Literature DB >> 10611243

Engineering mouse chromosomes with Cre-loxP: range, efficiency, and somatic applications.

B Zheng1, M Sage, E A Sheppeard, V Jurecic, A Bradley.   

Abstract

Chromosomal rearrangements are important resources for genetic studies. Recently, a Cre-loxP-based method to introduce defined chromosomal rearrangements (deletions, duplications, and inversions) into the mouse genome (chromosome engineering) has been established. To explore the limits of this technology systematically, we have evaluated this strategy on mouse chromosome 11. Although the efficiency of Cre-loxP-mediated recombination decreases with increasing genetic distance when the two endpoints are on the same chromosome, the efficiency is not limiting even when the genetic distance is maximized. Rearrangements encompassing up to three quarters of chromosome 11 have been constructed in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells. While larger deletions may lead to ES cell lethality, smaller deletions can be produced very efficiently both in ES cells and in vivo in a tissue- or cell-type-specific manner. We conclude that any chromosomal rearrangement can be made in ES cells with the Cre-loxP strategy provided that it does not affect cell viability. In vivo chromosome engineering can be potentially used to achieve somatic losses of heterozygosity in creating mouse models of human cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10611243      PMCID: PMC85158          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.20.2.648-655.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  21 in total

Review 1.  Cloning high molecular weight DNA fragments by the bacteriophage P1 system.

Authors:  N L Sternberg
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Trisomy eight in ES cells is a common potential problem in gene targeting and interferes with germ line transmission.

Authors:  X Liu; H Wu; J Loring; S Hormuzdi; C M Disteche; P Bornstein; R Jaenisch
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.780

3.  A site-directed chromosomal translocation induced in embryonic stem cells by Cre-loxP recombination.

Authors:  A J Smith; M A De Sousa; B Kwabi-Addo; A Heppell-Parton; H Impey; P Rabbitts
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Gene targeting in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  R Ramírez-Solis; A C Davis; A Bradley
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  Mapping human YAC clones by fluorescence in situ hybridization using Alu-PCR from single yeast colonies.

Authors:  A Baldini; E A Lindsay
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  1994

6.  Engineering a mouse balancer chromosome.

Authors:  B Zheng; M Sage; W W Cai; D M Thompson; B C Tavsanli; Y C Cheah; A Bradley
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Conserved cysteine to serine mutation in tyrosinase is responsible for the classical albino mutation in laboratory mice.

Authors:  T Yokoyama; D W Silversides; K G Waymire; B S Kwon; T Takeuchi; P A Overbeek
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-12-25       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Down syndrome phenotypes: the consequences of chromosomal imbalance.

Authors:  J R Korenberg; X N Chen; R Schipper; Z Sun; R Gonsky; S Gerwehr; N Carpenter; C Daumer; P Dignan; C Disteche
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Chromosome engineering in mice.

Authors:  R Ramírez-Solis; P Liu; A Bradley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-12-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Genetic approaches to the study of the molecular basis of human cancer.

Authors:  C M Croce
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  60 in total

1.  Creating a transloxation. Engineering interchromosomal translocations in the mouse.

Authors:  G Testa; A F Stewart
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Cre-loxP recombination system for large genome rearrangements in Lactococcus lactis.

Authors:  Nathalie Campo; Marie-Line Daveran-Mingot; Kees Leenhouts; Paul Ritzenthaler; Pascal Le Bourgeois
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Rapid generation of nested chromosomal deletions on mouse chromosome 2.

Authors:  D F LePage; D M Church; E Millie; T J Hassold; R A Conlon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Conditional gene expression in the mouse inner ear using Cre-loxP.

Authors:  Brandon C Cox; Zhiyong Liu; Marcia M Mellado Lagarde; Jian Zuo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-24

Review 5.  Applications of the site-specific recombinase Cre to the study of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Rosemary Oh-McGinnis; Meaghan J Jones; Louis Lefebvre
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Establishment of a tissue-specific RNAi system in C. elegans.

Authors:  Hiroshi Qadota; Makiko Inoue; Takao Hikita; Mathias Köppen; Jeffrey D Hardin; Mutsuki Amano; Donald G Moerman; Kozo Kaibuchi
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.688

7.  CRE recombinase-based positive-negative selection systems for genetic manipulation in Trypanosoma brucei.

Authors:  Michael D Scahill; Irena Pastar; George A M Cross
Journal:  Mol Biochem Parasitol       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 1.759

8.  Inducing segmental aneuploid mosaicism in the mouse through targeted asymmetric sister chromatid event of recombination.

Authors:  Arnaud Duchon; Vanessa Besson; Patricia Lopes Pereira; Laetitia Magnol; Yann Hérault
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  An Lck-cre transgene accelerates autoantibody production and lupus development in (NZB × NZW)F1 mice.

Authors:  R K Nelson; K A Gould
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.911

10.  Proteasome activator PA200 is required for normal spermatogenesis.

Authors:  Bernard Khor; Andrea L Bredemeyer; Ching-Yu Huang; Isaiah R Turnbull; Ryan Evans; Leonard B Maggi; J Michael White; Laura M Walker; Kay Carnes; Rex A Hess; Barry P Sleckman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.