Literature DB >> 31468203

Pre-operative hypoalbuminemia is associated with complication rate and overall survival in patients with vulvar cancer undergoing surgery.

Christine Bekos1, Stephan Polterauer2,3, Veronika Seebacher1, Thomas Bartl1, Elmar Joura1, Alexander Reinthaller1,4, Alina Sturdza5, Reinhard Horvat6, Richard Schwameis1, Christoph Grimm1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Hypoalbuminemia, a known marker for malnutrition, has been associated with an increased risk for perioperative morbidity and poor prognosis in patients with solid tumors. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic and predictive value of pre-treatment serum albumin levels for survival and postoperative complications in patients with vulvar cancer undergoing surgery.
METHODS: Within in this retrospective study, we assessed data of 103 consecutive patients with vulvar cancer undergoing primary surgery into this study. Pre-treatment serum albumin levels were correlated with clinico-pathological parameters and complications. We performed univariate log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression models to evaluate the association between pre-treatment serum albumin and survival.
RESULTS: We found hypoalbuminemia (< 35 mg/dl) in 9 of 103 (8.7%) patients. No difference in tumor characteristics was observed between patients with hypoalbuminemia and normal serum albumin levels. Difference in postoperative complications (55.6% and 37.8% of patients with hypoalbuminemia and normal serum albumin levels, respectively) was not statistically significant (p = 0.345). Shorter overall survival (OS) was observed in patients with hypoalbuminemia (5-year OS rate 17.1%) when compared to patients with normal serum albumin levels (5-year OS rate 58.6%, p = 0.004). In multivariable analysis, age (p = 0.017), FIGO stage (p = 0.011) and serum albumin levels (p = 0.013) were independently associated with OS.
CONCLUSION: Pre-treatment hypoalbuminemia is an independent prognostic biomarker for OS in patients with vulvar cancer. We did not find an association between pre-treatment hypoalbuminemia and a higher risk for postoperative complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Albumin; Complication; Hypoalbuminemia; Prognosis; Vulvar cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31468203      PMCID: PMC6759670          DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05278-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


Introduction

Vulvar cancer is a rare disease, but the incidence has increased over the last 30 years [1]. Although this malignancy is mostly diagnosed in elderly patients, mean age at diagnosis is decreasing steadily [2]. Various prognostic parameters have been evaluated in vulvar cancer, but none of these has entered clinical practice to date [3-5]. Albumin is one of the most important proteins maintaining the colloid osmotic pressure, scavenging free radicals, providing ligand binding and drug transport, effecting vascular permeability and participating in intracellular pathways [6-8]. A reduced serum albumin concentration is associated with poor outcome in sepsis, heart failure, renal disease and cancer [9-11]. Various causes of hypoalbuminemia in patients with cancer have been described. The most important cause is an increased catabolism and following cachexia [12]. Furthermore, increased vascular permeability contributes to a shift of albumin from the intravascular sector towards the interstitium, leading to decreased serum albumin levels [13]. Comorbidities associated with cancer, such as sepsis, chronic liver or renal disease and gastrointestinal bleeding can also contribute to hypoalbuminemia by various mechanisms [14]. Hypoalbuminemia has been found to be of prognostic value in patients with endometrial [15], ovarian [16] and colorectal cancer [17]. In vulvar cancer patients, hypoalbuminemia has been shown to be associated with major postoperative wound complications [18]. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between pre-treatment serum albumin and postoperative complications and prognosis in patients with vulvar cancer undergoing surgery.

Materials and methods

Patients

309 consecutive patients diagnosed with and treated for vulvar cancer between 1996 and 2016 at the Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna were initially identified. 175 had to be excluded due to missing laboratory results. 31 patients had to be excluded because they did not receive surgical therapy. Finally, 103 patients were enrolled in the present study. Data were retrospectively extracted from paper-based and electronic medical records. Prior to treatment, physical examination by a specialist in internal medicine was conducted and blood tests including serum albumin levels were performed as part of clinical routine in all patients. Patients with signs of inflammation or chronic liver disease were excluded from the study. Signs of inflammation were accessed searching for increased CRP concentrations, increased leucocyte counts or clinical signs of inflammation such as fever. The diagnosis of vulvar cancer was established by punch biopsy prior to surgery. Uniform criteria for surgical procedure terminology, pathologic variables, and sites of recurrence were used. Disease staging was based on the FIGO 2009 classification system [19]. Depending on the size of the lesion and the treating physician’s choice, patients underwent radical local excision, modified radical hemivulvectomy, modified radical posterior vulvectomy, modified radical anterior vulvectomy or radical vulvectomy. Groin lymph node dissection was performed if cancer invasion depth was > 1 mm. Ipsilateral lymph node dissection was performed for lateral lesions without clinically suspicious groins. Bilateral lymph node dissection was performed for midline lesions or when positive lymph nodes were suspected/found. Patients with smaller tumors (< 4 cm) were candidates for sentinel lymph node dissection using dual-staining with technetium 99 and blue dye application for detection. Active vacuum drainage with a diameter of 10–14 mm was used for groin surgery depending on the extent of lymphadenectomy. When the drainage fluid was lower than approximately 50 ml, the vacuum was removed and 1 day afterwards the drainage was removed. Patients were instructed to clean local wounds by showering with warm water at least twice a day, resorbable sutures were used and were not removed. In selected cases local metronidazol was used for wound cleaning. In selected cases with high risk for wound infection prophylactic antibiotic was used. Patient’s instruction was based on recent findings showing decreased symptom prevalence in women with counselling using evidence-based counseling guideline [20]. In cases of lymph node involvement, postoperative radiotherapy was applied according to standardized treatment protocols. Postoperative complications were graded according to the Clavien–Dindo classification [21]. Patients’ continuous follow up was until hospital discharge. Afterwards follow-up was carried out every 3 months for the first year, every 6 months until the fifth year and annually up to 10 years. Complications risen after hospital discharge were assessed in our outpatient clinic. Follow up visits included vulvoscopy, vagino-rectal and groin palpation, and evaluation of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC). If any clinically suspicious lesion and/or tumor marker elevation was detected, biopsy and/or computed tomography was performed. Following standard clinical guidelines, recurrent disease was either diagnosed by biopsy or suspected by imaging methods. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Vienna (IRB approval number: 1901/2017) before the study was initiated. Since this study was a retrospective analysis the ethics committee waived the requirement to obtain distinct informed consent from patients. The database with patients’ records was anonymized and de-identified prior to analysis.

Albumin measurement

Blood samples (citrated plasma) for evaluation of serum albumin levels were taken by peripheral venous puncture within routinely performed blood tests prior to treatment. Serum albumin was assayed with bromocresol green using routine clinical chemical photometric analyzers [22]. By our institution’s laboratory, the normal range for serum albumin levels is defined between 35 and 52 mg/dl.

Statistical analysis

Values are presented as mean values with standard deviation (SD) or total numbers or percentages (%). To compare mean serum albumin levels with clinico-pathological parameters Students’ T tests and one-way ANOVA tests were performed. p values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. To evaluate the independent risk factors for complication (CDC 1–5) binary logistic regression was performed, using all well-established parameters. To rule out a potential bias regarding prognostic value of hypoalbuminemia on OS patients, who died within 30 days after surgery, were excluded from this survival analysis. With respect to overall survival, differences between groups were tested using the log-rank test and presented as Kaplan–Meier survival curves. Multivariable analysis was performed using a Cox regression model including as independent variables serum albumin levels (dichotomized at 35.0 mg/dl), patients’ age (dichotomized at the median value of 68.2 years), tumor stage (FIGO III and IV vs. FIGO II vs. FIGO I), tumor grade (G3 vs. G2 vs. G1) and histology (squamous cell carcinoma vs. others) as independent variables. Statistical analyses were performed using the statistical software SPSS 24.0 for MAC (SPSS 24.0, IBM Inc., Armonk, NY).

Results

Patients’ demographics are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Patients' characteristics in 103 patients with vulvar cancer

ParameterN (%) or mean (SD)
Total number of patients enrolled103
Age at diagnosis (years)69.04 (13.97)
ECOG status
 040 (38.8%)
 126 (25.2%)
 25 (4.9%)
 34 (3.9%)
 Unknown28 (27.2%)
BMI28.34 (5.10)
Histological type
 Squamous cell carcinoma97 (94.2%)
 Others6 (5.8%)
Histological grade
 G124 (23.3%)
 G263 (61.2%)
 G316 (15.5%)
Tumor stage
 FIGO IA17 (16.5%)
 FIGO IB45 (43.7%)
 FIGO II10 (9.7%)
 FIGO IIIA13 (12.6%)
 FIGO IIIB9 (8.7%)
 FIGO IIIC5 (4.9%)
 FIGO IVA4 (3.9%)
Treatment—surgery
 Radical local excision35 (34.0%)
 Modified radical hemivulvectomy18 (17.5%)
 Modified radical posterior vulvectomy10 (9.7%)
 Modified radical anterior vulvectomy31 (30.1%)
 Radical vulvectomy9 (8.7%)
Lymphadenectomy—surgery
 No lymphadenectomy20 (19.4%)
 Unilateral lymph node dissection24 (23.3%)
 Bilateral lymph node dissection59 (57.3%)
 Systematic lymph node dissection (per groin)66 (46.5%)
 Sentinel lymph node dissection (per groin)76 (53.5%)
Lymph node involvement
 Negative or not evaluated75 (72.8%)
 Positive28 (27.2%)
Recurrence status
 No. of patients with recurrent disease37 (35.9%)
Type of recurrence
 Local28 (27.2%)
 Distant8 (7.7%)
Mean time to recurrent disease (months)35.43 (34.80)
Status at last observation
 Alive with no evidence of disease or stable disease56 (54.4%)
 Progressive disease5 (4.9%)
 Tumor related death22 (21.4%)
 Dead as a result of other causes20 (19.4%)
Mean time of follow-up (months)44.08 (37.10)

SD standard deviation, FIGO International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, CDC Clavien–Dindo Classification

Patients' characteristics in 103 patients with vulvar cancer SD standard deviation, FIGO International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, CDC Clavien–Dindo Classification Mean age of patients was 69.04 and was therefore used as cut-off. In the present study mean (SD) pre-treatment serum albumin was 41.34 (5.57) mg/dl. 9 (8.7%) patients were found to have hypoalbuminemia. No difference in tumor characteristics was observed between patients with hypoalbuminemia and normal serum albumin levels. Mean albumin values broken down by clinico-pathological parameters are provided in Table 2.
Table 2

Relationship between clinico-pathological parameters and serum albumin in 103 patients with vulvar cancer

Albumin ≤ 35 mg/dlAlbumin > 35 mg/dlp value1
Tumor stage0.577
 FIGO I4 (44.4%)58 (61.7%)
 FIGO II1 (11.1%)9 (9.6%)
 FIGO III and IV4 (44.4%)27 (28.7%)
Lymph node involvement0.664
 Negative or not evaluated6 (66.7%)69 (73.4%)
 Positive3 (33.3%)25 (26.6%)
Age at first diagnosis (years)0.214
 ≤ 69.042 (22.2%)41 (43.6%)
 > 69.047 (77.8%)56 (56.4%)
ECOG0.324
 Unknown2 (22.2%)26 (28.7%)
 0–15 (55.6%)61 (64.9%)
 2–32 (22.2%)7 (7.4%)
Histological grade0.158
 G13 (33.3%)21 (22.3%)
 G23 (33.3%)60 (63.8%)
 G33 (33.3%)13 (13.8%)
Histological type0.479
 Squamous cell carcinoma8 (88.9%)89 (94.7%)
 Others1 (11.1%)5 (5.3%)

FIGO International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians, ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status

1Chi-square test

Relationship between clinico-pathological parameters and serum albumin in 103 patients with vulvar cancer FIGO International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians, ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status 1Chi-square test Postoperative complications (mainly mild complications) were observed in 55.6% and 39.4% of patients with hypoalbuminemia and normal albumin levels, respectively (p = 0.345). Severe complications (CDC3-5) were rare and observed in 0% and 4.3% of patients with hypoalbuminemia and with normal albumin serum levels, respectively. Any kind of postoperative complication was observed in 42/104 patients. Mean albumin values broken down by Clavien–Dindo-classification are provided in Table 3.
Table 3

Numbers of postoperative complications classified according to Clavien–Dindo-Classification (CDC) broken down by pre-operative serum albumin levels (103 patients)

Perioperative complications (CDC)Albumin ≤ 35 mg/dlAlbumin > 35 mg/dlComplete cohort
None4 (44.4%)57 (60.6%)61 (59.2%)
Grade 12 (22.2%)17 (18.1%)19 (18.4%)
Grade 23 (33.3%)16 (17.0%)19 (18.4%)
Grade 3a0 (0%)1 (1.1%)1 (1.0%)
Grade 3b0 (0%)2 (2.1%)2 (1.9%)
Grade 40 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Grade 50 (0%)1 (1.1%)1 (1.0%)
Total994103
Numbers of postoperative complications classified according to Clavien–Dindo-Classification (CDC) broken down by pre-operative serum albumin levels (103 patients) 27/103 (26.2%) patients received postoperative radiotherapy. Comparing nodal positive patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy to those patients without postoperative radiation we could not find any significant difference in complication rates (10/27 vs. 32/76, p = 0.820). Lymphadenectomy related complication rate such as lymphedema or lymph cysts according to no lymphadenectomy, sentinel lymphadenectomy and systemic lymphadenectomy was 0/20 (0%), 4/45 (8.9%) and 5/37 (13.5%), p = 0.215. Significantly more complications were observed when any kind of lymphadenectomy was performed. Mainly low risk complications were observed. Complication rate according to type of operation was 12/35 (34.3%) in radical local excision, 6/18 (33.3%) in modified radical hemivulvectomy, 4/10 (40%) in modified radical posterior vulvectomy, 8/31 (25.8%) in modified radical anterior vulvectomy and 3/9 (33.3%) in radical vulvectomy, p = 0.311. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification was available in 77 patients. The complication rate among patients with ASA 1 was 7/9 (77.8%), in patients with ASA 2 14/39 (35.9%), in patients with ASA 3 9/22 (40.9%) and 3/7 (42.9%) in patients with ASA 4, p = 0.15. Most frequent types of complications were local wound infection (n = 20), partially requiring antibiotics (CDC 1–2), hemorrhage or hematoma with (n = 8), and lymphedema or lymphocele with (n = 9). One patient died 1 day after surgery due to myocardial infarction and concomitant pulmonary embolism. She was an 80-year-old woman with a FIGO stage II [pT2 N0 M0 R0] disease. Table 4 provides results of multivariable logistic regression analysis including all patients of the study population showing the independent association of age (≤ 69.04 years vs. > 69.04 years), serum albumin levels (> 35 mg/dl vs. ≤ 35 mg/dl), ECOG status (0 vs. > 0) and Lymphadenectomy (no vs. yes) on probability for complications (CDC 1–5).
Table 4

Multivariate regression analysis of prognostic factors for complications (CDC 1–5), N = 102

VariableCDC 1–5
OR95% CIp value
Age (years)
 ≤ 69.041
 > 69.040.750.27–2.040.563
Albumin (mg/dl)
 > 351
 ≤ 350.240.04–1.450.119
ECOG-status
 01
 > 00.650.24–1.730.387
Lymphadenectomy
 No1
 Yes4.221.04–17.050.043

FIGO International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians, ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status

Multivariate regression analysis of prognostic factors for complications (CDC 1–5), N = 102 FIGO International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians, ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status In vulvar cancer patients with hypoalbuminemia compared to patients with normal serum albumin concentrations, 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 17.1% and 58.6%, respectively (p < 0.004). In univariate survival analyses hypoalbuminemia (p < 0.004), advanced FIGO stage (p = 0.003) and patients’ age (p = 0.003) are associated with poor OS. In multivariable analysis, serum albumin (p = 0.013), FIGO stage (p = 0.011) and patients’ age (p = 0.017) are associated with poor OS. Results of the univariate Kaplan–Meier analysis and the multivariable cox regression model are shown in Table 5.
Table 5

Univariate and multivariate overall survival analyses in 103 patients with vulvar cancer

Overall survival
UnivariateaMultivariateb
p value5 year OS ratep valueHR (95% CI)
Serum albumin (≤ 35 mg/dl vs. > 35 mg/dl)0.00417.1% vs. 58.6%0.0230.3 (0.1–0.8)
FIGO stage (I vs. II vs. III–IV)0.00363.8% vs. 64.3% vs. 34.3%0.0091.6 (1.1–2.3)
Patients’ age (< 69.04 vs. ≥ 69.04 years)0.00379.2% vs. 36.6%0.0152.4 (1.2–4.8)
Histological grade (G1 vs. G2 vs. G3)0.57468.2% vs. 54.0% vs. 45.5%0.6421.1 (0.7–2.0)
Type of surgery (local vs. radical)0.46354.3% vs. 56.5%0.4910.8 (0.4–1.5)
Type of Histology (squamous cell vs. others)0.75355.1% vs. 50.0%0.1290.3 (0.1–1.5)

HR hazard ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, OS overall survival

aLog rank test

bMultivariate Cox-regression analysis

Univariate and multivariate overall survival analyses in 103 patients with vulvar cancer HR hazard ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, OS overall survival aLog rank test bMultivariate Cox-regression analysis Patient’s characteristics of the nine patients with hypoalbuminemia are displayed in Table 6.
Table 6

Patients' characteristics in nine vulvar cancer patients with hypoalbuminemia

PAT IDAgeBMIASAFIGONOPLNERTComplication rate
180n.a3IIIPosRadical local excisionSystematic bilateralYesCDC 1
233n.a1IIIPosRadical local excisionSystematic bilateralYesCDC 1
386184INegRadical local excisionSLN unilateralNoCDC 2
47931.44IINegModified radical ant vulvectomySLN unilateralNoCDC 2
57025.42IIIPosRadical local excisionSystematic bilateralYesCDC2
68026.52INegRadical local excisionNoNoNo
779n.a2INegModified radical anterior vulvectomySystematic bilateralNoNo
865n.an.aIIINegRadical local excisionNoYesNo
983n.an.aINegModified radical ant vulvectomySLN bilateralNoNo

BMI body mass index, ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists, N nodal status, LNE lymphadenectomy, RT radiotherapy, n.a. not available, SLN sentinel lymph node

Patients' characteristics in nine vulvar cancer patients with hypoalbuminemia BMI body mass index, ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists, N nodal status, LNE lymphadenectomy, RT radiotherapy, n.a. not available, SLN sentinel lymph node In Fig. 1 Kaplan–Meier survival curves demonstrate the association between pre-treatment serum albumin concentrations and overall OS.
Fig. 1

Kaplan–Meier overall survival curves in patients with vulvar cancer distributed by pre-therapeutic serum albumin levels

Kaplan–Meier overall survival curves in patients with vulvar cancer distributed by pre-therapeutic serum albumin levels

Discussion

Within the present study, we studied a relatively large consecutive series of patients with vulvar cancer and could demonstrate an association between pre-treatment hypoalbuminemia and poor prognosis. This is the first study investigating the prognostic role of pre-treatment hypoalbuminemia in patients with vulvar cancer. In accordance with previously published literature in other solid tumors [15-17], our results suggest a strong association between low pre-treatment serum albumin levels and shorter OS in patients with vulvar cancer independent of other established prognostic parameters. These findings are biologically plausible, as hypoalbuminemia seems to be caused by increased catabolism subsequently leading to cachexia and additionally by advanced tumor stage [12]. Serum albumin is commonly used for assessing patients’ nutritional status. In advanced tumor stages, the levels of serum albumin can drop sharply, because both malnutrition and systematic inflammatory response due to tumors suppress albumin synthesis [23]. Malnutrition and cachexia in cancer patients are significant problems due to a variety of mechanisms involving the tumor, the host response to the tumor, and anticancer therapies [24]. Malnutrition has been associated with worsening of quality of life, reduced treatment response, increased risk of chemotherapy-induced toxicity and a reduction in OS [25]. Therefore, pre-treatment albumin may in future be a helpful tool to recognize a broader high-risk population and supply optimized therapy. The association between hypoalbuminemia and poor prognosis provides an opportunity to explore the role of pre-treatment nutritional interventions as well as increased follow up care. Mild postoperative complications (CDC < 3) are common events in the surgical treatment of vulvar cancer. Despite a trend towards higher rate of complications in the group of patients with hypoalbuminemia, the observed difference in complications was not statistically significant. In a previously published report hypoalbuminemia was shown to be associated with major postoperative wound complications in women undergoing surgery for vulvar cancer [18]. In this study population, hypoalbuminemia was found in 12.8% of patients with vulvar cancer, which is comparable to the rate of hypoalbuminemia found in the current cohort (8.9%). Interestingly, the rate of complication was 10.4% compared to 40.3% in our cohort. A possible explanation for differences in complication rates between the two studies is that different complication classification systems were used. In the current analysis, any kind of complication was assessed and characterized by the Clavien–Dindo classification [21], while Sullivan et al. [18] registered only major wound complications defined as deep surgical site infection. In our cohort, we found major wound complications in 13.7% (n = 14), in 22.2% and 12.9% of patients with hypoalbuminemia and normal albumin levels, respectively (p = 0.438). Still, underreporting of complications is a common problem in retrospective studies, but these mistakes might be distributed equally between groups with normal albumin concentrations and hypoalbuminemia. The association between hypoalbuminemia and increased risk for postoperative complications is supported by a study including 2110 patients with gynecologic malignancies where patients with hypoalbuminemia were six times more likely to suffer from severe complications and were at ten-fold higher risk to die within 30 days after surgery [26]. In addition, these findings are in line with findings in patients with other gynecologic malignancies such as ovarian cancer [27]. In Gaarenstroom et al. [28], 76% of the patients suffered from postoperative complications. In contrast, the complication rate of 40.8% in our cohort is much lower. A possible explanation for this diverging results could be the much larger surgical extent in the above mentioned study where patients received modified radical vulvectomy and complete inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy. In our patient cohort 50% of patients receiving lymphadenectomy only underwent sentinel node dissection, which could be a possible explanation. Hypoalbuminemia often reflects the presence of advanced disease and low performance status caused by tumor cachexia [12]. In our study cohort, presence of hypoalbuminemia was not associated with clinic-pathological parameters such as FIGO stage, patients’ age, and performance status. In contrast, in ovarian cancer hypoalbuminemia was associated with poor performance status and advanced FIGO stage [27]. In endometrial cancer hypoalbuminemia was inversely correlated with FIGO stage, histological grade, and patients' age [15]. These controversial findings might be caused by the small number of patients with hypoalbuminemia within our cohort. Of note, we observed a trend towards more advanced stage, older age and poor performance status in our cohort (Table 2). The strengths of the present study include the single institution uniform approach to care and completeness of clinical data. The main potential limitation of this study—as typical for retrospective studies—is lack of random assignment, patient selection, and incomplete data acquisition. In addition, the number of patients with hypoalbuminemia in our cohort is small, therefore limiting the statistical power of our analyses. Potential strengths of serum albumin as prognostic biomarker are low costs and broad availability [29]. In conclusion, this study suggests that hypoalbuminemia might be a useful prognostic biomarker for overall survival in women with vulvar cancer that is low in cost and broadly available [29]. This and whether serum albumin is associated with perioperative outcomes needs to be further investigated in larger well-controlled trials. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary material 1 (PNG 56 kb)
  29 in total

1.  Association between hypoalbuminemia and surgical site infection in vulvar cancers.

Authors:  Stephanie A Sullivan; Linda Van Le; Abigail L Liberty; John T Soper; Emma L Barber
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  The impact of plasma fibrinogen levels on patients with vulvar cancer.

Authors:  Veronika Seebacher; Stephan Polterauer; Christoph Grimm; Clemens Tempfer; Katrin Hefler-Frischmuth; Alexander Reinthaller; Lukas Hefler
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium.

Authors:  Sergio Pecorelli
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.561

4.  Factors influencing serum albumin in dialysis patients.

Authors:  J Y Yeun; G A Kaysen
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Trends in the incidence of invasive and in situ vulvar carcinoma.

Authors:  Patricia L Judson; Elizabeth B Habermann; Nancy N Baxter; Sara B Durham; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Increased vascular permeability: a major cause of hypoalbuminaemia in disease and injury.

Authors:  A Fleck; G Raines; F Hawker; J Trotter; P I Wallace; I M Ledingham; K C Calman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-06       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  The inflammation-based modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients with vulvar cancer.

Authors:  Katrin Hefler-Frischmuth; Veronika Seebacher; Stephan Polterauer; Clemens Tempfer; Alexander Reinthaller; Lukas Hefler
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.435

8.  Prognostic effect of weight loss prior to chemotherapy in cancer patients. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  W D Dewys; C Begg; P T Lavin; P R Band; J M Bennett; J R Bertino; M H Cohen; H O Douglass; P F Engstrom; E Z Ezdinli; J Horton; G J Johnson; C G Moertel; M M Oken; C Perlia; C Rosenbaum; M N Silverstein; R T Skeel; R W Sponzo; D C Tormey
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen, albumin and age are supplementary to UICC staging systems in predicting survival for colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment.

Authors:  Li-Chu Sun; Koung-Shing Chu; Su-Chen Cheng; Chien-Yu Lu; Chao-Hung Kuo; Jan-Sing Hsieh; Ying-Ling Shih; Shun-Jen Chang; Jaw-Yuan Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  The relationship between hypoalbuminaemia, tumour volume and the systemic inflammatory response in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  R Al-Shaiba; D C McMillan; W J Angerson; E Leen; C S McArdle; P Horgan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-07-19       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

1.  Factors predicting postoperative morbidity after cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Malika Kengsakul; Gatske M Nieuwenhuyzen-de Boer; Suwasin Udomkarnjananun; Stephen J Kerr; Christa D Niehot; Heleen J van Beekhuizen
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.756

Review 2.  The prognostic significance of controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score for surgically treated renal cell cancer and upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lei Peng; Chunyang Meng; Jinze Li; Chengyu You; Yuelin Du; Wei Xiong; Zhongyou Xia; Dehong Cao; Yunxiang Li
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.884

3.  Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications After Vulvar Surgery.

Authors:  Nicolae Bacalbasa; Irina Balescu; Mihaela Vilcu; Simona Dima; Iulian Brezean
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 4.  Hypoalbuminemia as Surrogate and Culprit of Infections.

Authors:  Christian J Wiedermann
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Prognostic value of the albumin-globulin ratio and albumin-globulin score in patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Ying Cai; Yu Zhao; Qiuxin Dai; Maozhong Xu; Xin Xu; Wenkai Xia
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  Association Between the Pretreatment Albumin-to-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Bladder Cancer Treated With Radical Cystectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Shijie Li; Shiyang Lu; Xuefeng Liu; Xiaonan Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Controlling Nutritional Status Score Before Receiving Treatment as a Prognostic Indicator for Patients With Urothelial Cancer: An Exploration Evaluation Methods.

Authors:  Lei Peng; Chunxiao Du; Chunyang Meng; Jinze Li; Chengyu You; Xianhui Li; Pan Zhao; Dehong Cao; Yunxiang Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Defining Models to Classify between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses Using Routine Laboratory Parameters.

Authors:  Elisabeth Reiser; Dietmar Pils; Christoph Grimm; Ines Hoffmann; Stephan Polterauer; Marlene Kranawetter; Stefanie Aust
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.575

9.  Prognostic nutritional index before surgical treatment may serve as a prognostic biomarker for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chunyang Meng; Lijian Gan; Kangsen Li; Fulin Yi; Lei Peng; Jinze Li; Yunxiang Li
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-09-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.