Literature DB >> 31448675

Mild replication stress causes aneuploidy by deregulating microtubule dynamics in mitosis.

Nicolas Böhly1, Magdalena Kistner1, Holger Bastians1.   

Abstract

Chromosomal instability (CIN) causes structural and numerical chromosome aberrations and represents a hallmark of cancer. Replication stress (RS) has emerged as a driver for structural chromosome aberrations while mitotic defects can cause whole chromosome missegregation and aneuploidy. Recently, first evidence indicated that RS can also influence chromosome segregation in cancer cells exhibiting CIN, but the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Here, we show that chromosomally unstable cancer cells suffer from very mild RS, which allows efficient proliferation and which can be mimicked by treatment with very low concentrations of aphidicolin. Both, endogenous RS and aphidicolin-induced very mild RS cause chromosome missegregation during mitosis leading to the induction of aneuploidy. Moreover, RS triggers an increase in microtubule plus end growth rates in mitosis, an abnormality previously identified to cause chromosome missegregation in cancer cells. In fact, RS-induced chromosome missegregation is mediated by increased mitotic microtubule growth rates and is suppressed after restoration of proper microtubule growth rates and upon rescue of replication stress. Hence, very mild and cancer-relevant RS triggers aneuploidy by deregulating microtubule dynamics in mitosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromosomal instability; chromosome segregation; mitosis; replication stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31448675      PMCID: PMC6773245          DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2019.1658477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


  38 in total

1.  Visualization of microtubule growth in cultured neurons via the use of EB3-GFP (end-binding protein 3-green fluorescent protein).

Authors:  Tatiana Stepanova; Jenny Slemmer; Casper C Hoogenraad; Gideon Lansbergen; Bjorn Dortland; Chris I De Zeeuw; Frank Grosveld; Gert van Cappellen; Anna Akhmanova; Niels Galjart
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  The checkpoint response to replication stress.

Authors:  Dana Branzei; Marco Foiani
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-05-23

Review 3.  Introduction to molecular combing: genomics, DNA replication, and cancer.

Authors:  John Herrick; Aaron Bensimon
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

Review 4.  The origins and processing of ultra fine anaphase DNA bridges.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Christian F Nielsen; Qi Yao; Ian D Hickson
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 5.578

5.  53BP1 nuclear bodies form around DNA lesions generated by mitotic transmission of chromosomes under replication stress.

Authors:  Claudia Lukas; Velibor Savic; Simon Bekker-Jensen; Carsten Doil; Beate Neumann; Ronni Sølvhøj Pedersen; Merete Grøfte; Kok Lung Chan; Ian David Hickson; Jiri Bartek; Jiri Lukas
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-02-13       Impact factor: 28.824

6.  Loss of the tumour-suppressor genes CHK2 and BRCA1 results in chromosomal instability.

Authors:  Ailine Stolz; Norman Ertych; Holger Bastians
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.407

7.  BLM is required for faithful chromosome segregation and its localization defines a class of ultrafine anaphase bridges.

Authors:  Kok-Lung Chan; Phillip S North; Ian D Hickson
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  A mechanism linking extra centrosomes to chromosomal instability.

Authors:  Neil J Ganem; Susana A Godinho; David Pellman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-06-07       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Genome stability is ensured by temporal control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics.

Authors:  Samuel F Bakhoum; Sarah L Thompson; Amity L Manning; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 10.  The causes and consequences of genetic heterogeneity in cancer evolution.

Authors:  Rebecca A Burrell; Nicholas McGranahan; Jiri Bartek; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  12 in total

1.  DDX41 coordinates RNA splicing and transcriptional elongation to prevent DNA replication stress in hematopoietic cells.

Authors:  Satoru Shinriki; Mayumi Hirayama; Akiko Nagamachi; Akihiko Yokoyama; Takeshi Kawamura; Akinori Kanai; Hidehiko Kawai; Junichi Iwakiri; Rin Liu; Manabu Maeshiro; Saruul Tungalag; Masayoshi Tasaki; Mitsuharu Ueda; Kazuhito Tomizawa; Naoyuki Kataoka; Takashi Ideue; Yutaka Suzuki; Kiyoshi Asai; Tokio Tani; Toshiya Inaba; Hirotaka Matsui
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 12.883

Review 2.  Effects of aneuploidy on cell behaviour and function.

Authors:  Rong Li; Jin Zhu
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 113.915

3.  N-Acetyltransferase 10 Promotes Micronuclei Formation to Activate the Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype Machinery in Colorectal Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Yanan Cao; Mengfei Yao; Yaqian Wu; Ningning Ma; Haijing Liu; Bo Zhang
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 4.  DNA Replication Stress and Chromosomal Instability: Dangerous Liaisons.

Authors:  Therese Wilhelm; Maha Said; Valeria Naim
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  Tetraploidy-Associated Genetic Heterogeneity Confers Chemo-Radiotherapy Resistance to Colorectal Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Claudia Galofré; Öykü Gönül Geyik; Elena Asensio; Darawalee Wangsa; Daniela Hirsch; Carolina Parra; Jordi Saez; Meritxell Mollà; Zeynep Yüce; Antoni Castells; Thomas Ried; Jordi Camps
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  The p53/p73 - p21CIP1 tumor suppressor axis guards against chromosomal instability by restraining CDK1 in human cancer cells.

Authors:  Ann-Kathrin Schmidt; Karoline Pudelko; Jan-Eric Boekenkamp; Katharina Berger; Maik Kschischo; Holger Bastians
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Acute systemic loss of Mad2 leads to intestinal atrophy in adult mice.

Authors:  Klaske M Schukken; Yinan Zhu; Petra L Bakker; Mirjam H Koster; Liesbeth Harkema; Sameh A Youssef; Alain de Bruin; Floris Foijer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Thermal hysteresis in microtubule assembly/disassembly dynamics: The aging-induced degradation of tubulin dimers.

Authors:  R Wu; J R Guzman-Sepulveda; A P Kalra; J A Tuszynski; A Dogariu
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2022-01-08

9.  KDM6A mutations promote acute cytoplasmic DNA release, DNA damage response and mitosis defects.

Authors:  J Koch; A Lang; P Whongsiri; W A Schulz; M J Hoffmann; A Greife
Journal:  BMC Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2021-10-26

Review 10.  The Dynamic Instability of the Aneuploid Genome.

Authors:  Lorenza Garribba; Stefano Santaguida
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-02-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.