| Literature DB >> 34787563 |
Ruhee Shah1, Alessandra Della Porta2, Sherman Leung1, Margaret Samuels-Kalow3, Elizabeth M Schoenfeld4, Lynne D Richardson5,6,7, Michelle P Lin5,6,7.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Social emergency medicine (EM) is an emerging field that examines the intersection of emergency care and social factors that influence health outcomes. We conducted a scoping review to explore the breadth and content of existing research pertaining to social EM to identify potential areas where future social EM research efforts should be directed.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34787563 PMCID: PMC8597693 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2021.4.51518
Source DB: PubMed Journal: West J Emerg Med ISSN: 1936-900X
Figure 1Publication selection and exclusion for all topic areas.
Figure 2Summary of results across all categories by article type and number of publications by year.
Top: 1. Observational: 74%, Interventional: 11%, Systematic Review: 2%, Commentary: 13% 2. Observational: 63%, Interventional: 10%, Systematic Review: 10%, Commentary: 24% 3. Observational: 52%, Interventional: 0%, Systematic Review: 10%, Commentary: 39% 4. Observational: 65%, Interventional: 13%, Systematic Review: 9%, Commentary: 13% 5. Observational: 42%, Interventional: 15%, Systematic Review: 5%, Commentary: 37% 6. Observational: 64%, Interventional: 5%, Systematic Review: 0%, Commentary: 32% 7. Observational: 83%, Interventional: 4%, Systematic Review: 0%, Commentary: 13% 8. Observational: 73%, Interventional: 18%, Systematic Review: 0%, Commentary: 9% 9. Observational: 81%, Interventional: 9%, Systematic Review: 3%, Commentary: 6% 10. Observational: 75%, Interventional: 11%, Systematic Review: 8%, Commentary: 6% 11. Observational: 84%, Interventional: 7%, Systematic Review: 1%, Commentary: 8%12. Observational: 87%, Interventional: 6%, Systematic Review: 3%, Commentary: 6% 13. Observational: 100%, Interventional: 0%, Systematic Review: 0%, Commentary: 0% 14. Observational: 100%, Interventional: 0%, Systematic Review: 0%, Commentary, 0%, 15. Observational: 100%, Interventional, 0%, Systematic Review, 0%, Commentary, 0% 16. Observational: 50%, Interventional: 0%, Systematic Review: 50%, Commentary: 0% 17. Observational: 63%, Interventional: 0%, Systematic Review: 13%, Commentary: 25% 18. Observational: 0%, Interventional: 33%, Systematic Review: 0%, Commentary: 67%
Number of included publications and their most frequent study objectives in the social emergency medicine literature.
| Topic area (590) | Study objectives |
|---|---|
| Firearms (62) | Prevalence |
| Child abuse (114) | Prevalence |
| Elder abuse (31) | Prevalence |
| Intimate partner violence (120) | Prevalence |
| Human trafficking (19) | Patient characteristics |
| Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer health (22) | Prevalence of IPV |
| Immigration (24) | ED utilization |
| Incarceration (11) | ED utilization (post-release) |
| Language (32) | Aspects of ED care (triage, HPI, management of care, interpreter utilization, ED resource utilization, length of stay, discharge, follow-up care) |
| Literacy (34) | Screening (literacy and health literacy) |
| Housing/homelessness (73) | ED utilization |
| Food insecurity (29) | Prevalence |
| Transportation (2) | ED access |
| Financial insecurity (2) | Financial burden of specific chief complaints |
| Education (2) | ED utilization |
| Employment (3) | ED utilization |
| Social determinants of health (8) | ED utilization |
| SEM training (3) | Educational Intervention |
ED, emergency department, IPV, intimate partner violence; HPI, history of present illness.
ED, emergency department; SNAP, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; SEM, social emergency medicine.
Figure 3A–D. Depiction of publication type and timeline of publications for A. firearm, B. child abuse, C. interpersonal violence, and D. homelessness topic areas in the social emergency medicine literature.