| Literature DB >> 33970865 |
PengFei Li1,2, Lin Xu1,2, Tingting Tang1,3, Xiaoqian Wu1,2, Cheng Huang1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has spread around the world and has increased the public's need for health information in the process. Meanwhile, in the context of lockdowns and other measures for preventing SARS-CoV-2 spread, the internet has surged as a web-based resource for health information. Under these conditions, social question-and-answer communities (SQACs) are playing an increasingly important role in improving public health literacy. There is great theoretical and practical significance in exploring the influencing factors of SQAC users' willingness to adopt health information.Entities:
Keywords: Zhihu; health information adoption; social question-and-answer community; structural equation model
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33970865 PMCID: PMC8143873 DOI: 10.2196/27811
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Internet Res ISSN: 1438-8871 Impact factor: 5.428
Figure 1The model of social question-and-answer community users’ willingness to adopt health information.
The factor load, Cronbach α, average variance extraction (AVE), and composite reliability (CR) values of each variable.
| Variables and indices | Factor load | Cronbach α | AVE | CR | |||||
|
| .881 | .636 | .883 | ||||||
|
| PE1 | .804 |
|
|
| ||||
|
| PE2 | .819 |
|
|
| ||||
|
| PE3 | .824 |
|
|
| ||||
|
| PE4 | .787 |
|
|
| ||||
|
| .450 | .450 | .621 | ||||||
|
| EE1 | .657 |
|
|
| ||||
|
| EE3 | .685 |
|
|
| ||||
|
| .774 | .531 | .773 | ||||||
|
| SI1 | .745 |
|
|
| ||||
|
| SI2 | .688 |
|
|
| ||||
|
| SI3 | .752 |
|
|
| ||||
|
| .760 | .520 | .764 | ||||||
|
| FC1 | .783 |
|
|
| ||||
|
| FC2 | .662 |
|
|
| ||||
|
| FC3 | .714 |
|
|
| ||||
|
| .819 | .603 | .819 | ||||||
|
| PR1 | .789 |
|
|
| ||||
|
| PR2 | .812 |
|
|
| ||||
|
| PR3 | .725 |
|
|
| ||||
|
| .852 | .596 | .854 | ||||||
|
| WAHI1 | .716 |
|
|
| ||||
|
| WAHI2 | .821 |
|
|
| ||||
|
| WAHI3 | .704 |
|
|
| ||||
|
| WAHI4 | .838 |
|
|
| ||||
aPE: performance expectation.
bEE: effort expectancy
cSI: social influence.
dFC: facilitating condition.
ePR: perceived risk.
fWAHI: willingness to adopt health information.
Discriminant validity matrix.a
| Variables | Performance expectation | Effort expectancy | Social influence | Facilitating condition | Perceived risk | WAHIb |
| Performance expectation | .797 | N/Ac | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Effort expectancy | .535 | .671 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Social influence | .589 | .507 | .729 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Facilitating condition | .609 | .449 | .590 | .721 | N/A | N/A |
| Perceived risk | .038 | .289 | .160 | .144 | .777 | N/A |
| WAHI | .607 | .444 | .553 | .576 | .125 | .772 |
| AVEd | .636 | .450 | .531 | .520 | .603 | .596 |
aThe diagonal of the matrix is the square root of AVE of the corresponding variable.
bWAHI: willingness to adopt health information.
cN/A: not applicable.
dAVE: average variance extraction.
Statistical description of the sample.
| Variables and categories | Value, n (%) | ||
|
| |||
|
| Male | 179 (29.93) | |
|
| Female | 419 (69.90) | |
|
| |||
|
| ≤18 | 21 (3.51) | |
|
| 19-38 | 563 (94.15) | |
|
| 39-58 | 14 (2.34) | |
|
| |||
|
| Senior high school and below | 7 (1.17) | |
|
| Junior college | 10 (1.67) | |
|
| Undergraduate | 477 (79.77) | |
|
| Master and above | 104 (17.39) | |
Model fitting.
| Indices and values | Standard value | Fitting | |
|
| |||
|
| 2.954 | <5 | Acceptable |
|
| 2.954 | <3 | Ideal |
|
| |||
|
| 0.057 | <0.08 | Acceptable |
|
| 0.057 | <0.05 | Ideal |
|
| |||
|
| 0.929 | >0.9 | Ideal |
|
| |||
|
| 0.912 | >0.9 | Ideal |
|
| |||
|
| 0.952 | >0.9 | Ideal |
|
| |||
|
| 0.940 | >0.9 | Ideal |
|
| |||
|
| 0.952 | >0.9 | Ideal |
aRMSEA: root mean square error of approximation.
Path test of the structural equation.
| Hypotheses | Path | Unstandardized estimates | Standardized estimates (SEa) | Critical ratio | Results | |
| H1 | PEb to WAHIc | .280 | .282 (.084) | 3.314 | <.001 | Accept |
| H2 | EEd to WAHI | .036 | .027 (.141) | 0.256 | .79 | Reject |
| H3 | SIe to WAHI | .224 | .238 (.098) | 2.296 | .02 | Accept |
| H4 | FCf to WAHI | .262 | .279 (.085) | 3.080 | .002 | Accept |
| H5 | PRg to WAHI | .030 | .032 (.036) | 0.825 | .41 | Reject |
aSE: standard error.
bPE: performance expectation.
cWAHI: willingness to adopt health information.
dEE: effort expectancy.
eSI: social influence.
fFC: facilitating condition.
gPR: perceived risk.
The significance of moderating effects.
| Path | Gender | Age | Education level |
| PEa to WAHIb | √c |
|
|
| SId to WAHI |
|
|
|
| FCe to WAHI |
|
|
|
aPE: performance expectation.
bWAHI: willingness to adopt health information.
cThe moderating effect was significant at the .05 level.
dSI: social influence.
eFC: facilitating condition.
Hierarchical regression test of moderating effects.
| Index | Model 1a | Model 2b | |||||
|
| B | B | |||||
| Performance expectation | 0.331 | 8.126 (597) | <.001 | 0.375 | 8.123 (597) | <.001 | |
| Social influence | 0.210 | 5.250 (597) | <.001 | 0.190 | 5.029 (597) | <.001 | |
| Facilitating conditions | 0.251 | 6.171 (597) | <.001 | 0.249 | 6.179 (597) | <.001 | |
| Gender | N/Ac | N/A | N/A | 0.094 | 1.913 (597) | <.001 | |
| Interaction itemd | N/A | N/A | N/A | −0.170 | −2.390 (597) | .02 | |
aModel 1 had an R2 value of 0.461 (P<.001) and an F test value (F3,594) of 169.643.
bModel 2 had an R2 value of 0.470 (P<.001) and an F test value (F5,592) of 104.804.
cN/A: not applicable.
dThe interaction item for the gender and performance expectation.
Figure 2The moderating effect of gender on the "PE to WAHI" path. PE: performance expectation; WAHI: willingness to adopt health information.