Joshua R Vest1, Ofir Ben-Assuli2. 1. Indiana University, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN, United States; Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, United States. Electronic address: joshvest@iu.edu. 2. Ono Academic College, Faculty of Business Administration, Kiryat Ono, Israel. Electronic address: ofir@ono.ac.il.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Interoperable health information technologies, like electronic health records (EHR) and health information exchange (HIE), provide greater access to patient information from across multiple organizations. Also, an increasing number of public data sources exist to describe social determinant of health factors. These data may help better inform risk prediction models, but the relative importance or value of these data has not been established. This study assessed the performance of different classes of information individually, and in combination, in predicting emergency department (ED) revisits. METHODS: In a sample of 279,611 adult ED encounters. We compared the performance of Two-Class Boosted Decision Trees machine learning algorithm using 5 classes of information: 1) social determinants of health measures only, 2) current visit EHR information only, 3) current and historical EHR information, 4) HIE information only, and 5) all available information combined. RESULTS: The social determinants of health measure only model had the overall worst performance with an area under the curve AUC of 0.61. The model using all information classes together had the best performance (AUC = 0.732). The model using HIE information only performed better than all other single information class models. CONCLUSIONS: Broad information sources, which are reflective of patients' reliance on multiple organizations for care, better support risk prediction modeling in the emergency department.
INTRODUCTION: Interoperable health information technologies, like electronic health records (EHR) and health information exchange (HIE), provide greater access to patient information from across multiple organizations. Also, an increasing number of public data sources exist to describe social determinant of health factors. These data may help better inform risk prediction models, but the relative importance or value of these data has not been established. This study assessed the performance of different classes of information individually, and in combination, in predicting emergency department (ED) revisits. METHODS: In a sample of 279,611 adult ED encounters. We compared the performance of Two-Class Boosted Decision Trees machine learning algorithm using 5 classes of information: 1) social determinants of health measures only, 2) current visit EHR information only, 3) current and historical EHR information, 4) HIE information only, and 5) all available information combined. RESULTS: The social determinants of health measure only model had the overall worst performance with an area under the curve AUC of 0.61. The model using all information classes together had the best performance (AUC = 0.732). The model using HIE information only performed better than all other single information class models. CONCLUSIONS: Broad information sources, which are reflective of patients' reliance on multiple organizations for care, better support risk prediction modeling in the emergency department.
Authors: Xiaomei Wang; H Joseph Blumenthal; Daniel Hoffman; Natalie Benda; Tracy Kim; Shawna Perry; Ella S Franklin; Emilie M Roth; A Zachary Hettinger; Ann M Bisantz Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2021-04-09 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Melissa L McCarthy; Zhaonian Zheng; Marcee E Wilder; Angelo Elmi; Yixuan Li; Scott L Zeger Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 6.762
Authors: Ruhee Shah; Alessandra Della Porta; Sherman Leung; Margaret Samuels-Kalow; Elizabeth M Schoenfeld; Lynne D Richardson; Michelle P Lin Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2021-10-27
Authors: Jennifer Holcomb; Luis C Oliveira; Linda Highfield; Kevin O Hwang; Luca Giancardo; Elmer Victor Bernstam Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-03-16 Impact factor: 4.379