Literature DB >> 31447946

Does proximal porous coating in short-stem humeral arthroplasty reduce stress shielding?

Martin T Tan1, John W Read2, Desmond J Bokor3.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Short-stem humeral designs in shoulder arthroplasty have been introduced recently. A retrospective cohort study was conducted to determine if newer proximal porous titanium coating in humeral short stems produced clinical and radiologic improvements.
METHOD: Short-stem humeral implants (Tornier Ascend, Wright Medical) were used in 46 anatomical total shoulder replacements from October 2012 to December 2015. Clinical and radiologic measures were analyzed at one- and two-year follow-up.
RESULTS: Nineteen shoulders received earlier grit blasted stems (Ascend Monolithic), and 27 shoulders received the later stems with proximal titanium porous coating (Ascend Flex). At two-year follow-up, radiographic changes and stress shielding were similar. Medial cortical thinning were more frequently observed in Monolithic (18 of 19) compared to Flex stems (19 of 27) on the PA films, though this was not statistically significant (P = 0.061). Clinical outcome scores improved regardless of the stem type used and independent of the radiologic adaptations on plain films. One participant with the Ascend Flex developed glenoid component failure and rotator cuff tear and was subsequently revised. DISCUSSION: Clinical and radiological outcomes are similar in both short-stem designs. Proximal titanium porous coating may reduce medial calcar cortical thinning but it does not prevent it. KEY MESSAGE: When compared to similarly designed uncoated grit-blasted stems, proximally porous coated humeral short stems produced similar clinical and radiological results. The proximal titanium porous coating may reduce medial cortical thinning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthritis; mini-stem; press-fit; replacement; shoulder; uncemented

Year:  2018        PMID: 31447946      PMCID: PMC6688152          DOI: 10.1177/1758573218773533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  27 in total

1.  The radiographic evaluation of keeled and pegged glenoid component insertion.

Authors:  Mark D Lazarus; Kirk L Jensen; Carleton Southworth; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kamal I Bohsali; Michael A Wirth; Charles A Rockwood
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Total shoulder arthroplasty utilizing mini-stem humeral components: technique and short-term results.

Authors:  Patrick W Jost; Joshua S Dines; Matthew H Griffith; Michael Angel; David W Altchek; David M Dines
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-09-27

4.  Shoulder arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis: 303 consecutive cases with minimum 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Jonathan D Barlow; Brandon J Yuan; Cathy D Schleck; W Scott Harmsen; Robert H Cofield; John W Sperling
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Factors predicting complication rates after primary shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eugene Farng; David Zingmond; Lucie Krenek; Nelson F Soohoo
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Second-generation cementless total hip arthroplasty. Eight to eleven-year results.

Authors:  M J Archibeck; R A Berger; J J Jacobs; L R Quigley; S Gitelis; A G Rosenberg; J O Galante
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Periprosthetic fractures associated with primary total shoulder arthroplasty and primary humeral head replacement: a thirty-three-year study.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; John Sperling; Cathy Schleck; William Harmsen; Robert Cofield
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Intramedullary reaming for press-fit fixation of a humeral component removes cortical bone asymmetrically.

Authors:  Michael Lee; Caroline Chebli; Doug Mounce; Alexander Bertelsen; Michael Richardson; Frederick Matsen
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 9.  Radiographic analysis of shoulder anatomical arthroplasty.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Francesco Di Pietto; Stefania Romano; Paolo Paladini; Fabrizio Campi; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  Short-stem uncemented primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty: clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  S A Giuseffi; P Streubel; J Sperling; J Sanchez-Sotelo
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.082

View more
  1 in total

1.  Humeral stem with low filling ratio reduces stress shielding in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Su Cheol Kim; Jong Hun Park; Hashem Bukhary; Jae Chul Yoo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.479

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.