| Literature DB >> 31466521 |
Shelby E Gantt1, Steven E McMurray1, Amber D Stubler2, Christopher M Finelli1, Joseph R Pawlik1, Patrick M Erwin3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sponges are important suspension-feeding members of reef communities, with the collective capacity to overturn the entire water column on shallow Caribbean reefs every day. The sponge-loop hypothesis suggests that sponges take up dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and, via assimilation and shedding of cells, return carbon to the reef ecosystem as particulate organic carbon (POC). Sponges host complex microbial communities within their tissues that may play a role in carbon and nutrient cycling within the sponge holobiont. To investigate this relationship, we paired microbial community characterization (16S rRNA analysis, Illumina Mi-Seq platform) with carbon (DOC, POC) and nutrient (PO4, NOx, NH4) flux data (specific filtration rate) for 10 common Caribbean sponge species at two distant sites (Florida Keys vs. Belize, ~ 1203 km apart).Entities:
Keywords: Ammonium (NH4); Benthic-pelagic coupling; DOC; HMA-LMA; Holobiont; Microbiomes; POC; Sponge-loop
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31466521 PMCID: PMC6716902 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-019-0739-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiome ISSN: 2049-2618 Impact factor: 14.650
Alpha diversity measurements of microbial communities in 10 sponge species and ambient seawater showing sponge abundance category (HMA vs. LMA) and replicates per location (Conch Reef, Florida, vs. Carrie Bow Cay, Belize). Values are means ± 1 standard error
| Sponge Species | Conch Reef, Florida | Carrie Bow Cay, Belize | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category |
| S | H′ | D |
| S | H′ | D | |
|
| HMA | 6 | 559 ± 22 | 4.20 ± 0.14 | 0.035 ± 0.008 | 6 | 466 ± 48 | 3.90 ± 0.14 | 0.045 ± 0.009 |
|
| HMA | 1 | 288 | 3.17 | 0.14 | 0 | – | – | – |
|
| HMA | 3 | 505 ± 24 | 4.53 ± 0.06 | 0.020 ± 0.003 | 0 | – | – | – |
|
| HMA | 6 | 534 ± 21 | 4.55 ± 0.06 | 0.025 ± 0.002 | 2 | 563 ± 68 | 4.47 ± 0.04 | 0.027 ± 0.002 |
|
| HMA | 2 | 533 ± 15 | 4.73 ± 0.05 | 0.015 ± 0.001 | 4 | 445 ± 36 | 4.25 ± 0.07 | 0.028 ± 0.003 |
|
| HMA | 5 | 543 ± 10 | 4.66 ± 0.02 | 0.019 ± 0.001 | 5 | 545 ± 12 | 4.53 ± 0.03 | 0.021 ± 0.001 |
|
| LMA | 7 | 716 ± 13* | 4.12 ± 0.03 | 0.042 ± 0.002 | 5 | 690 ± 10* | 4.04 ± 0.01 | 0.042 ± 0.005 |
|
| LMA | 5 | 537 ± 33 | 2.45 ± 0.21 | 0.323 ± 0.051 | 5 | 474 ± 36 | 2.08 ± 0.30 | 0.420 ± 0.087 |
|
| LMA | 6 | 433 ± 37 | 2.27 ± 0.23* | 0.250 ± 0.040* | 5 | 324 ± 20 | 1.59 ± 0.18* | 0.409 ± 0.059* |
|
| LMA | 7 | 503 ± 25 | 2.33 ± 0.20 | 0.344 ± 0.053 | 4 | 353 ± 36 | 1.83 ± 0.22 | 0.419 ± 0.061 |
| Seawater | – | 5 | 661 ± 30 | 4.04 ± 0.05 | 0.046 ± 0.001 | 6 | 732 ± 18 | 4.21 ± 0.04 | 0.037 ± 0.001 |
| Total | 53 | 42 | |||||||
Asterisks (*) indicate significant within species differences across locations based on Tukey’s HSD tests. S OTU richness, H′ Shannon-Weaver, and D Simpson diversity index
Fig. 1Cluster dendrogram based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrices for all sampled sponge microbial communities collected from both sites. The two main branches separate into HMA (left) and LMA (right) species plus seawater, dividing into respective species (except V. gigantea and V. reiswigi). All species exhibited some degree of clustering by location (Florida or Belize)
Fig. 2Phylum-level composition of microbial communities of all sampled sponges across sites (Florida and Belize) by host species. The species A. archeri is based on the raw count of a single sample, and the species I. strobilina is averaged for two samples from the Florida site only (since none were sampled in Belize). Sequences associated with Proteobacteria are further divided into class levels
DistLM results correlating POC and DOC specific filtration rates (μmol/s/L sponge) and microbial community structure in sponges from Florida and Belize, showing analysis for all species, by category (HMA/LMA), and for all pairwise species comparisons
| Dataset |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| POC | DOC | POC | DOC | |
| All species | 0.001* | 0.154 | 0.084 | 0.022 |
| All LMA species | 0.002* | 0.895 | 0.096 | 0.015 |
| All HMA species | 0.403 | 0.965 | 0.033 | 0.013 |
| Pairwise LMA comparisons | ||||
| | 0.003* | 0.746 | 0.180 | 0.046 |
| | 0.001* | 0.965 | 0.276 | 0.020 |
| | 0.002* | 0.057 | 0.105 | 0.101 |
| | 0.289 | 0.907 | 0.066 | 0.033 |
| | 0.477 | 0.958 | 0.062 | 0.038 |
| | 0.167 | 0.899 | 0.063 | 0.027 |
| Pairwise HMA comparisons | ||||
| | 0.229 | 0.884 | 0.089 | 0.030 |
| | 0.133 | 0.777 | 0.116 | 0.041 |
| | 0.562 | 0.301 | 0.041 | 0.069 |
| | 0.340 | 0.865 | 0.099 | 0.052 |
| | 0.084 | 0.609 | 0.126 | 0.065 |
| | 0.191 | 0.695 | 0.093 | 0.058 |
| Pairwise LMA-HMA comparisons | ||||
| | 0.001* | 0.586 | 0.295 | 0.029 |
| | 0.081 | 0.457 | 0.138 | 0.046 |
| | 0.007* | 0.795 | 0.286 | 0.027 |
| | 0.005* | 0.799 | 0.334 | 0.019 |
| | 0.001* | 0.355 | 0.156 | 0.055 |
| | 0.016* | 0.729 | 0.172 | 0.044 |
| | 0.605 | 0.060 | 0.049 | 0.134 |
| | 0.001* | 0.812 | 0.144 | 0.028 |
| | 0.020* | 0.338 | 0.181 | 0.074 |
| | 0.348 | 0.352 | 0.088 | 0.094 |
| | 0.082 | 0.599 | 0.215 | 0.072 |
| | 0.035* | 0.452 | 0.228 | 0.06 |
| | 0.172 | 0.034 | 0.077 | 0.150 |
| | 0.938 | 0.116 | 0.023 | 0.118 |
| | 0.190 | 0.135 | 0.098 | 0.127 |
| | 0.131 | 0.226 | 0.092 | 0.081 |
Asterisks (*) indicate significant P-values
DistLM results correlating nutrient flux (NH4, NOx, and PO4 specific filtration rates, μmol/s/L sponge) and microbial community structure in sponges from Belize, showing analysis for all species, by category (HMA/LMA) and for all pairwise species comparisons
| Dataset |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NH4 | NOx | PO4 | NH4 | NOx | PO4 | |
| All species | 0.002* | 0.790 | 0.153 | 0.155 | 0.020 | 0.043 |
| All LMA species | 0.073 | 0.897 | 0.178 | 0.100 | 0.035 | 0.084 |
| All HMA species | 0.549 | 0.609 | 0.933 | 0.080 | 0.074 | 0.037 |
| Pairwise LMA comparisons | ||||||
| | 0.022* | 0.718 | 0.657 | 0.274 | 0.104 | 0.111 |
| | 0.032* | 0.515 | 0.095 | 0.457 | 0.124 | 0.315 |
| | 0.040* | 0.843 | 0.696 | 0.287 | 0.074 | 0.081 |
| | 0.163 | 0.981 | 0.024* | 0.189 | 0.041 | 0.201 |
| | 0.038* | 0.535 | 0.103 | 0.261 | 0.108 | 0.145 |
| | 0.055 | 0.278 | 0.077 | 0.238 | 0.123 | 0.223 |
| Pairwise HMA comparisons | ||||||
| | 0.036* | 0.026* | 0.043* | 0.585 | 0.582 | 0.575 |
| | 0.782 | 0.656 | 0.239 | 0.092 | 0.150 | 0.282 |
| | 0.871 | 0.440 | 0.895 | 0.050 | 0.099 | 0.042 |
| | 0.147 | 0.360 | 0.655 | 0.590 | 0.582 | 0.475 |
| | 0.010* | 0.125 | 0.581 | 0.386 | 0.399 | 0.158 |
| | 0.959 | 0.226 | 0.779 | 0.091 | 0.185 | 0.103 |
| Pairwise LMA-HMA comparisons | ||||||
| | 0.014* | 0.480 | 0.046* | 0.573 | 0.125 | 0.387 |
| | 0.123 | 0.577 | 0.639 | 0.479 | 0.117 | 0.117 |
| | 0.040* | 0.471 | 0.217 | 0.522 | 0.122 | 0.278 |
| | 0.005* | 0.404 | 0.066 | 0.624 | 0.116 | 0.378 |
| | 0.052 | 0.150 | 0.397 | 0.451 | 0.283 | 0.123 |
| | 0.227 | 0.126 | 0.199 | 0.675 | 0.677 | 0.674 |
| | 0.218 | 0.117 | 0.201 | 0.675 | 0.677 | 0.674 |
| | 0.416 | 0.115 | 0.941 | 0.155 | 0.314 | 0.021 |
| | 0.046* | 0.895 | 0.500 | 0.352 | 0.098 | 0.123 |
| | 0.002* | 0.936 | 0.507 | 0.289 | 0.106 | 0.125 |
| | 0.149 | 0.849 | 0.562 | 0.299 | 0.095 | 0.116 |
| | 0.001* | 0.777 | 0.229 | 0.389 | 0.087 | 0.130 |
| | 0.028* | 0.259 | 0.644 | 0.360 | 0.151 | 0.069 |
| | 0.108 | 0.077 | 0.359 | 0.347 | 0.572 | 0.230 |
| | 0.127 | 0.656 | 0.675 | 0.302 | 0.087 | 0.084 |
| | 0.004* | 0.112 | 0.785 | 0.407 | 0.234 | 0.041 |
Asterisks (*) indicate significant P-values
Fig. 3Distance-based redundancy analysis (dbRDA) plot of all sponge samples classified by microbial abundance type (HMA, LMA) and correlated to the carbon/nutrient flux variables, namely DOC and POC specific filtration rates (top) and NH4, NOx, and PO4 specific filtration rates (bottom)
Taxonomy of OTUs that exhibited relative abundances significantly correlated with NH4 or POC specific filtration rates (Pearson) and differed significantly within sponge species across locations (Metastats)
| Species | OTU | Phylum | Lowest taxonomy | Correlation source | Pearson correlation | Correlation | Metastats | Ave. relative Abd | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florida | Belize | ||||||||
|
| 090 |
| G | NH4 | 0.9974 | 0.0026 | 0.0506 | 2.3 | 1.1 |
|
| 011 |
| C. | NH4 | 0.9379 | 0.0184 | 0.0275 | 1.3 | 0.5 |
| 028 |
| G. | NH4 | 0.8830 | 0.0472 | 0.0320 | 0.5 | 0.2 | |
| 045 |
| C. | NH4 | 0.9041 | 0.0351 | 0.0114 | 0.6 | 0.1 | |
|
| 060 |
| G. | POC | 0.7149 | 0.0463 | 0.0226 | 1.24 | 0.51 |
|
| 070 |
| C. | POC | − 0.8370 | 0.0377 | 0.0044 | 1.78 | 0.45 |
|
| 035 |
| O. | POC | 0.6880 | 0.0279 | 0.0179 | 2.25 | 1.61 |
| 067 |
| P. | POC | − 0.6387 | 0.0469 | 0.0600 | 0.96 | 1.13 | |
| 081 |
| C. | POC | − 0.6472 | 0.0431 | 0.0033 | 1.54 | 2.89 | |
| 129 |
| F. | POC | 0.8114 | 0.0044 | 0.0524 | 0.45 | 0.30 | |
| 134 |
| C. | POC | 0.6884 | 0.0277 | 0.0137 | 0.04 | 0.39 | |
P phylum, C class, O order, F family, G genus
PCR-based screening of nitrogen cycling genes in 10 sponge species from 2 locations, showing the number of samples testing positive (left value) and the total number of samples tested (right value) for 4 functional genes. Amplifications for amoB and nifH genes were repeated in triplicate for each sample
| Category | Species | Location | Function gene PCR assays | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| HMA |
| Florida | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
|
| Florida | 6/6 | 5/5 | 0/1 | 0/1 | |
| Belize | 4/5 | 3/4 | 0/1 | 0/1 | ||
|
| Florida | 0/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 | |
|
| Florida | 4/6 | 0/2 | 0/1 | 0/1 | |
| Belize | 2/2 | 0/2 | 0/1 | 0/1 | ||
|
| Florida | 1/2 | 0/2 | 0/1 | 0/1 | |
| Belize | 2/4 | 1/4 | 0/1 | 0/1 | ||
|
| Florida | 5/5 | 0/5 | 0/1 | 0/1 | |
| Belize | 4/5 | 0/5 | 0/1 | 0/1 | ||
| LMA |
| Florida | 0/3 | 0/2 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| Belize | 0/3 | 0/2 | 0/1 | 0/1 | ||
|
| Florida | 0/3 | 0/2 | 0/1 | 0/1 | |
| Belize | 0/3 | 0/2 | 0/1 | 0/1 | ||
|
| Florida | 0/3 | 0/2 | 0/1 | 0/1 | |
| Belize | 0/3 | 0/2 | 0/1 | 0/1 | ||
|
| Florida | 0/3 | 0/2 | 0/1 | 0/1 | |
| Belize | 0/3 | 0/2 | 0/1 | 0/1 | ||