Literature DB >> 34314675

Spatial modulation of dark versus bright stimulus responses in the mouse visual system.

Brice Williams1, Joseph Del Rosario1, Tomaso Muzzu2, Kayla Peelman1, Stefano Coletta1, Edyta K Bichler1, Anderson Speed1, Lisa Meyer-Baese1, Aman B Saleem2, Bilal Haider3.   

Abstract

A fundamental task of the visual system is to respond to both increases and decreases of luminance with action potentials (ON and OFF responses1-4). OFF responses are stronger, faster, and more salient than ON responses in primary visual cortex (V1) of both cats5,6 and primates,7,8 but in ferrets9 and mice,10 ON responses can be stronger, weaker,11 or balanced12 in comparison to OFF responses. These discrepancies could arise from differences in species, experimental techniques, or stimulus properties, particularly retinotopic location in the visual field, as has been speculated;9 however, the role of retinotopy for ON/OFF dominance has not been systematically tested across multiple scales of neural activity within species. Here, we measured OFF versus ON responses across large portions of visual space with silicon probe and whole-cell patch-clamp recordings in mouse V1 and lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN). We found that OFF responses dominated in the central visual field, whereas ON and OFF responses were more balanced in the periphery. These findings were consistent across local field potential (LFP), spikes, and subthreshold membrane potential in V1, and were aligned with spatial biases in ON and OFF responses in LGN. Our findings reveal that retinotopy may provide a common organizing principle for spatial modulation of OFF versus ON processing in mammalian visual systems.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LFP; luminance; membrane potential; retinotopy; single units; visual cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34314675      PMCID: PMC8478832          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.06.094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.900


  50 in total

Review 1.  Cell types, circuits, and receptive fields in the mouse visual cortex.

Authors:  Cristopher M Niell
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Visual space is represented by nonmatching topographies of distinct mouse retinal ganglion cell types.

Authors:  Adam Bleckert; Gregory W Schwartz; Maxwell H Turner; Fred Rieke; Rachel O L Wong
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Darks are processed faster than lights.

Authors:  Stanley Jose Komban; Jose-Manuel Alonso; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Modular Representation of Luminance Polarity in the Superficial Layers of Primary Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Gordon B Smith; David E Whitney; David Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Working for food shifts nocturnal mouse activity into the day.

Authors:  Roelof A Hut; Violetta Pilorz; Ate S Boerema; Arjen M Strijkstra; Serge Daan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Cortical State Fluctuations across Layers of V1 during Visual Spatial Perception.

Authors:  Anderson Speed; Joseph Del Rosario; Christopher P Burgess; Bilal Haider
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  Dynamics of gaze control during prey capture in freely moving mice.

Authors:  Angie M Michaiel; Elliott Tt Abe; Cristopher M Niell
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Inhibition dominates sensory responses in the awake cortex.

Authors:  Bilal Haider; Michael Häusser; Matteo Carandini
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Parallel processing of visual space by neighboring neurons in mouse visual cortex.

Authors:  Spencer L Smith; Michael Häusser
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Two Distinct Types of Eye-Head Coupling in Freely Moving Mice.

Authors:  Arne F Meyer; John O'Keefe; Jasper Poort
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Probing mechanisms of visual spatial attention in mice.

Authors:  Anderson Speed; Bilal Haider
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 16.978

2.  Rat sensitivity to multipoint statistics is predicted by efficient coding of natural scenes.

Authors:  Riccardo Caramellino; Eugenio Piasini; Andrea Buccellato; Anna Carboncino; Vijay Balasubramanian; Davide Zoccolan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  ON/OFF domains shape receptive field structure in mouse visual cortex.

Authors:  Elaine Tring; Konnie K Duan; Dario L Ringach
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  Cortical mechanisms of visual brightness.

Authors:  Reece Mazade; Jianzhong Jin; Hamed Rahimi-Nasrabadi; Sohrab Najafian; Carmen Pons; Jose-Manuel Alonso
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 9.995

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.