Literature DB >> 15213726

The relationship between hypoalbuminaemia, tumour volume and the systemic inflammatory response in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

R Al-Shaiba1, D C McMillan, W J Angerson, E Leen, C S McArdle, P Horgan.   

Abstract

The relationship between hypoalbuminaemia, tumour volume and C-reactive protein was examined in patients with colorectal liver metastases (n=57). On multiple regression analysis, albumin concentrations were independently associated with C-reactive protein (r=0.56, P<0.001) but not percentage hepatic replacement (P=0.34). These results show that hypoalbuminaemia is associated with the presence of a systemic inflammatory response rather than tumour volume in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15213726      PMCID: PMC2409827          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


It has long been recognised that, in patients with advanced cancer, the presence of hypoalbuminaemia is associated with poor outcome (Franch-Arcas, 2001). In the past, this hypoalbuminaemia has been thought to be the result of nutritional depletion secondary to the tumour. Recently, however, it has been postulated that the reduction in albumin concentration is secondary to the presence of a systemic inflammatory response, as evidenced by elevated circulating concentrations of C-reactive protein (McMillan ). The nature of the relationship between circulating albumin concentration, tumour burden and the systemic inflammatory response has not been established. However, if the presence of a systemic inflammatory response rather than tumour burden were to determine the development of the hypoalbuminaemia associated with advanced cancer, then it might be expected that there would be a stronger relationship between the presence of hypoalbuminaemia and the systemic inflammatory response compared with that between hypoalbuminaemia and tumour volume. The aim of the present study was to examine the relationship between circulating albumin concentration, the tumour burden and the systemic inflammatory response in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients

Patients who had undergone resection of a primary colorectal cancer, who then developed liver metastases and who were referred for assessment for liver resection, were considered eligible for study. As part of their assessment, patients underwent dual phase spiral-computed tomography of the liver. In addition a blood sample was taken for measurement of routine liver enzymes, albumin and C-reactive protein. Only those patients who had no evidence of extrahepatic disease were included in the study. None of the patients had recent chemotherapy. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Glasgow Royal Infirmary.

Biochemical profile

Albumin, C-reactive protein, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase and bilirubin concentrations were assayed using standard methods. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were better than 5 and 10% respectively.

Tumour volume and PHR

Tumour volume and percentage hepatic replacement (PHR) were measured using a similar approach to that previously described (Purkiss and Williams, 1992; Dworkin ). Contrast enhanced CT-scans were performed using a Somatom plus 4 spiral-CT scanner (Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany). The cross-sectional areas of all the metastatic lesions in each 5 mm slice were measured by mapping the perimeter of the region of interest. The total tumour volume was calculated as the sum of the tumour areas in all slices multiplied by the slice thickness. The total liver volume was measured in a similar manner, the PHR calculated as the ratio of tumour to total liver volume multiplied by 100. To assess the reproducibility of the method used, two observers independently measured tumour and liver volumes and PHR in 10 randomly selected patients from the above cohort. The intra-class correlation coefficients were 0.97 or greater for all comparisons. To assess the accuracy of the CT-derived measurements of tumour volume, the CT measurements of tumour volume were compared with the weight of freshly resected tumour in a separate cohort of nine patients undergoing liver resection. The correlation coefficient between the CT-derived measurements of tumour volume and the weight of the resected tumour was greater than 0.99 (P<0.001).

Statistics

The relationships between albumin, PHR and C-reactive protein were analysed using Pearson correlation coefficients and multiple linear regression analysis with albumin as the dependent variable. PHR and C-reactive protein concentration were logarithmically transformed to normalise their distributions. The appropriateness of the regression model was confirmed by examining residuals graphically. Associations involving liver enzymes and bilirubin were analysed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Comparisons between groups of patients were carried out Fisher's exact test or the Mann-Whitney U-test as appropriate. SPSS for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for analysis.

RESULTS

The characteristics of the patients studied are shown in Table 1 . The majority were male, were over the age of 60 years, and had multiple liver metastases, a PHR less than 25%, an albumin concentration in the normal range and an elevated C-reactive protein concentration. Patients with hypoalbuminaemia had significantly higher concentrations of bilirubin (P=0.034) and C-reactive protein (P=0.006).
Table 1

Characteristics and biochemical parameters of patients with colorectal liver metastases in the presence and absence of hypoalbuminaemia

 All patients (n=57)Albumin ⩾35 g l−1 (n=36)Albumin <35 g l−1 (n=21)P-value*
Age (years)66 (46–88)66 (46–83)69 (46–88)0.408
Sex male/female38/1925/1113/80.560
     
Liver metastases    
 Single/multiple14/4311/253/180.169
 Unilobar/bilobar32/2524/128/130.068
 Tumour volume (cm3)126 (3–2006)78 (3–1816)248 (10–2006)0.175
 PHR (%)7 (<1–58)4 (<1–46)15 (<1–58)0.186
     
Biochemistry    
 Albumin (g l−1)37 (18–48)40 (35–48)31 (18–34) 
 Alkaline phosphatase (U l−1)253 (83–1750)255 (115–1750)250 (83–1530)0.810
 Aspartate transaminase (U l−1)29 (13–770)25 (14–72)48 (13–770)0.055
 Alanine transaminase (U l−1)19 (9–380)16 (10–110)31 (9–380)0.090
 Bilirubin (μmol l−1)14 (7–240)13 (7–22)17 (7–240)0.034
 C-reactive protein (mg l−1)38 (<6–247)29 (<6–161)82 (6–247)0.006

Median (range),

comparison of groups with albumin ⩾35 g l−1 and albumin <35 g l−1.

Median (range), comparison of groups with albumin ⩾35 g l−1 and albumin <35 g l−1. There were significant correlations between albumin and PHR (r=−0.34, P=0.010), albumin and C-reactive protein (r=−0.56, P<0.001) and PHR and C-reactive protein (r=0.43, P=0.001). A multiple regression model combining PHR and C-reactive protein as predictor variables (r=−0.57, P<0.001) did not significantly improve on a model based on C-reactive protein alone (Table 2 ). In the combined model, C-reactive protein was a significant independent predictor of albumin concentration adjusted for PHR (P<0.001), while the relationship between albumin and PHR adjusted for C-reactive protein was not significant (P=0.34). The relationship between circulating concentrations of albumin and C-reactive protein is shown in Figure 1.
Table 2

Analysis of variance for regression of albumin on C-reactive protein (CRP) and percentage hepatic replacement by tumour (PHR)

Source of variationDegrees of freedomSum of squaresMean squareFP-value
Total562146.035   
Regression2707.824353.91213.288<0.001
CRP alone1683.266683.26625.691<0.001
PHR adjusted for CRP124.55824.5580.9220.34
PHR alone1245.799245.7997.1140.01
CRP adjusted for PHR1462.025462.02517.347<0.001
Residual541438.21226.634  
Figure 1

The relationship between albumin and C-reactive protein concentrations in patients with colorectal liver metastases (n=57).

The relationship between albumin and C-reactive protein concentrations in patients with colorectal liver metastases (n=57). There were significant rank correlations between PHR and alkaline phosphatase (rs=0.61, P<0.001), aspartate transaminase (rs=0.48, P=0.001), alanine transaminase (rs=0.32, P=0.025) and bilirubin (rs=0.44, P=0.002). Of these liver enzymes and bilirubin, only aspartate transaminase was significantly associated with C-reactive protein (rs=0.29, P=0.045) and albumin (rs=−0.34, P=0.016).

DISCUSSION

It has been recognised for some time that the degree of biochemical upset in patients with advanced cancer depends not only on the tumour burden but also the site of the disease. In advanced colorectal cancer where the tumour is disseminated only to the liver, tumour size is readily assessed by computed tomography and therefore provides a model in which to examine the relationship between hypoalbuminaemia and tumour volume. It is well recognised that albumin concentration is a stage independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (O'Gorman ; Dixon ). In the present study, there was only a weak relationship between albumin concentrations and tumour volume, and therefore the prognostic value of hypoalbuminaemia would not appear to be primarily dependent on tumour burden. In contrast, albumin was strongly associated with the magnitude of the systemic inflammatory response as evidenced by circulating concentrations of C-reactive protein. Furthermore, in a model combining albumin, C-reactive protein and PHR, there was no relationship between albumin and PHR when adjusted for the effect of C-reactive protein. Therefore, the results of the present study are consistent with the concept that the systemic inflammatory response is a major determinant of albumin concentrations in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. It may be that the presence of a chronic systemic inflammatory response, with its increased demand for specific amino acids for acute phase protein synthesis, promotes the degradation of available body protein including albumin (Preston ; McMillan ). Indeed, this relationship between nutritional decline, albumin concentrations and the systemic inflammatory response has recently been exploited to form a new prognostic score in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (Forrest ). The results of the present study also showed that increased activity of the enzymes alkaline phosphatase, aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase reflect increased tumour burden. In particular, raised alkaline phosphatase activity, a recognised prognostic factor, was significantly correlated with tumour volume and therefore its prognostic value would appear to be related to the size of the liver metastases. These increased enzyme activities are consistent with previous work in patients with colorectal liver metastastases (Rougier ) In summary, the results of the present study suggest that, in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, hypoalbuminaemia is secondary to the presence of a systemic inflammatory response rather than nutritional depletion by the tumour.
  9 in total

1.  Albumin concentrations are primarily determined by the body cell mass and the systemic inflammatory response in cancer patients with weight loss.

Authors:  D C McMillan; W S Watson; P O'Gorman; T Preston; H R Scott; C S McArdle
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.900

Review 2.  The meaning of hypoalbuminaemia in clinical practice.

Authors:  G Franch-Arcas
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.324

3.  Prognostic factors in advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients with weight loss.

Authors:  P O'Gorman; D C McMillan; C S McArdle
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.900

4.  Prospective study of prognostic factors in patients with unresected hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Fondation Française de Cancérologie Digestive.

Authors:  P Rougier; C Milan; F Lazorthes; G Fourtanier; C Partensky; H Baumel; J Faivre
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Accurate method to measure the percentage hepatic replacement by tumour and its use in prognosis of patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S F Purkiss; N S Williams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Fibrinogen synthesis is elevated in fasting cancer patients with an acute phase response.

Authors:  T Preston; C Slater; D C McMillan; J S Falconer; A Shenkin; K C Fearon
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Carcinoembryonic antigen and albumin predict survival in patients with advanced colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Matthew R Dixon; Jason S Haukoos; Sejal M Udani; Jesse J Naghi; Tracey D Arnell; Ravin R Kumar; Michael J Stamos
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-09

8.  Measurement of response to treatment in colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  M J Dworkin; D Burke; S Earlam; C Fordy; T G Allen-Mersh
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Evaluation of cumulative prognostic scores based on the systemic inflammatory response in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  L M Forrest; D C McMillan; C S McArdle; W J Angerson; D J Dunlop
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total
  43 in total

1.  Modified glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic factor in gastriccancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xinwu Zhang; Xi Chen; Tao Wu; Yan Zhang; Kun Yan; Xiaoli Sun
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

2.  Inflammation in malignant mesothelioma - friend or foe?

Authors:  Anthony Linton; Nico van Zandwijk; Glen Reid; Stephen Clarke; Christopher Cao; Steven Kao
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-11

3.  Usefulness of Inflammation-Based Prognostic Score in Patients Undergoing Lung Metastasectomy for Colorectal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Satoru Kobayashi; Yoko Karube; Morimichi Nishihira; Takashi Inoue; Osamu Araki; Tetsu Sado; Masayuki Chida
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Systemic inflammatory response associated with distant metastasis of T1 or T2 colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mitsuru Ishizuka; Hitoshi Nagata; Kazutoshi Takagi; Keiichi Kubota
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Usefulness of the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio measured preoperatively as a predictor of peritoneal metastasis in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yusuke Nakayama; Naoto Gotohda; Hidehito Shibasaki; Shogo Nomura; Takahiro Kinoshita; Ryuichi Hayashi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  The relationship between an inflammation-based prognostic score (Glasgow Prognostic Score) and changes in serum biochemical variables in patients with advanced lung and gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  D J F Brown; R Milroy; T Preston; D C McMillan
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Implications of preoperative hypoalbuminemia in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Adam Truong; Mark H Hanna; Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh; Michael J Stamos
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-05-27

8.  Significance of the inflammation-based Glasgow prognostic score for short- and long-term outcomes after curative resection of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Takeshi Kubota; Naoki Hiki; Souya Nunobe; Koshi Kumagai; Susumu Aikou; Ryohei Watanabe; Takeshi Sano; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Prognostic significance of Glasgow prognostic score in patients with stage II colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mao-Song Lin; Jun-Xing Huang; Hong Yu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

10.  Preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen, albumin and age are supplementary to UICC staging systems in predicting survival for colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment.

Authors:  Li-Chu Sun; Koung-Shing Chu; Su-Chen Cheng; Chien-Yu Lu; Chao-Hung Kuo; Jan-Sing Hsieh; Ying-Ling Shih; Shun-Jen Chang; Jaw-Yuan Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.