| Literature DB >> 31464656 |
William B Sherwood1, Victoria Bion1, Gabrielle A Lockett1, Ali H Ziyab2, Nelís Soto-Ramírez3, Nandini Mukherjee4, Ramesh J Kurukulaaratchy5,6, Susan Ewart7, Hongmei Zhang4, S Hasan Arshad5,6, Wilfried Karmaus4, John W Holloway1,5, Faisal I Rezwan8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding is protective against many long-term diseases, yet the mechanisms involved are unknown. Leptin gene (LEP) is reported to be associated with body mass index (BMI). On the other hand, breastfeeding duration has been found to be associated with DNA methylation (DNAm) of the LEP gene. Therefore, epigenetic regulation of LEP may represent the mechanism underlying the protective effect of breastfeeding duration against obesity.Entities:
Keywords: BMI trajectories; Breastfeeding; DNA methylation; Epigenetics; Exclusive breastfeeding; Leptin; Obesity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31464656 PMCID: PMC6716837 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-019-0727-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Epigenetics ISSN: 1868-7075 Impact factor: 6.551
Characteristics of Isle of Wight Birth Cohort participants at 10 and 18 years.
| Characteristic | IOWBC Participants at 10 years ( | IOWBC Participants at 18 years ( |
|---|---|---|
| Child sex (female) | 190 (64.0%) | 209 (68.5%) |
| Maternal socioeconomic status | ||
| 1 (lowest) | 41 (13.8%) | 49 (16.1%) |
| 2 | 60 (20.2%) | 52 (17.0%) |
| 3 | 89 (29.9%) | 88 (28.9%) |
| 4 | 82 (27.6%) | 85 (27.9%) |
| 5 (highest) | 25 (8.4%) | 31 (10.2%) |
| No maternal smoking during pregnancy | 238 (80.1%) | 250 (82.0%) |
| Gestational age < 38 weeks | 12 (4.0%) | 15 (4.9%) |
| Overweight (BMI > 19.8 at 10 years, > 25 at 18) | 62 (20.9%) | 83 (27.2%) |
| Never breastfed | 38 (12.8%) | 48 (15.7%) |
| BMI trajectory | ||
| Normal (reference) | 211 (71%) | 215 (70.5%) |
| Delayed overweight (trajectory 2) | 41 (13.8%) | 48 (15.8%) |
| Early transient overweight (trajectory 3) | 33 (11.1%) | 30 (9.8%) |
| Early persistent obesity (trajectory 4) | 12 (4.1%) | 12 (3.9%) |
Descriptive statistics on exposure and covariates of participants included in the study. This is given as the number of participants in each category and as a percentage for each characteristic. Note that for the overweight category, different BMI cut-offs are used at 10 or 18 years, as defined by the International Obesity Taskforce
Fig. 1A mediation model for the association between breastfeeding duration (total and exclusive) and childhood obesity. βM represents the effect estimate for breastfeeding duration on DNA methylation (CpG ~ breastfeeding duration + covariates); βY represents the effect estimate for CpG on childhood obesity (BMI trajectory ~ CpG + covariates; βc represents the direct effect (no mediation) estimate for breastfeeding duration on childhood obesity (BMI trajectory ~ breastfeeding duration + covariates; βc′ represents the total effect estimate on childhood obesity (BMI trajectory = breastfeeding duration + covariates + CpG)
Association between total breastfeeding duration and LEP DNAm at 10 years
| Probe name | Estimate | SE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| cg03084214 | 5.23E−04 | 2.33E−04 | 0.026 |
| cg11005360 | − 2.39E−04 | 1.07E−04 | 0.027 |
| cg23381058 | − 4.91E−04 | 1.96E−04 | 0.013 |
| cg23753947 | 1.73E−04 | 8.20E−05 | 0.036 |
Columns: Probe name = LEP CpG sites from Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC Beadchip significantly associated with total breastfeeding duration; Estimate = coefficient denoting the increase or decrease in methylation by one unit (in week) of increase of total breastfeeding duration; SE = standard error of coefficient; P value < 0.05 was considered significant. Only the four CpG sites considered significant are included, see Additional file 1: Table S5, for all 23 CpG sites tested
Association between exclusive breastfeeding duration and LEP DNAm at 10 years
| Probe name | Estimate | SE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| cg05091920 | 4.23E−04 | 2.12E−04 | 0.048 |
| cg15792829 | 5.87E−04 | 2.37E−04 | 0.015 |
| cg18603538 | 8.07E−04 | 3.69E−04 | 0.030 |
| cg23381058 | − 8.17E−04 | 4.00E−04 | 0.043 |
Columns: Probe name = LEP CpG sites from Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC Beadchip significantly associated with exclusive breastfeeding duration; Estimate = coefficient denoting the increase or decrease in methylation by one unit (in week) of increase of exclusive breastfeeding duration; SE = standard error of coefficient; P value < 0.05 was considered significant. Only the four CpG sites considered significant are included, see Additional file 1: Table S6, for all 23 CpG sites tested.
Statistically significant differentially methylated regions (DMRs) (Sidak P value < 0.05) for total breastfeeding duration
| Age | Location | No. of probes | Slk | Sidak | Ref gene name and genomic feature | CpG feature | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | chr10:104535854-104535920 | 2 | 4.62E−07 | 0.005 | WBP1L | TSS200; body; 5′UTR;1stExon | NA |
| 10 | chr19:54567060-54567128 | 3 | 3.74E−07 | 0.004 | VSTM1 | 5′UTR;1stExon; body | NA |
| 18 | chr22:37678728-37678791 | 2 | 2.49E−07 | 0.002 | CYTH4 | Body | NA |
Both Slk = uncorrected Stouffer-Liptak-Kechris P values, and Sidak P values corrected for multiple testing are reported. Here, 5′UTR = 5 prime untranslated region; TSS200 = 0–200 bases upstream from the transcription start sites; TSS1500 = 200–1500 bases upstream from the transcriptional start site; body = gene body
Statistically significant differentially methylated regions (DMRs) (Sidak P value < 0.05) for exclusive breastfeeding duration
| Age | Location | No. of probes | Slk | Sidak | Ref gene name and genomic feature | CpG feature | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | chr1:173837002-173837197 | 7 | 4.13E−12 | 9.62E−09 | GAS5 | Body; TSS150;TSS200 | Island, shore |
| 18 | chr2:24397787-24397845 | 3 | 1.43E−07 | 0.001 | FAM228A | TSS200 | Island |
Both Slk = uncorrected Stouffer-Liptak-Kechris P values, and Sidak P values corrected for multiple testing are reported. Here, 5′UTR = 5 prime untranslated region; TSS200 = 0–200 bases upstream from the transcription start sites; TSS1500 = 200–1500 bases upstream from the transcriptional start site; body = gene body
Association between duration of total and exclusive breastfeeding and BMI trajectory
| Total breastfeeding | Exclusive breastfeeding | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI trajectory | Estimate | SE | Estimate | SE | |||
| 2 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.29 | 0.002 | 0.014 | 0.88 | |
| 3 | − 0.02 | 0.008 | 0.002* | − 0.03 | 0.015 | 0.05 | |
| 4 | 0.012 | 0.014 | 0.40 | − 0.02 | 0.030 | 0.43 | |
BMI trajectory defined by Ziyab et al. [42]. Columns: trajectory 2 = early persistent obesity, trajectory 3 = early transient overweight, trajectory 4 = delayed overweight; estimate = coefficient denoting one-unit (in week) increase in breastfeeding duration is associated with the increase in the log odds of being in BMI trajectory; standard error = standard error of coefficient. P value < 0.05 was considered significant and is indicated by *. Each trajectory was tested against the control group (BMI trajectory 1)
Mediation analysis between cg23381058, total breastfeeding duration and BMI Trajectory 3 (Early transient overweight)
| Total breastfeeding | Exclusive breastfeeding | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Probe name | Estimate | SE | Probe name | Estimate | SE | ||
| cg03084214 | 6.585 | 7.330 | 0.349 | cg05091920 | − 15.843 | 10.651 | 0.125 |
| cg11005360 | 2.986 | 15.504 | 0.366 | cg15792829 | − 17.064 | 9.602 | 0.155 |
| cg23381058 | 3.183 | 4.277 | 0.034* | cg18603538 | − 1.101 | 6.033 | 0.292 |
| cg23753947 | -23.567 | 17.710 | 0.946 | cg23381058 | 4.805 | 3.187 | 0.034* |
Mediation analysis between cg23381058, total breastfeeding duration, and BMI trajectory 3 (early transient overweight)
| Total breastfeeding duration | Exclusive breastfeeding duration | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 95% CI Lower | 95% CI Upper | Beta | 95% CI Lower | 95% CI Upper | |||
| ACME | 5.81E−05 | − 2.46E−04 | 4.31E−04 | 0.73 | 2.48E−04 | − 3.1E−04 | 1.19E−03 | 0.42 |
| ADE | − 2.43E−03 | − 4.94E−03 | 1.16E−04 | 0.06 | − 2.25E−03 | − 7.27E−03 | 2.76E−03 | 0.36 |
| Total effect | − 2.37E−03 | − 4.91E−03 | 1.42E−04 | 0.07 | − 2.00E-03 | − 7.07E−03 | 3.06E−03 | 0.42 |
| Prop. mediated | − 2.45E−02 | − 4.19E−01 | 2.72E−01 | 0.76 | − 0.12 | − 1.66 | 1.54 | 0.72 |
Columns: Effects— ACME average causal mediation effects, ADE average direct effects, Total effect, sum of a mediation (indirect) effect and a direct effect, Prop. mediated proportion of the total effect explained by the mediator