Literature DB >> 25441010

Follow-up compliance after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare beneficiaries.

Andres Schanzer1, Louis M Messina2, Kaushik Ghosh3, Jessica P Simons2, William P Robinson2, Francesco A Aiello2, Robert J Goldberg2, Allison B Rosen4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Lifelong imaging follow-up is essential to the safe and appropriate management of patients who undergo endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). We sought to evaluate the rate of compliance with imaging follow-up after EVAR and to identify factors associated with being lost to imaging follow-up.
METHODS: We identified a 20% sample of continuously enrolled Medicare beneficiaries who underwent EVAR between 2001 and 2008. Using data through 2010 from Medicare Inpatient, Outpatient, and Carrier files, we identified all abdominal imaging studies that may have been performed for EVAR follow-up. Patients were considered lost to annual imaging follow-up if they did not undergo any abdominal imaging study within their last 2 years of follow-up. Multivariable models were constructed to identify independent factors associated with being lost to annual imaging follow-up.
RESULTS: Among 19,962 patients who underwent EVAR, the incidence of loss to annual imaging follow-up at 5 years after EVAR was 50%. Primary factors associated with being lost to annual imaging follow-up were advanced age (age 65-69 years, reference; age 75-79 years: hazard ratio [HR], 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.32; age 80-85 years: HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.35-1.55; age >85 years: HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.88-2.20) and presentation with an urgent/emergent intact aneurysm (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.20-1.35) or ruptured aneurysm (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.63-2.08). Additional independent factors included several previously diagnosed chronic diseases and South and West regions of the United States.
CONCLUSIONS: Annual imaging follow-up compliance after EVAR in the United States is significantly below recommended levels. Quality improvement efforts to encourage improved compliance with imaging follow-up, especially in older patients with multiple comorbidities and in those who underwent EVAR urgently or for rupture, are necessary.
Copyright © 2015 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25441010      PMCID: PMC4276501          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  15 in total

1.  Rate and predictability of graft rupture after endovascular and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: data from the EVAR Trials.

Authors:  Thomas R Wyss; Louise C Brown; Janet T Powell; Roger M Greenhalgh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Age-related trends in utilization and outcome of open and endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm in the United States, 2001-2006.

Authors:  Margaret L Schwarze; Yang Shen; Joshua Hemmerich; William Dale
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 3.  The care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: the Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines.

Authors:  Elliot L Chaikof; David C Brewster; Ronald L Dalman; Michel S Makaroun; Karl A Illig; Gregorio A Sicard; Carlos H Timaran; Gilbert R Upchurch; Frank J Veith
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  What determines and are the consequences of surveillance intensity after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair?

Authors:  Lina J Leurs; Robert J F Laheij; Jaap Buth
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.466

6.  Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data.

Authors:  C N Klabunde; A L Potosky; J M Legler; J L Warren
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Lost to follow-up: a potential under-appreciated limitation of endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Wesley B Jones; Spence M Taylor; Corey A Kalbaugh; Charles S Joels; Dawn W Blackhurst; Eugene M Langan; Bruce H Gray; Jerry R Youkey
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Mortality results for randomised controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. The UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-11-21       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Frank A Lederle; Julie A Freischlag; Tassos C Kyriakides; Frank T Padberg; Jon S Matsumura; Ted R Kohler; Peter H Lin; Jessie M Jean-Claude; Dolores F Cikrit; Kathleen M Swanson; Peter N Peduzzi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Compliance with long-term surveillance recommendations following endovascular aneurysm repair or type B aortic dissection.

Authors:  Marcus R Kret; Amir F Azarbal; Erica L Mitchell; Timothy K Liem; Gregory J Landry; Gregory L Moneta
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 4.268

View more
  17 in total

1.  Endovascular aneurysm repair patients who are lost to follow-up have worse outcomes.

Authors:  Caitlin W Hicks; Devin S Zarkowsky; Ian C Bostock; David H Stone; James H Black; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Philip P Goodney; Mahmoud B Malas
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Longer Patient Travel Times Associated with Decreased Follow-Up after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair (EVAR).

Authors:  Andrew D Morris; Joshua E Preiss; Samuel Ogbuchi; Shipra Arya; Yazan Duwayri; Thomas F Dodson; William D Jordan; Luke P Brewster
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Association of Quality Improvement Registry Participation With Appropriate Follow-up After Vascular Procedures.

Authors:  Benjamin S. Brooke; Adam W. Beck; Larry W. Kraiss; Andrew W. Hoel; Andrea M. Austin; Amir A. Ghaffarian; Jack L. Cronenwett; Philip P. Goodney
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 14.766

4.  Compliance of postendovascular aortic aneurysm repair imaging surveillance.

Authors:  Ali F AbuRahma; Michael Yacoub; Stephen M Hass; Joseph AbuRahma; Albeir Y Mousa; L Scott Dean; Ravi Viradia; Patrick A Stone
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  A comparison of reintervention rates after endovascular aneurysm repair between the Vascular Quality Initiative registry, Medicare claims, and chart review.

Authors:  Jesse A Columbo; Ravinder Kang; Andrew W Hoel; Jeanwan Kang; Kathleen A Leinweber; Karissa S Tauber; Regis Hila; Niveditta Ramkumar; Art Sedrakyan; Philip P Goodney
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 6.  Transitions of care and long-term surveillance after vascular surgery.

Authors:  Andrew W Hoel; Kimberly C Zamor
Journal:  Semin Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 7.  Abdominal aortic aneurysms in women.

Authors:  Ruby C Lo; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Five-year reintervention after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

Authors:  Jesse A Columbo; Niveditta Ramkumar; Pablo Martinez-Camblor; Ravinder Kang; Bjoern D Suckow; A James O'Malley; Art Sedrakyan; Philip P Goodney
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Factors Affecting Follow-Up Compliance in Patients After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

Authors:  Patrick T Jasinski; Nicos Labropoulos; Olympia G Christoforatos; Apostolos K Tassiopoulos
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2017-10-01

10.  Characterization of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Surveillance in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

Authors:  Zachary J Wanken; Spencer W Trooboff; Barbara Gladders; Jesse A Columbo; Niveditta Ramkumar; Andrea M Austin; David H Stone; Matthew W Mell; Art Sedrakyan; Philip P Goodney
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.