Literature DB >> 31456857

Treatment Response Assessment of Skeletal Metastases in Prostate Cancer with 18F-NaF PET/CT.

Erik M Velez1, Bhushan Desai1, Hossein Jadvar1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the utility of 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-NaF PET/CT) in the imaging assessment of therapy response in men with osseous-only metastatic prostate cancer.
METHODS: In this Institutional Review Board-approved single institution retrospective investigation, we evaluated 21 18F-NaF PET/CT scans performed in 14 patients with osseous metastatic disease from prostate cancer and no evidence of locally recurrent or soft-tissue metastatic disease who received chemohormonal therapy. Imaging-based qualitative and semi-quantitative parameters were defined and compared with changes in serum PSA level.
RESULTS: Qualitative and semi-quantitative image-based assessments demonstrated > 80% concordance with good correlation (SUVmax κ = 0.71, SUVavg κ = 0.62, SUVsum κ = 0.62). Moderate correlation (κ = 0.43) was found between SUVmax and PSA-based treatment response assessments. There was no statistically significant correlation between PSA-based disease progression and semi-quantitative parameters. Qualitative imaging assessment was moderately correlated (κ = 0.52) with PSA in distinguishing responders and non-responders.
CONCLUSION: 18F-NaF PET/CT is complementary to biochemical monitoring in patients with bone-only metastases from prostate cancer which can be helpful in subsequent treatment management decisions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-NaF; Bone; Cancer; Metastasis; PET/CT; Prostate

Year:  2019        PMID: 31456857      PMCID: PMC6694323          DOI: 10.1007/s13139-019-00601-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1869-3474


  34 in total

1.  SNM practice guideline for sodium 18F-fluoride PET/CT bone scans 1.0.

Authors:  George Segall; Dominique Delbeke; Michael G Stabin; Einat Even-Sapir; Joanna Fair; Rebecca Sajdak; Gary T Smith
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Molecular mechanisms of bone 18F-NaF deposition.

Authors:  Johannes Czernin; Nagichettiar Satyamurthy; Christiaan Schiepers
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Flare response in 18F-fluoride ion PET bone scanning.

Authors:  Andrew A Wade; James A Scott; Irene Kuter; Alan J Fischman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Michael S Cookson; Gunnar Aus; Arthur L Burnett; Edith D Canby-Hagino; Anthony V D'Amico; Roger R Dmochowski; David T Eton; Jeffrey D Forman; S Larry Goldenberg; Javier Hernandez; Celestia S Higano; Stephen R Kraus; Judd W Moul; Catherine Tangen; J Brantley Thrasher; Ian Thompson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference.

Authors:  Mack Roach; Gerald Hanks; Howard Thames; Paul Schellhammer; William U Shipley; Gerald H Sokol; Howard Sandler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 6.  Imaging of malignant bone involvement by morphologic, scintigraphic, and hybrid modalities.

Authors:  Einat Even-Sapir
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  FDG PET for evaluating the change of glucose metabolism in prostate cancer after androgen ablation.

Authors:  N Oyama; H Akino; Y Suzuki; H Kanamaru; H Ishida; K Tanase; N Sadato; Y Yonekura; K Okada
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.690

8.  The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: 99mTc-MDP Planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, 18F-fluoride PET, and 18F-fluoride PET/CT.

Authors:  Einat Even-Sapir; Ur Metser; Eyal Mishani; Gennady Lievshitz; Hedva Lerman; Ilan Leibovitch
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 9.  An introduction to Na(18)F bone scintigraphy: basic principles, advanced imaging concepts, and case examples.

Authors:  Robert L Bridges; Chris R Wiley; John C Christian; Adam P Strohm
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2007-05-11

Review 10.  Assessment of therapeutic response in patients with metastatic bone disease.

Authors:  Andrew Clamp; Sarah Danson; Huy Nguyen; David Cole; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  4 in total

1.  Clinical value of dual-phase F-18 sodium fluoride PET/CT for diagnosing bone metastasis in cancer patients with solitary bone lesion.

Authors:  Jeong Won Lee; Yong-Jin Park; Youn Soo Jeon; Ki Hong Kim; Jong Eun Lee; Sung Hoon Hong; Sang Mi Lee; Su Jin Jang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-11

Review 2.  Recent updates and developments in PET imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Steven P Rowe; Geoffrey B Johnson; Martin G Pomper; Michael A Gorin; Spencer C Behr
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-12

3.  Plasma Circulating Tumor Epstein-Barr Virus for the Surveillance of Cancer Progression in Bone-Only Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Guo-Ying Liu; Wei-Xiong Xia; Zhuo-Fei Bi; Nian Lu; Wang-Zhong Li; Wei-Xin Bei; Hu Liang; Jun-Zhi Xie; Yi-Min Liu; He-Rui Yao; Yan-Qun Xiang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Comparative prognostic implication of treatment response assessments in mCRPC: PERCIST 1.0, RECIST 1.1, and PSA response criteria.

Authors:  Erik M Velez; Bhushan Desai; Lingyun Ji; David I Quinn; Patrick M Colletti; Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 11.556

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.