| Literature DB >> 31443586 |
Grace X Ma1,2, Lin Zhu3, Steven E Shive3,4, Guo Zhang3, Yvette R Senter5, Pablo Topete6, Brenda Seals3, Shumenghui Zhai3, MinQi Wang7, Yin Tan3.
Abstract
Objective Asian Americans' food purchasing, cooking, and eating patterns are not well understood. Greater insight into these behaviors is urgently needed to guide public health interventions of dietary behaviors in this population. The present study aims to examine the effects of a community-level intervention on food purchasing and preparation, nutrition knowledge, and health awareness in Asian Americans. Methods From 2015 to 2017, we conducted the Improving Diets with an Ecological Approach for Lifestyle (IDEAL-REACH) intervention to increase access to healthy food or beverage options for the Asian-American population in the Philadelphia metropolitan area. Participants (1110 at pre- and 1098 at post-assessment) were recruited from 31 community-based organizations (CBOs). We assessed Asian Americans' dietary behaviors, nutrition knowledge, and awareness of heart health. Results The results of pre-post intervention comparisons showed that the IDEAL-REACH intervention was successful in promoting whole grains consumption, reducing sodium consumption, and raising knowledge and awareness related to nutrition and heart health. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is one of the first initiatives in the U.S. to engage CBOs to promote healthier dietary behaviors. The findings show that CBOs serve as a powerful platform for community-level interventions to improve healthy nutrition behaviors in Asian-American communities.Entities:
Keywords: Asian American; community intervention; health disease prevention; nutrition
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31443586 PMCID: PMC6747408 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16173054
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Sociodemographic, Language, and Health-Related Factors.
| Characteristics | Baseline | 12-Month Follow-Up | χ2 ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| CBO ethnicity (sites) | |||
| Chinese | 6 (19.35%) | 6 (19.35%) | |
| Korean | 12 (38.71%) | 12 (38.71%) | |
| Vietnamese | 9 (29.03%) | 9 (29.03%) | |
| Filipino | 4 (12.90%) | 4 (12.90%) | |
| Race/ethnicity | 2.91 (4) | ||
| Chinese | 264 (23.85%) | 248 (23.24%) | |
| Korean | 344 (31.07%) | 360 (33.74%) | |
| Vietnamese | 292 (26.38%) | 270 (25.30%) | |
| Filipino | 196 (17.71%) | 174 (16.31%) | |
| Other | 11 (0.99%) | 15 (1.41%) | |
| Age | 15.47 (3) *** | ||
| 18–29 | 45 (4.16%) | 73 (6.85%) | |
| 30–44 | 222 (20.54%) | 255 (23.94%) | |
| 45–60 | 428 (39.59%) | 419 (39.94%) | |
| >60 | 386 (35.71%) | 318 (29.86%) | |
| Gender | 7.44 (1) | ||
| Male | 298 (28.11%) | 346 (33.62%) | |
| Female | 762 (71.89%) | 683 (66.38%) | |
| Education | 2.72 (2) | ||
| <High school graduate | 253 (23.67%) | 286 (26.75%) | |
| High School | 260 (24.32%) | 252 (23.57%) | |
| University and above | 556 (52.01%) | 531 (49.67%) | |
| Employment status | 4.90 (4) | ||
| Employed | 515 (47.47%) | 557 (51.91%) | |
| Unemployed | 79 (7.28%) | 75 (6.99%) | |
| Retired | 267 (24.61%) | 234 (21.81%) | |
| Homemaker | 195 (17.97%) | 176 (16.40%) | |
| Student | 29 (2.67%) | 31 (2.89%) | |
| English proficiency | 8.72 (1) * | ||
| Not at all/not well | 675 (62.68%) | 606 (56.42%) | |
| Well/fluently | 402 (37.32%) | 468 (43.57%) | |
| Language spoken at home | 12.07 (2) * | ||
| English | 74 (6.85%) | 69 (6.41%) | |
| Native Asian language | 780 (72.22%) | 713 (66.26%) | |
| English and native Asian language both | 226 (20.93%) | 294 (27.32%) | |
| Has health insurance | 925 (84.94%) | 936 (86.99%) | 1.52 (1) |
| Has a regular physician to visit | 914 (84.16%) | 912 (84.92%) | 0.20 (1) |
| Self-rated health | 5.73 (1) * | ||
| Excellent/good | 869 (79.95%) | 902 (83.90%) | |
| Poor/very poor | 218 (20.06%) | 173 (16.09%) |
* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.
Food Purchases, Preparation Practices, and Consumption.
| Baseline | 12-Month Follow-Up | χ2 ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Size of regular soy sauce purchased | 0.82 (2) | ||
| Small bottle | 258 (23.50%) | 250 (23.02%) | |
| Regular bottle | 693 (63.11%) | 676 (62.25%) | |
| Gallon canister | 147 (13.39%) | 160 (14.37%) | |
| Regular soy sauce purchasing interval, month † | 1.86 (1.54), 0.25–6 | 2.02 (1.65), 0.25–6 | t = −2.36 * |
| M(SD), range | |||
|
| |||
| White rice bag size | 6.35 (2) | ||
| 5 pounds or less | 176 (16.62%) | 212 (20.17%) | |
| 10–35 pounds | 626 (59.11%) | 569 (54.14%) | |
| 40 pounds or more | 257 (24.27%) | 270 (25.69%) | |
| White rice purchasing interval, month † | 1.94 (1.45), 0.25–6 | 2.11 (1.40), 0.5–6 | t = −2.64 ** |
| M(SD), range | |||
| Brown rice bag size | 51.94 (3) *** | ||
| Does not eat brown rice | 265 (26.74%) | 170 (17.97%) | |
| 5 pounds or less | 215 (31.79%) | 349 (36.89%) | |
| 10–35 pounds | 376 (37.94%) | 397 (41.97%) | |
| 40 pounds or more | 35 (3.53%) | 30 (3.17%) | |
| Brown rice purchase interval, month † | 1.88 (1.38), 0.25–6 | 1.80 (1.24), 0.25–5 | t = −1.19 |
| M(SD), range | |||
|
| |||
| Types of oil purchased | |||
| Canola | 307 (27.66%) | 400 (36.56%) | 19.93 (1) *** |
| Sesame | 155 (13.96%) | 209 (19.10%) | 10.55 (1) *** |
| Corn | 238 (21.44%) | 220 (20.11%) | 0.59 (1) |
| Olive | 432 (38.92%) | 408 (37.29%) | 0.62 (1) |
| Vegetable | 202 (18.20%) | 195 (17.82%) | 0.05 (1) |
| Container size of oil purchased | 3.97 (2) | ||
| Small bottle | 155 (14.31%) | 182 (17.28%) | |
| Regular bottle | 688 (63.53%) | 634 (60.21%) | |
| Gallon canister | 240 (22.16%) | 237 (22.51%) | |
| Oil purchase interval, month † | 1.91 (1.46), 0.25–6 | 2.31 (1.64), 0.5–6 | t = −6.05 *** |
| M(SD), range | |||
|
| |||
| Sugar | 506 (53.66%) | 563 (53.67%) | 0 (1) |
| Sodium | 406 (43.15%) | 485 (46.15%) | 1.81 (1) |
| Calories | 354 (37.64%) | 446 (42.48%) | 5.2 (1) * |
| Fiber | 173 (18.35%) | 301 (28.67%) | 29.20 (1) *** |
| Unsaturated fat | 198 (21.00%) | 232 (22.10%) | 0.35 (1) |
| Trans Fat | 245 (25.98%) | 319 (30.38%) | 4.74 (1) * |
| Saturated Fat | 172 (18.28%) | 194 (18.46%) | 0.01 (1) |
|
| 7 | ||
|
| 3.17 (1.41), 1–6 | 3.11 (1.34), 1–6 | t = 0.38 |
|
| |||
| Does not measure salt use | 830 (80.98%) | 818 (80.43%) | 0.10 (1) |
| Does measure salt use | 195 (19.02%) | 199 (19.57%) | |
|
| |||
| Does not measure oil use | 777 (76.25%) | 818 (80.27%) | 4.85 (1) * |
| Does measure oil use | 242 (23.75%) | 201 (19.73%) | |
|
| 848 (80.61%) | 849 (80.40%) | 0.01 (1) |
|
| 901 (85.48%) | 896 (84.77%) | 0.21 (1) |
|
| 692 (66.35%) | 773 (73.13%) | 11.46 (1) *** |
|
| |||
|
| 16.90 (2) *** | ||
| Never | 338 (30.98%) | 396 (36.97%) | |
| Sometimes | 600 (55.00%) | 577 (53.87%) | |
| Always | 153 (14.02%) | 98 (9.15%) |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, † winsorized at 95th percentile for baseline and 12-month follow-up separately.
Knowledge of Nutrition and Health Effects Related to Sodium, Oil, and Fiber.
| Baseline | 12-Month Follow-Up | χ2 ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| How much should people with diabetes exercise | 9.48 (1) ** | ||
| Right (most days of the wk for 30+ min) | 782 (72.34%) | 840 (78.07%) | |
| Wrong (other answers) | 299 (27.66%) | 236 (21.93%) | |
| Health benefit of physical activity score, | 0.64 (0.27), 0–1 | 0.63 (0.25), 0–1 | t = 0.90 |
| M(SD), range | |||
|
| |||
| Recommended daily sodium intake | 186.00 (1) *** | ||
| Right (one teaspoon) | 129 (12.07%) | 402 (37.54%) | |
| Wrong (other answers) | 940 (87.93%) | 669 (62.46%) | |
| Main source of sodium in American diet | 5.10 (1) * | ||
| Right (processed foods) | 374 (34.73%) | 425 (39.42%) | |
| Wrong (other answers) | 703 (65.27%) | 653 (60.58%) | |
|
| |||
| Healthiest type of fat | 12.01 (1) *** | ||
| Right (monounsaturated and polyunsaturated) | 448 (40.36%) | 524 (47.68%) | |
| Wrong (other answers) | 662 (59.64%) | 575 (52.32%) | |
| Healthy types of oils score | 0.47 (0.21), 0–1 | 0.50 (0.20), 0–1 | t = −3.45 |
| M(SD), range | |||
|
| |||
| Carbohydrates with highest fiber score, | 0.69 (0.27), 0–1 | 0.70 (.27), 0–1 | t = 0.87 |
| M(SD), range | |||
| Health benefits of high fiber diet score, | 0.49 (0.14), 0–0.86 | 0.49 (0.14), 0–0.86 | t = 0 |
| M(SD), range | |||
| Knowledge of sodium, oil, and fiber score, | 4.32 (1.22), 1.06–7.21 | 4.68 (1.35), 1.06–7.71 | t = 1.29 *** |
| M (SD), range (0–8) |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p <0.001.
Exposures to Health Promotions.
| Participants’ Exposure to Health Promotions | Baseline | 12-Month Follow-Up | χ2 ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Noticed signs that promoted healthier foods in general | 372 (35.43%) | 367 (35.32%) | 0.002 (1) |
| Noticed signs that promoted healthier oil | 296 (29.16%) | 352 (44.39%) | 44.88 (1) *** |
| Noticed signs that promoted whole grain | 296 (31.56%) | 342 (43.96%) | 28.01 (1) *** |
| Noticed signs that promoted low-sodium products | 266 (25.75%) | 350 (34.09%) | 17.05 (1) *** |
*** p <0.001.
Outcome Measures: Healthier Purchasing Behaviors at 12-Month Follow-Up Survey.
| Healthier Purchasing Behaviors | |
|---|---|
| Purchased low-sodium products in the past 6 months | 419 (40.37%) |
| Used in cooking | 299 (71.36%) |
| Family and respondent liked it | 323 (77.09%) |
| Would continue to use it in the future | 338 (80.67%) |
| Purchased whole grain products in the past 6 months | 377 (37.48%) |
| Used in cooking | 251 (68.71%) |
| Family and respondent liked it | 280 (78.21%) |
| Would continue to use it in the future | 302 (82.51%) |
| Purchased healthier oil in the past 6 months | 378 (37.80%) |
| Used in cooking | 290 (78.59%) |
| Family and respondent liked it | 301 (82.02%) |
| Would continue to use it in the future | 311 (83.38%) |
Results of Multivariate Logistical Regression of Three Healthier Food Purchasing Behaviors at 12-Month Follow-Up Survey.
| Regression Results | Purchased Low-Sodium Products | Purchased Whole Grain Products | Purchased Healthier Oil Products |
|---|---|---|---|
| β (s.e.) | β (s.e.) | β (s.e.) | |
| Knowledge score | 0.24 (0.07) *** | 0.33 (0.07) *** | 0.35 (0.07) *** |
| Noticed signs that promoted healthier foods in general (ref: no) | 0.59 (0.23) ** | 0.53 (0.32) | −0.55 (0.36) |
| Noticed signs that promoted less sodium | 0.20 (0.24) | - | - |
| Noticed signs that promoted more whole grain | - | 0.47 (0.33) | |
| Noticed signs that promoted healthier oil | - | - | 1.58 (0.36) *** |
| Ethnicity (ref: Chinese) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Korean | 0.19 (0.25) | −0.03 (0.26) | −0.005 (0.27) |
| Vietnamese | 0.05 (0.23) | −0.54 (0.26) * | 0.34 (0.25) |
| Filipino | 2.14 (0.33) *** | 2.15 (0.37) *** | 1.93 (.35) *** |
| Other Asian | 1.74 (0.77) * | 1.04 (0.83) | 1.28 (0.87) |
| Female (ref: male) | 0.49 (0.17) ** | 0.57 (0.19) ** | 0.62 (0.19) ** |
| Educational attainment (ref: < hs) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| high school | −0.09 (0.24) | −0.31 (0.27) | −0.23 (0.26) |
| college or higher | 0.33 (0.25) | −0.09 (0.28) | 0.20 (0.28) |
| English proficiency (ref: poor/not well) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Well/fluent | −0.28 (0.20) | 0.14 (0.22) | −0.03 (0.22) |
| Constant | −2.68 | −3.02 | −3.34 |
| Log-likelihood chi-square ( | 157.53 (11) *** | 193.12 (11) *** | 187.13 (11) *** |
| McFadden R-square | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.18 |
Abbreviation: s.e. = standard error; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.