Literature DB >> 29502651

Determining Adherence to Follow-up Imaging Recommendations.

Thusitha Mabotuwana1, Vadiraj Hombal2, Sandeep Dalal2, Christopher S Hall3, Martin Gunn4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Radiology reports often contain follow-up imaging recommendations. However, these recommendations are not always followed up by referring physicians and patients. Failure to comply in a timely manner can lead to delayed treatment, poor patient outcomes, unnecessary testing, lost revenue, and legal liability. Therefore, the primary objective of this research was to determine adherence rates to follow-up recommendations.
METHODS: We extracted radiology examination-related data, including report text, for examinations performed between January 1, 2010, and February 28, 2017, from the radiology information system at an academic institution. The data set contained 2,972,164 examinations. The first 6 years were used as the period during which a follow-up recommendation was to be detected, allowing for a maximum of 14 months for a follow-up examination to be performed.
RESULTS: At least one recommendation for follow-up imaging was present in 10.6% of radiology reports. Overall, the follow-up imaging adherence rate was 58.14%. Mammography had the highest follow-up adherence rate at 69.03%, followed by MRI at 67.54%. Of the modalities, nuclear medicine had the lowest adherence rate at 37.93%.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that follow-up imaging adherence rates are inherently low and vary by modality and that appropriate interventions may be needed to improve compliance to follow-up imaging recommendations.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical informatics applications; follow-up imaging; follow-up imaging adherence; radiology reports

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29502651     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.11.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  8 in total

1.  Determining Follow-Up Imaging Study Using Radiology Reports.

Authors:  Sandeep Dalal; Vadiraj Hombal; Wei-Hung Weng; Gabe Mankovich; Thusitha Mabotuwana; Christopher S Hall; Joseph Fuller; Bruce E Lehnert; Martin L Gunn
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Viewing Imaging Studies: How Patient Location and Imaging Site Affect Referring Physicians.

Authors:  Fatemeh Homayounieh; Ramandeep Singh; Tianqi Chen; Ellen J Sugarman; Thomas J Schultz; Subba R Digumarthy; Keith J Dreyer; Mannudeep K Kalra
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Effect of intravenous contrast for CT abdomen and pelvis on detection of urgent and non-urgent pathology: can repeat CT within 72 hours be avoided?

Authors:  Christine Lamoureux; Scott Weber; Tarek Hanna; Andrew J Grabiel; Reese H Clark
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2019-07-22

4.  A Web Application for Adrenal Incidentaloma Identification, Tracking, and Management Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Wasif Bala; Jackson Steinkamp; Timothy Feeney; Avneesh Gupta; Abhinav Sharma; Jake Kantrowitz; Nicholas Cordella; James Moses; Frederick Thurston Drake
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  Recommendations in Second Opinion Reports of Neurologic Head and Neck Imaging: Frequency, Referring Clinicians' Compliance, and Diagnostic Yield.

Authors:  S A Heinz; D Yakar; R A J O Dierckx; M J Lamers; T C Kwee
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.966

6.  Recommendations for additional imaging of abdominal imaging examinations: frequency, benefit, and cost.

Authors:  Sabine A Heinz; Thomas C Kwee; Derya Yakar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  A systematic review of natural language processing applied to radiology reports.

Authors:  Arlene Casey; Emma Davidson; Michael Poon; Hang Dong; Daniel Duma; Andreas Grivas; Claire Grover; Víctor Suárez-Paniagua; Richard Tobin; William Whiteley; Honghan Wu; Beatrice Alex
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Analysis of Radiology Report Recommendation Characteristics and Rate of Recommended Action Performance.

Authors:  Tiantian White; Mark D Aronson; Scot B Sternberg; Umber Shafiq; Seth J Berkowitz; James Benneyan; Russell S Phillips; Gordon D Schiff
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-07-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.