Literature DB >> 33386930

Radiological evaluation of the bone and soft tissue thicknesses of the palate for using a miniscrew-supported maxillary skeletal expander.

Sun-Kyoung Yu1, Yonghwa Cho1, Yo-Seob Seo2, Jae-Sung Kim3, Do Kyung Kim3, Heung-Joong Kim4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the palatal bone and soft tissue thicknesses using a miniscrew-supported maxillary skeletal expander (MSE) in Class III malocclusion.
METHODS: The thicknesses of the palatal bone and soft tissue were measured in cone-beam computed tomography images obtained from 58 patients. All 20 points were crossing points between five levels, which were defined at 3 mm intervals relative to the line connecting the central fossae of the first molar (Level 0), and 2 mm and 4 mm lateral to the anteroposterior reference line (AP line).
RESULTS: The palatal bone was significantly thicker in males than females in the anterior palate up to Level 0, while there was no significant sex-related difference in the posterior palate. There was a tendency for the thickness to decrease in the posterior direction, except in females at 2 mm lateral to the AP line. The palatal soft tissue was significantly thicker in males than females in all positions. At 2 mm lateral to the AP line, the palatal soft tissue thickness decreased in the posterior direction. A 4 mm lateral to the AP line, it initially decreased in the posterior direction, and then increasing again at Level - 6 (6 mm posterior of Level 0). As the lateral distance from the AP line increased, the palatal bone thickness decreased while the palatal soft tissue thickness increased.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide quantitative data on the palatal bone and soft tissue thicknesses for the miniscrew-supported MSE in the posterior palate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Maxillary skeletal expander; Orthodontic miniscrew; Palatal bone thickness; Palatal soft tissue thickness

Year:  2021        PMID: 33386930     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-020-02634-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  24 in total

1.  Bicortical vs monocortical orthodontic skeletal anchorage.

Authors:  Bryan T Brettin; Nicole M Grosland; Fang Qian; Karin A Southard; Tony D Stuntz; Teresa A Morgan; Steve D Marshall; Thomas E Southard
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Influence of interdigitation and expander type in the mechanical response of the midpalatal suture during maxillary expansion.

Authors:  J A Guerrero-Vargas; T A Silva; S Macari; E B de Las Casas; D A Garzón-Alvarado
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Evaluation of miniscrew-supported rapid maxillary expansion in adolescents: A prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Tugce Celenk-Koca; Aslihan Ertan Erdinc; Serpil Hazar; Lacey Harris; Jeryl D English; Sercan Akyalcin
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Midfacial changes in the coronal plane induced by microimplant-supported skeletal expander, studied with cone-beam computed tomography images.

Authors:  Daniele Cantarella; Ramon Dominguez-Mompell; Christoph Moschik; Sanjay M Mallya; Hsin Chuan Pan; Mohammed R Alkahtani; Islam Elkenawy; Won Moon
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion appliance to orthopedically correct transverse maxillary deficiency in an adult.

Authors:  Chuck Carlson; Jay Sung; Ryan W McComb; Andre Wilson Machado; Won Moon
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Quantitative investigation of palatal bone depth and cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement in adults.

Authors:  Sebastian Baumgaertel
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Quantitative cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of palatal bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew placement.

Authors:  Antonio Gracco; Luca Lombardo; Mauro Cozzani; Giuseppe Siciliani
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Three-dimensional quantitative assessment of palatal bone height for insertion of orthodontic implants - a retrospective CBCT study.

Authors:  Sachin Chhatwani; Viola Rose-Zierau; Bassel Haddad; Mohammed Almuzian; Christian Kirschneck; Gholamreza Danesh
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.151

9.  Three-dimensional soft tissue analysis of the face following micro-implant-supported maxillary skeletal expansion.

Authors:  Sara Abedini; Islam Elkenawy; Eric Kim; Won Moon
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 2.750

10.  Zygomaticomaxillary modifications in the horizontal plane induced by micro-implant-supported skeletal expander, analyzed with CBCT images.

Authors:  Daniele Cantarella; Ramon Dominguez-Mompell; Christoph Moschik; Luca Sfogliano; Islam Elkenawy; Hsin Chuan Pan; Sanjay M Mallya; Won Moon
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.