OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the molar inclination and skeletal and alveolar bone changes when comparing tooth bone-borne (MSE) and tissue bone-borne type maxillary expanders (C-expander) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in late adolescence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of 48 late-adolescent patients were divided into two groups according to the type of expander: MSE group (n = 24, age = 19.2 ± 5.9 years) and C-expander group (n = 24, age = 18.1 ± 4.5 years). CBCT scans were taken before treatment and 3 months after expansion. Transverse skeletal and dental expansion, alveolar inclination, tooth axis, buccal alveolar bone height, thickness, dehiscence, and fenestration were evaluated on the maxillary first molar. Paired t-test, independent t-test, Pearson's chi-square test, and Spearman correlation analysis were performed. RESULTS: The MSE group produced greater dental expansion (P < .05), whereas skeletal expansion was similar in both groups (P = .859). The C expander group had more alveolar bone inclination change (P < .01), and the MSE group had more buccal tipping of the anchorage teeth (P < .01 or .001). Buccal alveolar bone height loss and thickness changes were greater in the MSE group (P < .01 or <.001). Formation of dehiscences was more frequent in the MSE group (P < .001), whereas for fenestrations, there were no significant differences between the two groups. Buccal bone height loss in the MSE group had a negative correlation with initial buccal bone thickness. CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of teeth into bone-borne expanders resulted in an increase in the severity of side effects. For patients in late adolescence, tissue bone-borne expanders offer comparable skeletal effects to tooth bone-borne expanders, with fewer dentoalveolar side effects.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the molar inclination and skeletal and alveolar bone changes when comparing tooth bone-borne (MSE) and tissue bone-borne type maxillary expanders (C-expander) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in late adolescence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of 48 late-adolescent patients were divided into two groups according to the type of expander: MSE group (n = 24, age = 19.2 ± 5.9 years) and C-expander group (n = 24, age = 18.1 ± 4.5 years). CBCT scans were taken before treatment and 3 months after expansion. Transverse skeletal and dental expansion, alveolar inclination, tooth axis, buccal alveolar bone height, thickness, dehiscence, and fenestration were evaluated on the maxillary first molar. Paired t-test, independent t-test, Pearson's chi-square test, and Spearman correlation analysis were performed. RESULTS: The MSE group produced greater dental expansion (P < .05), whereas skeletal expansion was similar in both groups (P = .859). The C expander group had more alveolar bone inclination change (P < .01), and the MSE group had more buccal tipping of the anchorage teeth (P < .01 or .001). Buccal alveolar bone height loss and thickness changes were greater in the MSE group (P < .01 or <.001). Formation of dehiscences was more frequent in the MSE group (P < .001), whereas for fenestrations, there were no significant differences between the two groups. Buccal bone height loss in the MSE group had a negative correlation with initial buccal bone thickness. CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of teeth into bone-borne expanders resulted in an increase in the severity of side effects. For patients in late adolescence, tissue bone-borne expanders offer comparable skeletal effects to tooth bone-borne expanders, with fewer dentoalveolar side effects.
Authors: Chuck Carlson; Jay Sung; Ryan W McComb; Andre Wilson Machado; Won Moon Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Kitichai Rungcharassaeng; Joseph M Caruso; Joseph Y K Kan; Jay Kim; Guy Taylor Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Craig McMullen; Najla N Al Turkestani; Antonio C O Ruellas; Camila Massaro; Marcus V N N Rego; Marilia S Yatabe; Hera Kim-Berman; James A McNamara; Fernanda Angelieri; Lorenzo Franchi; Peter Ngan; Hong He; Lucia H S Cevidanes Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2021-12-31 Impact factor: 2.711