B Gaonkar1, D Villaroman2, J Beckett2, C Ahn2, M Attiah2, D Babayan2, J P Villablanca3, N Salamon3, A Bui3, L Macyszyn2. 1. From the Departments of Neurosurgery (B.G., D.V., J.B., C.A., M.A., D.B., L.M.) bilwaj@gmail.com. 2. From the Departments of Neurosurgery (B.G., D.V., J.B., C.A., M.A., D.B., L.M.). 3. Radiology (J.P.V., N.S., A.B., L.M.), University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Quantitative imaging biomarkers have not been established for the diagnosis of spinal canal stenosis. This work aimed to lay the groundwork to establish such biomarkers by leveraging the developments in machine learning and medical imaging informatics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Machine learning algorithms were trained to segment lumbar spinal canal areas on axial views and intervertebral discs on sagittal views of lumbar MRIs. These were used to measure spinal canal areas at each lumbar level (L1 through L5). Machine-generated delineations were compared with 2 sets of human-generated delineations to validate the proposed techniques. Then, we use these machine learning methods to delineate and measure lumbar spinal canal areas in a normative cohort and to analyze their variation with respect to age, sex, and height using a variable-intercept mixed model. RESULTS: We established that machine-generated delineations are comparable with human-generated segmentations. Spinal canal areas as measured by machine are statistically significantly correlated with height (P < .05) but not with age or sex. CONCLUSIONS: Our machine learning methodology demonstrates that this important anatomic structure can be accurately detected and quantitatively measured without human input in a manner comparable with that of human raters. Anatomic deviations measured against the normative model established here could be used to flag spinal stenosis in the future.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Quantitative imaging biomarkers have not been established for the diagnosis of spinal canal stenosis. This work aimed to lay the groundwork to establish such biomarkers by leveraging the developments in machine learning and medical imaging informatics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Machine learning algorithms were trained to segment lumbar spinal canal areas on axial views and intervertebral discs on sagittal views of lumbar MRIs. These were used to measure spinal canal areas at each lumbar level (L1 through L5). Machine-generated delineations were compared with 2 sets of human-generated delineations to validate the proposed techniques. Then, we use these machine learning methods to delineate and measure lumbar spinal canal areas in a normative cohort and to analyze their variation with respect to age, sex, and height using a variable-intercept mixed model. RESULTS: We established that machine-generated delineations are comparable with human-generated segmentations. Spinal canal areas as measured by machine are statistically significantly correlated with height (P < .05) but not with age or sex. CONCLUSIONS: Our machine learning methodology demonstrates that this important anatomic structure can be accurately detected and quantitatively measured without human input in a manner comparable with that of human raters. Anatomic deviations measured against the normative model established here could be used to flag spinal stenosis in the future.
Authors: B Gaonkar; D Villaroman; J Beckett; C Ahn; M Attiah; D Babayan; J P Villablanca; N Salamon; A Bui; L Macyszyn Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 4.966
Authors: Mark E Stephens; Christen M O'Neal; Alison M Westrup; Fauziyya Y Muhammad; Daniel M McKenzie; Andrew H Fagg; Zachary A Smith Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2021-09-07 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Ahmed Benzakour; Pavlos Altsitzioglou; Jean Michel Lemée; Alaaeldin Ahmad; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Thami Benzakour Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2022-07-29 Impact factor: 3.479
Authors: B Gaonkar; D Villaroman; J Beckett; C Ahn; M Attiah; D Babayan; J P Villablanca; N Salamon; A Bui; L Macyszyn Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 4.966