| Literature DB >> 31470574 |
Michele R Machado1,2, Fernanda Kamp3,4, Juliana C Nunes1,5, Tatiana El-Bacha1,6,7, Alexandre G Torres8.
Abstract
Our aims were to investigate vitamin A and E status during lactation and the determinants of breast milk content for the appropriate nutrition of the infant in a study with nursing Brazilian women. We hypothesized that both inadequate intake and the lipoprotein distribution of vitamin A and E during lactation could have an impact on their breast milk levels from early- to mid-lactation. Nineteen adult lactating women participated in this longitudinal observational study, in which dietary records, blood and mature breast milk samples were collected for the analysis of vitamin A and E, and carotenoids in early- (2nd to 4th week) and mid-lactation (12th to 14th week). Nutrient intake was balanced by the Multiple Source Method (MSM), and the intake of vitamin A and E was inadequate in 74 and 100% of the women, respectively. However, these results were not reflected in low serum concentrations of retinol and only 37% of the volunteers were vitamin E deficient according to the blood biomarker. As lactation progressed, vitamin A and E status worsened, and this was clearly observed by the decrease in their content in breast milk. The reduced content of vitamin A and E in the breast milk was not related to their distribution in lipoproteins. Taken together, the contents of vitamin A and E in breast milk seemed to be more sensitive markers of maternal nutrition status than respective blood concentrations, and dietary assessment by the MSM in early lactation was sensitive to indicate later risks of deficiency and should support maternal dietary guidance to improve the infant's nutrition.Entities:
Keywords: breast milk; dietary assessment; inadequate intake; multiple source method; nutritional status; retinol; undernourishment; α-tocopherol
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31470574 PMCID: PMC6770016 DOI: 10.3390/nu11092025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
General characteristics of adult Brazilian lactating women in early- (2nd to 4th week) and mid-lactation (12th to 14th week) (n = 19).
| Characteristics | Lactation Period |
| Recommended Value or Range 1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early Lactation 2nd–4th Week | Mid-Lactation 12th–14th Week | |||
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 25.9 ± 4.0 | 25.3 ± 4.2 | 0.068 * | 18–24.9 [ |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 11.6 ± 1.7 | 12.5± 1.6 | 0.029 * | ≥12.0 [ |
| Hematocrit (%) | 39.2 ± 3.5 | 37.8 ± 3.5 | 0.131 | ≥36 [ |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 74.7 ± 21.4 | 57.0 ± 21.2 | 0.007 * | <150 [ |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 190.2 ± 41.9 | 182.2 ± 41.0 | 0.219 | <200 [ |
| LDL-c (mg/dL) | 156.0 ± 44.1 | 146.6 ± 35.9 | 0.164 | 100–129 [ |
| HDL-c (mg/dL) | 34.2 ± 6.2 | 35.6 ± 9.4 | 0.601 | >60 [ |
Data presented as the mean ± standard deviation; * Significant differences between lactation periods, paired t-test. 1 Shown in the same respective units as the first column.
Intake of energy and nutrients by Brazilian nursing women from the 2nd to the 14th week of lactation.
| Energy and Nutrients | Intake (24hR-MSM) | Inadequacy (%) 3 | Nutrient Intake Adequacy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference Value (Daily Intake) 4 | Method [Ref.] | |||
| Energy (kcal) | 1577 ± 164 1 | 53 | — | BMI distribution [ |
| Carbohydrate (en%) | 51.2 ± 7.7 1 | 21 | 160 g 5 | EAR cut-off [ |
| Protein (en%) | 17.7 ± 3.1 1 | 47 | 1.05 g/kg 5 | EAR cut-off [ |
| Total lipids (en%) | 31.1 ± 0.52 1 | 26 | 20 to 35 | AMDR [ |
| Vitamin A (μg RE) | 824.7 ± 21.8 1 | 74 | 900 | EAR cut-off [ |
| β-Carotene (μg) | 3249 (1408–6707) 2 | — | 3000–6000 [ | — |
| α-Carotene (μg) | 1053 (56–3712) 2 | — | — | — |
| Lycopene (μg) | 1854 (302–6472) 2 | — | ≥5000 [ | — |
| Lutein + zeaxanthin (μg) | 2446 (872–4873) 2 | — | — | — |
| Vitamin E (mg) | 4.4 ± 0.9 1 | 100 | 16 | EAR cut-off [ |
1 Data expressed as the mean ± standard deviation; 2 Median (minimum–maximum); 3 Estimated frequency of volunteers with inadequate intake; 4 based on estimated average requirement values whenever available, and are in the same units as the first column, except stated otherwise; in the case of carotenoids (β-carotene and lycopene), the reference value was taken as the daily intake level considered prudent for maintaining health; 5 EAR is used to assess adequacy of carbohydrate and protein intake, but usual intake expressed as en% are, respectively 45–65 and 5–10 [14]. AMDR: acceptable macronutrient distribution ranges; en%: macronutrient intake as a percentage of energy intake; 24hR-MSM: two 24-h recalls were used, and data were assessed by the Multiple Source Method; BMI: body mass index; EAR: Estimated Average Requirement.
Concentrations of fat-soluble vitamins (µmol/L) in the serum and breast milk of adult Brazilian nursing women (n = 19), in early- (2nd to 4th week) and mid- (12th to 14th week) lactation, and respective cut-off values for inadequacy 1.
| Vitamin | Serum | Breast Milk | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lactation Period | Undernutrition Cut-Off Value | Lactation Period | Inadequacy Cut-Off Value | |||||
| 2nd–4th Week | 12th–14th Week |
| 2nd–4th Week | 12th–14th Week |
| |||
| Retinol | 1.50 ± 0.30 | 1.48 ± 0.31 | 0.913 | 0.7 [ | 2.3 ± 0.78 | 2.0 ± 0.72 | 0.013 * | 1.05 [ |
| β-Carotene | 0.61 ± 0.07 | 0.59 ± 0.05 | 0.628 | — | 0.17 ± 0.02 | 0.14 ± 0.3 | 0.001 * | — |
| α-Carotene | 0.43 ± 0.09 | 0.44 ± 0.08 | 0.720 | — | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.304 | — |
| Lycopene | 0.20 ± 0.03 | 0.18 ± 0.04 | 0.530 | — | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.00 | 1.000 | — |
| Lutein + zeaxanthin | 0.24 ± 0.04 | 0.23 ± 0.07 | 0.633 | — | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.026 * | — |
| α-Tocopherol | 11.1 ± 1.11 | 10.1 ± 1.23 | 0.089 | 11.6 [ | 1.29 ± 0.25 | 1.07 ± 0.13 | 0.001 * | 7.4 [ |
| γ-Tocopherol | 0.76 ± 0.15 | 0.75 ± 0.13 | 0.896 | — | 0.38 ± 0.04 | 0.35 ± 0.04 | 0.436 | — |
1 Data expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. * Significant differences between lactation periods, paired t-test.
Multiple regression models of the concentrations of vitamin A and E (μmol/L) in the milk of Brazilian nursing women (n = 19), to assess its associations with the intake 1 and serum contents of these vitamins.
| Model N | Dependent Variable | Independent Variables | Coefficients | Weight in the Model 3 | Adj. | Error (%) 4 |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value |
| |||||||
| Early-Lactation: 2nd–4th Week | ||||||||
| 1 | Retinol | Vitamin A B | 5.33 × 10−3 | <0.0001 | 100% | 94.9 | 9% | <0.0001 |
| 2 | β-Carotene | β-Carotene A | 2.25 × 10−1 | 0.0045 | 63% | 87.7 | 14% | <0.0001 |
| β-Carotene B | 2.52 × 10−5 | 0.0430 | 37% | |||||
| 3 | α-Tocopherol | α-Tocopherol A | 1.24 | <0.0001 | 100% | 96.2 | 18% | <0.0001 |
| Mid-Lactation: 12th–14th Week | ||||||||
| 4 | Retinol | Vitamin A B | 4.79 × 10−3 | <0.0001 | 100% | 94.7 | 14% | <0.0001 |
| 5 | β-Carotene | β-Carotene A | 2.34 × 10−1 | <0.0001 | 100% | 78.4 | 17% | <0.0001 |
| 6 | α-Tocopherol | α-Tocopherol A | 1.03 | <0.0001 | 100% | 97.9 | 12% | <0.0001 |
1 Data from the average of two 24-h recalls corrected by the Multiple Source Method (Vitamin A, μg RE/day; β-Carotene, μg/day); 2 Concentrations of fat-soluble vitamins in milk; 3 Weight in the model = independent variable coefficient × variable average content in samples; 4 Relative error of estimate = (estimated absolute error × 100%)/average value of the dependent variable; 5 Model significance. Superscript letters indicate whether the vitamins included as independent variables in the model were serum concentration (A) or dietary intake (B). Variables included in the starting analysis matrices before running the backward stepwise regression analysis (p-to-remove ≥ 0.05): model 1, vitamin A intake (RE), serum retinol and fat intake; model 2, β-carotene intake and serum β-carotene; model 3, vitamin E intake and serum α-tocopherol; model 4, vitamin A intake (RE), serum retinol and fat intake; model 5, β-carotene intake and serum β-carotene; model 6, vitamin E intake and serum α-tocopherol. Adj. R2: adjusted coefficient of determination for the fitted model.
Figure 1Distribution of fat-soluble vitamins in blood serum lipoprotein fractions in early- and mid-lactation. * Significantly different from the contents (%) in the HDL fraction (paired t-test; p < 0.05). Error bars represent standard deviations.