| Literature DB >> 31443474 |
Herwig P Moll1, Julian Mohrherr2, Leander Blaas2,3, Monica Musteanu2,4, Patricia Stiedl2, Beatrice Grabner2, Katalin Zboray2,5, Margit König6, Dagmar Stoiber2,7, Thomas Rülicke8, Sabine Strehl6, Robert Eferl9, Emilio Casanova10,11.
Abstract
Genetically-engineered mouse models (GEMMs) lacking diseased-associated gene(s) globally or in a tissue-specific manner represent an attractive tool with which to assess the efficacy and toxicity of targeted pharmacological inhibitors. Stat3 and Stat5a/b transcription factors have been implicated in several pathophysiological conditions, and pharmacological inhibition of both transcription factors has been proposed to treat certain diseases, such as malignancies. To model combined inhibition of Stat3 and Stat5a/b we have developed a GEMM harboring a flox Stat3-Stat5a/b allele (Stat5/3loxP/loxP mice) and generated mice lacking Stat3 and Stat5a/b in hepatocytes (Stat5/3Δhep/Δhep). Stat5/3Δhep/Δhep mice exhibited a marked reduction of STAT3, STAT5A and STAT5B proteins in the liver and developed steatosis, a phenotype that resembles mice lacking Stat5a/b in hepatocytes. In addition, embryonic deletion of Stat3 and Stat5a/b (Stat5/3Δ/Δ mice) resulted in lethality, similar to Stat3Δ/Δ mice. This data illustrates that Stat5/3loxP/loxP mice are functional and can be used as a valuable tool to model the combined inhibition of Stat3 and Stat5a/b in tumorigenesis and other diseases.Entities:
Keywords: Cre/loxP; bacterial artificial chromosome; embryonic stem cells; gene targeting; liver steatosis; recombineering
Year: 2019 PMID: 31443474 PMCID: PMC6770775 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11091226
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Figure 1Conditional targeting the Stat5a, Stat5b and Stat3 loci. (A) ES cells targeting strategy. A BAC spanning the Stat5a/b and Stat3 loci was modified by introducing a neomycin resistance cassette flanked by FRT3 sites and containing a 5′loxP site upstream of the Stat5b locus. In a second recombineering step, a hygromycin resistance cassette flanked by two FRT sites and containing a 3′loxP site was introduced in the first intron of the Stat3 locus (depicted as a dotted line), thus floxing the entire coding regions of the Stat5a, Stat5b and Stat3 genes. (B) Southern blot analysis using EcoRI-digested genomic DNA from neomycin/hygromycin resistant ES cell clones and a probe localized 3′ downstream of the hygromycin cassette identified a band corresponding to the endogenous locus (wt, upper band) and the transgene (lower band). ES cell clones labeled with a star (9, 10, 11, 13 and 15) show roughly equal wt and transgene band intensities suggesting a correct targeting event or a random integration of two extra transgenic copies into the genome.
Figure 2Identification of correctly targeted ES cells. (A) FISH analysis of wt ES cells and clones 8 and 9 using the RPCI-23-362J7 BAC as a probe showing that clone 9 has undergone correct homologous recombination. Upper pictures: representative interphase nuclei. Lower pictures: representative metaphases. Red arrows: endogenous locus, blue arrow: ectopic transgene integration. (B) PCR analysis using primers (P1/Sp6 and P2/T7), which amplify the ends of the BAC-based targeting construct, fails to detect the presence of BAC-ends in ES cell clone 9. +: BAC DNA (positive control). −: wt ES cell DNA (negative control) LC: loading control. (C) Quantitative PCR using primer pairs (P3/P4, P5/P6 and P7/8) spanning the Stat5a/b and Stat3 loci shows that ES cell clone 9 harbors one copy of the Stat5a/b and Stat3 endogenous locus and one copy of transgene in its genome (of note, primers P3/P4 and P7/8 do not amplify the transgenic construct). (D) PCR analysis (primers P9/P10) of genomic DNA from ES cell clone 9 electroporated with a plasmid expressing the Cre recombinase shows a specific product confirming the functionality of the loxP sites. LC: loading control.
Quantification of the FISH analysis performed in the ES cell clones. FISH was performed using the RPCI-23-362J7 BAC as a probe in wildtype (wt) ES cells and clones 8, 9, 10, 11, 13 and 15. The result is expressed as the percentage of interphases (two hundred analyzed) containing one, two, three or four signals.
| % of Cell Interphases | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ES Clone | One Signal | Two Signals | Three Signals | Four Signals |
| wt | 1.5 | 73.0 | 20.5 | 5.0 |
| 8 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 85.0 | 6.0 |
| 9 | 4.5 | 93.5 | 2.0 | 0.0 |
| 10 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 27.5 | 69.5 |
| 11 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 83.5 | 12.5 |
| 13 | 0.0 | 11.0 | 80.0 | 9.0 |
| 15 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 29.0 | 70.0 |
Figure 3Validation of Stat5/3 mice. (A) PCR analysis of tail DNA using the primers P9/P11/P12 and P10/P13/P14 located in the region of the neomycin and hygromycin cassettes, respectively, showing the expected genotypes. (B) PCR analysis of genomic DNA extracted from different tissues revealed that the Stat5a/b and Stat3 loci are deleted solely in the liver of Stat5/3Δ mice (Liv: liver; Kid: kidney; Int: small intestine; Pan: pancreas; Lun: Lung; Hea: heart). (C) Western blot analysis using liver lysates from Stat5/3 and Stat5/3Δ mice shows reduced levels of STAT5A/B and STAT3 protein in the livers of Stat5/3Δ mice (HSC70: Heat Shock 70 kDa protein, loading control). Details can be found in Figure S2. (D) Stat5/3Δ mice develop liver steatosis. Upper pictures: representative macroscopic liver images of control and Stat5/3Δ mice. Lower pictures: representative liver sections from 8-week-old control and Stat5/3Δ mice (n = 3) stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE), scale bar: 50 µm.
Genotype distribution of Stat5/3 wt, heterozygote and homozygote animals. Number of embryos and pups from Stat5/3/+ × Stat5/3/+ breeding distributed accordingly to the genotype (expected number in brackets). Statistical differences from the expected numbers were analysed with the chi-square test using GraphPad QuickCalcs.
| Genotype | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage |
|
|
| |
| Blastocysts | 8 (9) | 23 (18) | 5 (9) | 0.1942 |
| Born mice | 22 (12) | 27 (25) | 0 (12) | <0.0001 |
List of additional primers used in this study.
| Primer | 5′-3′Sequence |
|---|---|
| P1 | CATCATACACTTCATTTTAGGACTGCC |
| P2 | TGGCCCAGTGTTCAGTGCTCTTCTTACC |
| P3 | GGGACTCTTAAAATGGAAATCTGG |
| P4 | CAGAATGTTCTAGAAGGTTTGG |
| P5 | GTGCATGCTTTGTAGGAATTCTATGG |
| P6 | GTGGTTCCTCTGGTTTGTTACGTAGG |
| P7 | ATCTTGGACACAAATGCAGAGCC |
| P8 | CTGGTTAAGAAAAAGCCATTCTACC |
| P9 | GCTTTGAAGCTTCATCCCTATCC |
| P10 | TAGCTTAGGATAATTTTCTTCATG |
| P11 | GGTTGGCGCCTACCGGTGGATGTGG |
| P12 | CAGTAGCCCAGTGTCCCAGCCAAACAG |
| P13 | AATCAGTAATAAGTGATGATAGAAGGG |
| P14 | CAGATGACCACTCCAGTCGGGGG |
| P15 | ACCAGCCAGCTATCAACTCG |
| P16 | TTACATTGGTCCAGCCACC |
| P17 | TCTGAGCATGGCCTCTAA |
| P18 | GCTGGAGTAAATTTCACAGTG |
| P19 | TCTCACTCGGAAGGACAT |
| Sp6 | GATTTAGGTGACACTATAG |
| T7 | GTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGC |