Literature DB >> 35353240

Humeral stem with low filling ratio reduces stress shielding in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Su Cheol Kim1, Jong Hun Park1, Hashem Bukhary1, Jae Chul Yoo2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Some patients show severe humeral bone stress shielding even one year after press-fit humeral stem, which can be a risk factor for implant durability. This study compared humeral stress shielding and clinical outcomes between high and low filling ratio (HFR and LFR) stems in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA).
METHODS: From 2015 to 2020, 104 patients who underwent RSA with a non-cemented standard-length humeral stem were examined. The humeral stems included large press-fit stems (HFR group, 53 patients) or small non-press-fit stems with autogenous cancellous bone grafting (LFR group, 51 patients). The radiologic and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups one year post-operatively.
RESULTS: One patient in the LFR group with early infectious dislocation was excluded from the 1-one year evaluation. No stress shielding was observed in 27/50 (54.0%) and 5/53 (9.4%) of patients in the LFR and HFR groups, while 3/50 (6%) and 19/53 (35.8%) patients showed high-stress shielding, respectively. However, the stem alignment change, subsidence, complications and evidence of loosening did not differ between the groups. The final range-of-motion and functional scores were significantly poorer in the LFR group than those in the HFR group, although the difference was minimal.
CONCLUSION: Even at one year follow-up, patients receiving LFR stems with autogenous bone grafting had significantly less humeral stress shielding compared to patients with HFR stem with press-fit in primary RSA, without compromising stem stability.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Filling ratio; Humeral stem; Osteolysis; Resorption; Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; Stress shielding

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35353240     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05383-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.479


  30 in total

1.  Clinical and radiological results of a cementless short stem shoulder prosthesis at minimum follow-up of two years.

Authors:  Marc Schnetzke; Sebastian Coda; Gilles Walch; Markus Loew
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Radiographic changes and clinical outcomes associated with an adjustable diaphyseal press-fit humeral stem in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Samuel M Harmsen; Tom R Norris
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Long-term survival and failure analysis of anatomical stemmed and stemless shoulder arthroplasties.

Authors:  Nicole Märtens; Maximilian Heinze; Friedemann Awiszus; Jessica Bertrand; Christoph H Lohmann; Alexander Berth
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Long-term clinical consequences of stress-shielding after total hip arthroplasty without cement.

Authors:  W D Bugbee; W J Culpepper; C A Engh; C A Engh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Medial calcar bone resorption after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: does it affect outcomes?

Authors:  Paul DeVito; Hyrum Judd; Andy Malarkey; Leah Elson; Emmanuel McNeely; Derek Berglund; Rushabh Vakharia; Jonathan C Levy
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Stress shielding and bone resorption in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jochem Nagels; Mariëlle Stokdijk; Piet M Rozing
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 7.  Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hans Lindahl
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Radiologic bone adaptations on a cementless short-stem shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  Marc Schnetzke; Sebastian Coda; Patric Raiss; Gilles Walch; Markus Loew
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a concise review.

Authors:  Su Cheol Kim; Il Su Kim; Min Chang Jang; Jae Chul Yoo
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2021-03-02

Review 10.  Short Humeral Stems in Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hwang Kyun Oh; Tae Kang Lim
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2018-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.