Literature DB >> 17903647

Long-term durability of open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Mark F Conrad1, Robert S Crawford, Juan D Pedraza, David C Brewster, Glenn M Lamuraglia, Michael Corey, Suhny Abbara, Richard P Cambria.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In multiple comparisons of open vs endovascular (EVAR) repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms, the prior assumption that open repair produced superior durability has been challenged by advocates of EVAR. Although focus on EVAR reintervention has been intense, few contemporary studies document late outcomes after open repair; this was the goal of this study.
METHODS: From January 1994 to December 1998 (chosen to ensure a minimum 5-year follow-up), 540 patients underwent elective open repair. Surveillance imaging (computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging scans) was obtained for 152 (57%) of the 269 patients who remained alive at a mean follow-up of 87 months. Study end points included freedom from graft-related interventions and aneurysm-related and overall survival (Kaplan-Meier test); factors predictive of these end points were determined by multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: The mean age at operation was 73 years. A total of 76% of patients were male; 11% had renal insufficiency (creatinine > or =1.5 mg/dL), and 13% had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The aortic cross-clamp position was suprarenal in 135 (25%) patients, and 284 (53%) of patients had bifurcated grafts placed. Operative mortality (30 days) was 3%, and the median length of hospital stay was 7 days. Postoperative complications occurred in 68 (13%) patients. Predictors of postoperative complications included a history of myocardial infarction (hazard ratio [HR], 2.0; P = .01) and renal insufficiency (HR, 2.5; P = .02). The mean follow-up for all patients was 87 months. Actuarial survival was 70.7% +/- 2% and 44.3% +/- 2.4% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Negative predictors of long-term survival included advanced age (HR, 1.1; P < .001), history of myocardial infarction (HR, 1.37; P = .02), and renal insufficiency (HR, 1.5; P = .04). Freedom from graft-related reintervention was 98.2% +/- 0.8% and 94.3% +/- 3.4% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. There were 13 late graft-related complications in 11 (2%) patients (mean follow-up, 7.2 years). Findings included seven anastomotic pseudoaneurysms (five were repaired), four graft limb occlusions, and two graft infections. Aneurysms were identified in noncontiguous arterial segments in 68 (45%) of 152 patients, most of which involved the iliac arteries and required no treatment because of small size. Late aortic aneurysms proximal to the repair were identified in 24% of patients, and 29 (19%) patients had multiple late synchronous aneurysms.
CONCLUSIONS: Open repair remains a safe and durable option for the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms, with an excellent associated 10-year survival in patients who undergo operation at 75 years of age or younger. In addition, the freedom from graft-related reintervention is superior to that of EVAR. Finally, continued surveillance after open repair is appropriate and should be directed toward the detection of other aneurysms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17903647     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.05.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  20 in total

1.  Quantitative assessment of glucose metabolism in the vessel wall of abdominal aortic aneurysms: correlation with histology and role of partial volume correction.

Authors:  Christian Reeps; Ralph A Bundschuh; Jaroslav Pellisek; Michael Herz; Sandra van Marwick; Markus Schwaiger; Hans-Henning Eckstein; Stephan G Nekolla; Markus Essler
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Understanding the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Helena Kuivaniemi; Evan J Ryer; James R Elmore; Gerard Tromp
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2015

3.  Innovative chimney-graft technique for endovascular repair of a pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Edgar Luis Galiñanes; Eduardo A Hernandez-Vila; Zvonimir Krajcer
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2015-02-01

Review 4.  Postoperative imaging of the aorta.

Authors:  Weier Li; Sasiprapa Rongthong; Anand M Prabhakar; Sandeep Hedgire
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-04

5.  Sex differences in mortality and morbidity following repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Sarah E Deery; Peter A Soden; Sara L Zettervall; Katie E Shean; Thomas C F Bodewes; Alexander B Pothof; Ruby C Lo; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 6.  Management of Aortic Aneurysms: Is Surgery of Historic Interest Only?

Authors:  J Michael Bacharach; Emily A Wood; David P Slovut
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Clinical outcome of early relaparotomy after elective open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Youngjin Han; Tae-Won Kwon; Gi-Young Ko; Hojong Park; Ji Yoon Choi; Yong-Pil Cho
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 1.859

8.  Comparison of costs of endovascular repair versus open surgical repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm in Korea.

Authors:  Sang Il Min; Seung-Kee Min; Sanghyun Ahn; Suh Min Kim; Daedo Park; Taejin Park; Jin Wook Chung; Jae Hyung Park; Jongwon Ha; Sang Joon Kim; In Mok Jung
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Ten-year comparison of all-cause mortality after endovascular or open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Hong-Gi Lee; Daniel G Clair; Kenneth Ouriel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Postoperative renal dysfunction independently predicts late mortality in patients undergoing aortic reconstruction.

Authors:  Virendra I Patel; Robert T Lancaster; Emel Ergul; Mark F Conrad; Daniel Bertges; Marc Schermerhorn; Philip Goodney; Richard P Cambria
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.268

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.