Literature DB >> 20018287

The effect of positioning on the biomechanical performance of soft shell hip protectors.

W J Choi1, J A Hoffer, S N Robinovitch.   

Abstract

Wearable hip protectors represent a promising strategy for reducing risk for hip fracture from a sideways fall. However, small changes in pad positioning may influence their protective benefit. Using a mechanical hip impact simulator, we investigated how three marketed soft shell hip protectors attenuate and redistribute the impact force applied to the hip, and how this depends on displacement from their intended position by 2.5 or 5 cm superiorly, posteriorly, inferiorly or anteriorly. For centrally-placed protectors, peak pressure was reduced 93% below the unpadded value by a 16 mm horseshoe-shaped protector, 93% by a 14 mm horseshoe protector, and 94% by a 16 mm continuous protector. In unpadded trials, 83% of the total force was applied to the skin overlying the proximal femur (danger zone). This was lowered to 19% by the centrally placed 16 mm horseshoe protector, to 34% by the 14 mm horseshoe, and to 40% by the 16 mm continuous protector. Corresponding reductions in peak force delivered to the femoral neck (relative to unpadded) were 45%, 38%, and 20%, respectively. The protective benefit of all three protectors decreased with pad displacement. For example, displacement of protectors by 5 cm anteriorly caused peak femoral neck force to increase 60% above centrally-placed values, and approach unpadded values. These results indicate that soft shell hip protectors provide substantial protective benefits, but decline in performance with small displacements from their intended position. Our findings confirm the need for correct and stable positioning of hip protectors in garment design. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20018287     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.11.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  7 in total

1.  Effects of hip abductor muscle forces and knee boundary conditions on femoral neck stresses during simulated falls.

Authors:  W J Choi; P A Cripton; S N Robinovitch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The effects of pad geometry and material properties on the biomechanical effectiveness of 26 commercially available hip protectors.

Authors:  Andrew C Laing; Fabio Feldman; Mona Jalili; Chun Ming Jimmy Tsai; Stephen N Robinovitch
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 3.  Test systems for the biomechanical evaluation of hip protectors: a systematic review.

Authors:  S A Yahaya; Z M Ripin; M I Z Ridzwan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Biomechanical testing of hip protectors following the Canadian Standards Association express document.

Authors:  B E Keenan; S L Evans
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Validation and psychometric properties of the commitment to hip protectors (C-HiP) index in long-term care providers of British Columbia, Canada: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Alexandra M B Korall; Judith Godin; Fabio Feldman; Ian D Cameron; Pet-Ming Leung; Joanie Sims-Gould; Stephen N Robinovitch
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 6.  The Role of Fall Biomechanics in the Cause and Prevention of Bone Fractures in Older Adults.

Authors:  Vicki Komisar; Stephen Neil Robinovitch
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Development of a stick-on hip protector: A multiple methods study to improve hip protector design for older adults in the acute care environment.

Authors:  E Post; V Komisar; J Sims-Gould; Amb Korall; F Feldman; S N Robinovitch
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2019-12-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.