram Paravastu; Rubaraj Jayarajasingam; Rachel Cottam; Simon J Palfreyman; Jonathan A Michaels; Steven M Thomas
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-01-23

10.  Predicting risk of rupture and rupture-preventing reinterventions following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  I Grootes; J K Barrett; P Ulug; F Rohlffs; S J Laukontaus; R Tulamo; M Venermo; R M Greenhalgh; M J Sweeting
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  4 in total

1.  Racial Disparities Associated With Reinterventions After Elective Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

Authors:  Dominique Vervoort; Joseph K Canner; Elliott R Haut; James H Black; Christopher J Abularrage; Devin S Zarkowsky; James C Iannuzzi; Caitlin W Hicks
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 2.  "Modern Endovascular Therapy".

Authors:  Matthew Blecha; Vivian Gahtan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Endovascular versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm: a claims-based data analysis in Japan.

Authors:  Yuki Kimura; Hiroshi Ohtsu; Naohiro Yonemoto; Nobuyoshi Azuma; Kazuhiro Sase
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2022-07-29

4.  Survival, reintervention and surveillance reports: long-term, centre-level evaluation and feedback of vascular interventions.

Authors:  Xavier Philip Fowler; Barbara Gladders; Kayla Moore; Jialin Mao; Art Sedrakyan; Philip Goodney
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2022-10-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.