| Literature DB >> 31450818 |
Ben Jesuorsemwen Enagbonma1, Bukola Rhoda Aremu1, Olubukola Oluranti Babalola2.
Abstract
Profiling the metabolic processes performed by bacteria is vital both for understanding and for manipulating ecosystems for industrial or research purposes. In this study we aim to assess the bacterial functional diversity in termite mound soils with the assumption that significant differences will be observed in the functional diversity of bacteria between the termite mound soils and their surrounding soils and that each environment has a distinguishing metabolic profile. Here, metagenomic DNA extracted from termite mound soils and their corresponding surrounding soils, which are 10 m apart, were sequenced using a shotgun sequencing approach. Our results revealed that the relative abundances of 16 functional categories differed significantly between both habitats. The α diversity analysis indicated no significant difference in bacterial functional categories within the habitats while the β diversity showed that the bacterial functional categories varied significantly between the termite mound soils and the surrounding soil samples. The variations in soil physical and chemical properties existing between the two environments were held accountable for the differences in bacterial functional structure. With the high relative abundance of functional categories with unknown function reported in this study, this could signify the likelihood of getting novel genes from termite mound soils, which are needed for research and commercial applications.Entities:
Keywords: illumina sequencing; metabolic potentials; metagenomics; novel genes; termitarium
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31450818 PMCID: PMC6770954 DOI: 10.3390/genes10090637
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Figure 1Termite mounds colonized by Coptotermes species.
Figure 2Sequences similar to major metabolisms in termite mound soils and the surrounding soil samples. The scale bar represents color saturation gradient based on the relative abundances with z-score transformed relative abundance of the functional gene categories. Abbreviations are as indicated in the text above.
Figure 3PCA of Functional analysis of bacterial metagenomes. The length of the vectors represents the strength of influence of the particular metabolic process. Axis 1 and axis 2 explained 86.1% and 11.47% variation, respectively.
Figure 4Functional categories based on SEED Subsystem level 2 classification in each soil sample.
Diversity and evenness estimation of the functional categories of soil samples at SEED Subsystem level 1.
| T1 | T2 | S1 | S2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shannon_H | 2.86 ± 0.16 | 2.87 ± 0.16 | 2.85 ± 0.16 | 2.84 ± 0.16 | 0.99 |
| Evenness_e^H/S | 0.62 ± 0.06 | 0.63 ± 0.06 | 0.62 ± 0.07 | 0.61 ± 0.07 |
Mean ± standard deviation (n = 4). p-values based on Kruskal–Wallis test.
Figure 5Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) for functional categories at Subsystem level 1 obtained from termite mound soils and surrounding soil samples.
Soil analysis of termite mound soils and their comparative surrounding soils.
| Soil Property | T1 | T2 | S1 | S2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sand (%) | 65.00 ± 8.29a | 47.75 ± 23.60b | 72.00 ± 17.66c | 76.50 ± 3.00d |
| Silt (%) | 9.00 ± 2.94a | 19.75 ± 11.38a | 11.75 ± 12.87a | 10.25 ± 0.96a |
| Clay (%) | 26.00 ± 6.27a | 33.25 ± 13.52a | 16.25 ± 4.50b | 13.25 ± 3.20c |
| K (mg/L) | 393.50 ± 120.33a | 427.50 ± 57.93a | 216.75 ± 48.40b | 184.50 ± 27.72c |
| Ca (mg/L) | 1879.50 ± 587.38a | 2237.75 ± 318.91a | 1493.50 ± 456.59a | 1108.50 ± 160.48b |
| Mg (mg/L) | 575.00 ± 262.32a | 622.25 ± 60.84a | 349.75 ± 159.70a | 330.25 ± 138.75a |
| pH | 5.10 ± 0.33a | 4.48 ± 0.46a | 5.80 ± 0.32b | 5.38 ± 0.39c |
| N (%) | 0.09 ± 0.03a | 0.10 ± 0.03b | 0.59 ± 0.47c | 0.25 ± 0.04d |
| P (mg/L) | 0.25 ± 0.50a | 0.75 ± 0.50a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a |
| OC (%) | 0.31 ± 0.42a | 0.10 ± 0.00a | 0.11 ± 0.0a | 0.11 ± 0.01a |
Mean ± standard deviation (n = 4). Mean values in a same row with different letters (a, b, c, and d) were significantly different (p-value < 0.05) based on Tukey’s pairwise significant difference test.
Figure 6Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of functional categories and major soil chemical parameters for both samples.
Forward selection of environmental variables, which best explain variation in functional gene composition (Subsystem level 1 genes) between samples.
| Environmental Variable | Explains % | Contribution % | Pseudo-F |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | 92.8 | 92.8 | 25.8 | 0.09 |
| Ca | 5.1 | 5.1 | 2.4 | 0.87 |
| Sand | 2.1 | 2.1 | <0.1 | 1. |