Lydia Brandl1, Yina Zhang2, Nina Kirstein3, Andrea Sendelhofert4, Sophie Luise Boos5, Peter Jung6, Florian Greten7, Roland Rad8, Antje Menssen9. 1. Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU), Thalkirchnerstraße 36, 80337 Munich, Germany. Electronic address: Lydia.Brandl@med.uni-muenchen.de. 2. Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU), Thalkirchnerstraße 36, 80337 Munich, Germany; Research group "Signaling pathways in colorectal cancer"; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), and German Cancer Research Center DKFZ, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: zhangyina800113@hotmail.com. 3. Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU), Thalkirchnerstraße 36, 80337 Munich, Germany; Research group "Signaling pathways in colorectal cancer". Electronic address: nina_kirstein@hotmail.com. 4. Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU), Thalkirchnerstraße 36, 80337 Munich, Germany. Electronic address: Andrea.Sendelhofert@med.uni-muenchen.de. 5. Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU), Thalkirchnerstraße 36, 80337 Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), and German Cancer Research Center DKFZ, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: Sophie_Luise.Boos@med.uni-muenchen.de. 6. Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU), Thalkirchnerstraße 36, 80337 Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), and German Cancer Research Center DKFZ, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: peter.jung@med.uni-muenchen.de. 7. Institute for Tumor Biology and Experimental Therapy, Georg-Speyer-Haus, Paul-Ehrlich-Straße 42-44, 60596 Frankfurt/Main, Germany; Frankfurt Cancer Institute, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60596 Frankfurt/Main, Germany;and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center DKFZ, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: Greten@gsh.uni-frankfurt.de. 8. Institute of Molecular Oncology and Functional Genomics, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Center for Translational Cancer Research (TranslaTUM), Technical University of Munich, Germany; Department of Medicine II, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: roland.rad@tum.de. 9. Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU), Thalkirchnerstraße 36, 80337 Munich, Germany; Research group "Signaling pathways in colorectal cancer"; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), and German Cancer Research Center DKFZ, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: menssenantje@gmail.com.
Abstract
We recently described a positive feedback loop connecting c-MYC, NAMPT, DBC1 and SIRT1 that contributes to unrestricted cancer cell proliferation. Here we determine the relevance of the loop for serrated route intestinal tumorigenesis using genetically well-defined BrafV600E and K-rasG12D mouse models. In both models we show that c-MYC and SIRT1 protein expression increased through progression from hyperplasia to invasive carcinomas and metastases. It correlated with high NAMPT expression and was directly associated to activation of the oncogenic drivers. Assessing functional and molecular consequences of pharmacological interference with factors of the loop, we found that inhibition of NAMPT resulted in apoptosis and reduced clonogenic growth in human BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer cell lines and patient-derived tumoroids. Blocking SIRT1 activity was only effective when combined with a PI3K inhibitor, whereas the latter antagonized the effects of NAMPT inhibition. Interfering with the positive feedback loop was associated with down-regulation of c-MYC and temporary de-repression of TP53, explaining the anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects. In conclusion we show that the c-MYC-NAMPT-DBC1-SIRT1 positive feedback loop contributes to murine serrated tumor progression. Targeting the feedback loop exerted a unique, dual therapeutic effect of oncoprotein inhibition and tumor suppressor activation. It may therefore represent a promissing target for serrated colorectal cancer, and presumably for other cancer types with deregulated c-MYC.
We recently described a positive feedback loop connecting c-MYC, NAMPT, DBC1 and SIRT1 that contributes to unrestricted cancer cell proliferation. Here we determine the relevance of the loop for serrated route intestinal tumorigenesis using genetically well-defined BrafV600E and K-rasG12D mouse models. In both models we show that c-MYC and SIRT1 protein expression increased through progression from hyperplasia to invasive carcinomas and metastases. It correlated with high NAMPT expression and was directly associated to activation of the oncogenic drivers. Assessing functional and molecular consequences of pharmacological interference with factors of the loop, we found that inhibition of NAMPT resulted in apoptosis and reduced clonogenic growth in humanBRAF-mutant colorectal cancer cell lines and patient-derived tumoroids. Blocking SIRT1 activity was only effective when combined with a PI3K inhibitor, whereas the latter antagonized the effects of NAMPT inhibition. Interfering with the positive feedback loop was associated with down-regulation of c-MYC and temporary de-repression of TP53, explaining the anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects. In conclusion we show that the c-MYC-NAMPT-DBC1-SIRT1 positive feedback loop contributes to murine serrated tumor progression. Targeting the feedback loop exerted a unique, dual therapeutic effect of oncoprotein inhibition and tumor suppressor activation. It may therefore represent a promissing target for serrated colorectal cancer, and presumably for other cancer types with deregulated c-MYC.
Besides the classical route to colorectal carcinomas (CRC), an alternative, serrated route in the development of colorectal tumors exists which comprises 15% of all CRCs [1], [2], [3]. It is characterized by lesions with “saw-tooth” crypt architecture like hyperplastic polyps, sessile serrated adenoma, traditional serrated adenoma and invasive serrated adenocarcinoma [2]. Serrated lesions have either BRAF (80%) or KRAS (20%) mutations. Clinicopathologically, BRAF-mutant tumors represent less than 10% of metastatic CRCs. They are associated with a worse prognosis than BRAF wild-type tumors [4], [5]. Of the BRAF-mutant tumors, the most aggressive molecular subtypes are mismatch repair proficient, microsatellite stable (MSS), and usually harbor TP53 mutations [6]. Although these tumors initially respond better to therapy, the prognosis of patients is very poor, with a median survival of 10 months, compared to 35 months for patients with BRAF wild-type tumors [5], [7].Successful generation of in vivo models for the serrated route allowed to comprehensively study defining hallmarks in the development of serrated lesions. Conditional Vil-Cre;Braf (which corresponds to humanBRAFV600E) and Vil-Cre,LSL-K-ras/Ink4a/Arf knock-in mouse models develop murine serrated hyperplasia (mSH), murine serrated adenomas (mSA) and invasive carcinomas in the intestine [8], [9], confirming observations made on serrated route lesions of patients. Both models provide functional evidence for the tumor initiating potential of mutant, constitutively active Braf and K-Ras proteins.We recently described a positive feedback loop connecting the oncoprotein c-MYC, the NAD+ generating metabolic enzyme nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT), the NAD+-dependent protein deacetylase sirtuin-1 (SIRT1), and the SIRT1 inhibitor deleted in breast cancer 1 (DBC1) (also called cell cycle and apoptosis regulator protein 2 (CCAR2)). Activation of the c-MYC-NAMPT-DBC1-SIRT1 loop contributes to proliferation and survival of cancer cells [10], reviewed in [11]. Our subsequent in situ studies confirmed the functional link between c-MYC, NAMPT and SIRT1 as their high expression is correlated in various types of adenomas and tumors [10], [12], [13], [14]. Importantly, c-MYC is also a major target of WNT signaling which is upregulated early in the conventional pathway of colorectal carcinogenesis [15]. As we have shown before, deregulated c-MYC is associated with high SIRT1 levels in classical adenomas and carcinomas [10], [14].In the serrated route, elevated expression of c-MYC and SIRT1 is linked to the presence of KRAS and BRAF mutations and strongly associated with higher grades of malignancy [12]. Since SIRT1 inhibits pro-apoptotic factors such as TP53 by deacetylation [16], [17], SIRT1 activity antagonizes apoptosis and senescence. Therefore, constitutive activation of this positive feedback loop can contribute to the development and maintenance of tumors.However, some evidence from in situ and in vivo studies also point to potential tumor-suppressive functions of SIRT1 [18]. SIRT1 is therefore considered a double-edged sword that has several tumor promoter and suppressor functions depending on the tissue and context. In particular, although the role of SIRT1 in cancer is still unclear, NAMPT and SIRT1 activity enhancers are currently investigated for their potential to extend healthspan and prolong lifespan in humans [19], [20], [21].In view of this, the role of SIRT1 and its upstream regulator NAMPT in tumors should be conclusively clarified at first.We analyzed c-MYC, NAMPT, DBC1, and SIRT1 expression in genetically well-defined Braf and K-ras/Ink4a/Arfmouse models to determine whether activation of c-MYC and its downstream components of the feedback loop are directly linked to the initiating Braf and K-ras mutations and required for the development of serrated lesions. Additionally, we assessed the impact of NAMPT and SIRT1 inhibition in BRAF-mutant human CRC cell lines and patient-derived tumoroids and determined molecular changes following pharmacological disruption of the positive feedback loop. Since the PI3K pathway is commonly altered in CRC [22] and constitutive PI3K signaling is a central mechanism of resistance to various therapies [23], we analyzed short- and long-term effects of combination therapy with a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor.
Materials and Methods
Mouse Tissue
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) material from seven control mice, and from mice with the genotypes: Vil-Cre;Braf, Vil-Cre;Braf;p53, Vil-Cre;Braf;p16
[9] and Vil-Cre;LSL-K-ras/Ink4a/Arf was used [8]. Table 1 provides a summary of murine serrated lesions analyzed in this study comprising normal mucosa, mSH, murine serrated adenomas with low-grade dysplasia (mSA-LGD), murine serrated adenomas with high-grade dysplasia (mSA-HGD), invasive carcinomas and metastases in lymph node, lung, fat tissue and liver. Animal procedures were carried out in compliance with the institutional guidelines of the local government (Regional government of Upper Bavaria).
Table 1
Number of Investigated Serrated Lesions in Braf and K-Ras Mutant Mice
Number of Investigated Serrated Lesions in Braf and K-Ras Mutant MicemSHmurine serrated hyperplasia; mSA-LGD murine serrated adenoma low-grade dysplasia; mSA-HGD murine serrated adenoma high-grade dysplasia.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was performed on 3 μm consecutive tissue sections of FFPE tumor samples using IHC protocols as detailed in Table 2. All primary antibodies were incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. All slides were counterstained with hematoxylin (Vector Laboratories, CA, USA, Cat. No. H-3401). Staining specificity was evaluated using system controls without primary antibodies, and immunoglobulin isotype control antibodies. Specificity of the SIRT1 and NAMPT antibody was confirmed using NAMPT or SIRT1 siRNA knockdown in cell lines, followed by PFA fixation of cells, embedding and IHC analysis. In addition, NAMPT antibody specificity was validated using mouse tissue in which both Nampt alleles had been deleted by Cre recombinase.
Evaluation of c-MYC, NAMPT, SIRT1, and DBC1 Staining
For c-MYC, SIRT1, and DBC1, nuclear expression was evaluated. For NAMPT nuclear and cytoplasmic staining was determined. In normal mucosa and mSH, positive staining confined to the basal third of the crypts in the large intestine or the basal third of villi and crypt in the small intestine was defined as low. Strong was defined as staining from the base to the surface of the crypts, or villi and crypts. In mSA-LGD and mSA-HGD, only areas with intraepithelial neoplasia were considered. In mSA-LGD, mSA-HGD, invasive adenocarcinomas and metastases, the percentage of stained cells was categorized as negative (0%), low (1–30%), moderate (31–70%) and strong (71–100%).
Cell Lines and Reagents
HT29, COLO 205 and COLO 741 cells were provided by Roland Rad (TU Munich). BRAF-mutant COLO 741 were initially classified as colorectal cancer cells, but are now considered to derive from a pelvic melanoma metastasis [24]. Therefore, data obtained with COLO 741 are not shown except for immunoblots. HT29 cells were maintained in DMEM (high glucose), RKO cells (kindly provided by Bert Vogelstein) were maintained in MyCoy's 5A modified medium, COLO 741 and COLO 205 cells were kept in RPMI 1640 medium. All media were supplemented with 10% FCS, 1% L-glutamine and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen). FK866 (AdipoGen), sirtinol (Enzo Life Sciences) and the PI3K inhibitor (LY294002 hydrochloride (Tocris)) were dissolved in DMSO and stored at −20 °C. Cells were seeded at a concentration of 0.5 × 104 in 12 well plates. Thirty hours after seeding, FK866, the solvent DMSO, or FK866 combined with LY294002 were added to sub-confluent cells for 72 hours. Sirtinol, the solvent DMSO, or sirtinol combined with LY294002 were added for 48 hours.
3-D Tumoroid Culture
Tumoroids (patient derived tumor organoid 1 (PDTO1) and PDTO2) were derived from two patients undergoing colectomy at the Klinikum Großhadern (LMU Munich). Samples were irreversibly anonymized and work with patient-derived tumor cells has been approved by the LMU ethics commission (project no. 591–16 UE).Patient-derived tumoroids embedded in matrigel (BD Corning) were cultured in humantumor organoid media (HTOM) consisting of advanced DMEM/F12 media supplemented with 20 mM HEPES and 2 mM glutamax (ThermoFisher Scientific), 1,25 mM n-acetyl cysteine, B27 supplement retinoic acid free (Gibco), 25 ng/ml noggin (Peprotech), 50 ng/ml human recombinant EGF (Peprotech), 7.5 μM SB202190 (Sigma), 0.5 μM galunisertib (LY2157299) (Biozol Diagnostics), 10 nM prostaglandin E2 (Sigma), and 50 μg/ml normocin (Invivogen). For passaging, matrigel and tumoroids were re-suspended in cell recovery solution and incubated on ice for 30 min. Released tumoroids were centrifuged and supernatant was removed. Tumoroids were incubated at 37 °C in 0.025% trypsin/PBS (Gibco). Three thousand disaggregated single cells were plated per 25 μl matrigel in a 48-well plate. Following solidification, HTOM media supplemented with 10 μM Y-27632 (Rock Inhibitor, Biozol Diagnostics) was added and tumoroids were maintained at 37 °C and 5%CO2.
3-D Tumoroid Drug Treatment and Cell Viability Assessment
Forty-eight hours after tumoroid seeding, sirtinol, FK866, or vehicle control (DMSO) were added to the cultures, respectively. Due to different growth rates, tumoroids were analyzed either 7 days (PDTO1), or 5 days (PDTO2) after addition of the drugs. 3-D cultures were documented with a Nikon AZ-100 macroscope and enhanced focal images were generated with NIS-elements D5.00 software (Nikon).Viability of tumoroids was determined using the Cell Titer-Glo3D assay (Promega) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Luminescence was measured using a Berthold luminometer (LB96V). All experiments were performed in triplicates.
DNA Content Analysis
Propidium iodide (PI) staining and DNA content analysis was performed as described before [10] using BD Accuri C6 flow cytometer. Experiments were done in biological triplicates and repeated at least twice.
Statistics
Statistics of DNA content analyses were performed in GraphPad Prism 5 using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test with alpha = 0.05.Statistical analyses of two experimental groups of tumoroids was done by t-test, analyses of multiple treatment groups of tumoroids was done by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett's multiple comparisons test.
Long-Term Clonogenic Assay
Cells (3000–6000/ well) were seeded in 6-well plates. Thirty hours after seeding, drugs or DMSO were added once to the cells and plates were sealed using plastic wrap. After 2 weeks, colonies were washed with 1x PBS and fixed with cold methanol (99%) for 30 minutes and stained in 1x modified Giemsa Stain (GS500, Sigma-Aldrich) with gentle rocking (1 hour at room temperature, and 12 hours at 4 ° C). After washing with distilled water, colonies were left to air-dry. Assay conditions were established over a wide range of cell and drug concentrations to obtain cell densities that allowed documentation and quantification. Each drug concentration was tested at least twice. Colonies were quantified using ImageJ software.
Western Blot Analysis
Immunoblot analysis was done as described before with minor modifications [25]. Cells were harvested at sub-confluence using RIPA buffer and protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). After sonification, 30–40 μg cell lysate was subjected to electrophoresis. Proteins were blotted on PVDF membranes using Towbin buffer (20% methanol). For detection of c-MYC, SIRT1, p21, NAMPT, TP53 and β-actin antibodies were used as described before [10]. Quantifications of immunoblot signals were done with ImageJ software.
Results
High Expression of c-MYC, NAMPT, DBC1 and SIRT1 in Murine Serrated Intestinal Lesions
To investigate whether the activation of c-MYC and its downstream effectors of the c-MYC/NAMPT/DBC1/SIRT1 feedback loop play a role in the development of serrated lesions, we made use of the Braf and K-ras/Ink4a/Arfmouse models. These mouse models develop serrated adenocarcinomas and are characterized by amplified MAPK signaling, while they diverge in other molecular features [8], [9]. Brafmice progress from hyperplasia to dysplasia, they display p16 and p19 upregulation, MSI-H, and spontaneous Tp53 mutations, especially in high-grade dysplasia. Invasive carcinomas develop in a subset of mice and their frequency was considerably increased by the knockin of a mutant Tp53 gene or p16 inactivation [9]. KrasG12Dint mice develop serrated hyperplasia and lesions are characterized by MSS or MSI-L, the absence of WNT pathway induction, p16 overexpression and oncogene-induced senescence [8]. Overcoming this tumor suppressive mechanism by Ink4a/Arf deletion results in more progressed invasive adenocarcinomas in these mice, independent of WNT pathway activation.We assessed the expression of c-MYC, NAMPT, DBC1 and SIRT1 in progression series of intestinal lesions of 28 Braf and 14 K-rasmice, including Tp53, p16 and Arf mutant compound mice. Table 1 gives a summary of the analyzed mice.In the mucosa of control mice and in murine serrated hyperplasia (mSH) of all Braf and K-ras, including Tp53, p16, and Arf compound mice, nuclear c-MYC and SIRT1 expression was restricted to the proliferative zone in the basal third of the crypts in the small (Figure 1, A and B; Supplemental Figure 1, A and B) and large intestine. NAMPT was expressed in the cytoplasm of crypt and villus epithelial cells, in the latter partly also in the nucleus (Figure 1C; Supplemental Figure 1C). Nuclear DBC1 was homogenously expressed along the villi and crypts of the small intestine (Figure 1D; Supplemental Figure 1D) and crypts of the large intestine. In all murine serrated adenomas with low-grade dysplasia (mSA-LGD) and murine serrated adenomas with high-grade dysplasia (mSA-HGD) (Supplemental Figure 2), invasive carcinomas (Figure 2), and metastases (Figure 3) (exemplary for lung) strong nuclear expression of c-MYC, SIRT1 and DBC1, and strong cytoplasmic, but no nuclear NAMPT expression was detected in nearly all cells. These observations were in accordance with upregulation of other effectors downstream of c-MYC in the Brafmouse model, such as p19
[9]. Unexpectedly, high-grade dysplastic lesion (Supplemental Figure 2) and carcinomas (Figure 2) that are characterized by additional WNT pathway activation did not reveal stronger expression of c-MYC, or other components of the feedback loop.
Figure 1
c-MYC and SIRT1 are expressed in the basal third of the crypts, while NAMPT and DBC1 are expressed throughout crypts and villi in normal mucosa of wild-type mice.
Immunohistochemical analyses of c-MYC, SIRT1, NAMPT and DBC1 in normal intestinal mucosa of control mice (n = 7). c-MYC (a) and SIRT1 (b) are expressed in the proliferative zone of the crypts. NAMPT is expressed in the cytoplasm of the epithelial cells of the crypts and in the cytoplasm and the nucleus of the villi (c). DBC1 displays homogenous expression along the crypts and villi of the small intestine (d). (Original magnification 200×).
Figure 2
c-MYC, SIRT1, NAMPT and DBC1 are strongly expressed in invasive carcinomas of Vil-Cre;Braf mice.
Expression of c-MYC, SIRT1, NAMPT and DBC1 was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in invasive carcinomas (n = 16). Nuclear c-MYC (a), nuclear SIRT1 (b), cytoplasmic NAMPT (c) and nuclear DBC1 (d) are strongly expressed as more than 70% of the tumor cells reveal a positive staining. Inset shows higher magnification of cytoplasmic NAMPT staining in carcinoma cells. (Original magnification 100×, inset 630×).
Figure 3
High c-MYC, SIRT1, NAMPT and DBC1 expression in lung metastasis of Vil-Cre;Braf;p16 mice.
Immunohistochemical analyses of lung metastasis (n = 4) shows nuclear c-MYC (a), nuclear SIRT1 (b), cytoplasmic NAMPT (c) and nuclear DBC1 (d) are strongly expressed since more than 70% of the tumor cells reveal a positive staining. (Original magnification 200×).
c-MYC and SIRT1 are expressed in the basal third of the crypts, while NAMPT and DBC1 are expressed throughout crypts and villi in normal mucosa of wild-type mice.Immunohistochemical analyses of c-MYC, SIRT1, NAMPT and DBC1 in normal intestinal mucosa of control mice (n = 7). c-MYC (a) and SIRT1 (b) are expressed in the proliferative zone of the crypts. NAMPT is expressed in the cytoplasm of the epithelial cells of the crypts and in the cytoplasm and the nucleus of the villi (c). DBC1 displays homogenous expression along the crypts and villi of the small intestine (d). (Original magnification 200×).c-MYC, SIRT1, NAMPT and DBC1 are strongly expressed in invasive carcinomas of Vil-Cre;Brafmice.Expression of c-MYC, SIRT1, NAMPT and DBC1 was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in invasive carcinomas (n = 16). Nuclear c-MYC (a), nuclear SIRT1 (b), cytoplasmic NAMPT (c) and nuclear DBC1 (d) are strongly expressed as more than 70% of the tumor cells reveal a positive staining. Inset shows higher magnification of cytoplasmic NAMPT staining in carcinoma cells. (Original magnification 100×, inset 630×).High c-MYC, SIRT1, NAMPT and DBC1 expression in lung metastasis of Vil-Cre;Braf;p16mice.Immunohistochemical analyses of lung metastasis (n = 4) shows nuclear c-MYC (a), nuclear SIRT1 (b), cytoplasmic NAMPT (c) and nuclear DBC1 (d) are strongly expressed since more than 70% of the tumor cells reveal a positive staining. (Original magnification 200×).The concomitant high expression indicated the interconnectedness of c-MYC, NAMPT, and SIRT1 in a positive feedback loop. Its association with the initiating oncogenic drivers pointed to a contribution to tumorigenesis in these mice.
BRAF-Mutant CRC Cell Lines are Sensitive to NAMPT Inhibition
Some molecular subtypes of BRAF-mutant CRCs have a poor prognosis and are refractory to therapy. In regard of this unmet medical need, we tested whether NAMPT and SIRT1 may represent therapeutic targets in human serrated colorectal cancer. We used two cell lines, HT29 and COLO 205 that display the combination of genomic alterations (mutant BRAF, mutant TP53, and microsatellite stability (MSS)) associated with very bad prognosis. Furthermore, we used RKO, a BRAF-mutant line with microsatellite instability (MSI) that harbors TP53 wild-type alleles (according to the COSMIC database at https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cell_lines). We assessed DNA content upon short-term drug exposures, and colony growth after 14 days (long-term) in the three cell lines to obtain insight into drug kinetics and mechanisms of drug action.The three cell lines revealed substantial sensitivity difference upon exposure to the NAMPT inhibitor FK866. COLO 205 CRC cells, which grow partly in suspension, were highly sensitive. Low amounts of FK866 (5 nM) strongly induced apoptosis (70% sub-G1) (Figure 4A) and led to pronounced growth reduction in the clonogenic assay (Figure 4B, upper row). FK866 (30 nM) resulted in a nine-fold increased apoptosis rate in HT29 (Figure 4A) and clonogenic growth was completely abolished in the presence of 60 nM FK866 (Figure 4B, upper row). NAMPT inhibition was ineffective in RKO after 3 days of treatment using up to 150 nM FK866 (Figure 4A). In contrast, in the presence of 40 nM FK866 clonogenic growth of RKO cells almost completely stopped after 2 weeks (Figure 4B, upper row).
Figure 4
Inhibition of NAMPT by FK866 leads to apoptosis and reduced colony growth while the combination with a PI3K inhibitor has antagonistic effects in BRAF-mutant CRC cell lines.
(a) The indicated cell lines were exposed to increasing concentrations of the NAMPT inhibitor FK866, or solvent (0) for 3 days. FACS was used to determine DNA content of biological triplicates. Percentages with standard deviation of sub-G1, G1, S and G2/M cell cycle phases are depicted. Percentage values of sub-G1 fractions are given as indicated. Statistical analysis of one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test. * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001.
(b) Colony-forming assays document cell viability upon single and combined pharmacological inhibition of NAMPT and PI3K in BRAF-mutant human colorectal cancer cell lines. Clonogenic assays were performed after 2 weeks inoculation of FK866, or solvent (0), as single agent (upper row), or its combination with the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 (lower row) at the indicated concentrations. Image J software was used for quantification of Giemsa stained colonies. The area covered by untreated cells was defined as 1. Ratios of inhibitor treated cells versus untreated cells are given in the lower right corners.
Inhibition of NAMPT by FK866 leads to apoptosis and reduced colony growth while the combination with a PI3K inhibitor has antagonistic effects in BRAF-mutant CRC cell lines.(a) The indicated cell lines were exposed to increasing concentrations of the NAMPT inhibitor FK866, or solvent (0) for 3 days. FACS was used to determine DNA content of biological triplicates. Percentages with standard deviation of sub-G1, G1, S and G2/M cell cycle phases are depicted. Percentage values of sub-G1 fractions are given as indicated. Statistical analysis of one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test. * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001.(b) Colony-forming assays document cell viability upon single and combined pharmacological inhibition of NAMPT and PI3K in BRAF-mutant humancolorectal cancer cell lines. Clonogenic assays were performed after 2 weeks inoculation of FK866, or solvent (0), as single agent (upper row), or its combination with the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 (lower row) at the indicated concentrations. Image J software was used for quantification of Giemsa stained colonies. The area covered by untreated cells was defined as 1. Ratios of inhibitor treated cells versus untreated cells are given in the lower right corners.Immunoblot analysis showed that the most sensitive line, COLO 205, expressed the lowest NAMPT levels, whereas HT29 and RKO with high expression were intermediate- or non-responsive (Supplemental Figure 3) suggesting that sensitivity to FK866 was inversely correlated with NAMPT protein levels.
Ineffective Monotherapy Using the SIRT1 Inhibitor Sirtinol in BRAF-Mutant CRC Cell Lines
Compared to controls, exposition to the SIRT1 inhibitor sirtinol (70 μM or 100 μM) only slightly induced apoptosis (sub-G1 population) in COLO 205 (1.6-fold), RKO (4.4-fold) and HT29 (6.6-fold) after two days of drug treatment (Supplemental Figure 4A). Sirtinol (70 μM) resulted in a G1-cell cycle arrest in COLO 205 and HT29 cells. Despite the initial mild apoptosis increase, colony growth was unaffected in all lines (Supplemental Figure 4B, upper rows). In contrast, sirtinol strongly abrogated colony growth of the melanoma cell line COLO 741 (that until recently was misidentified as a colorectal cancer cell line) when applied in the same concentration range in a parallel experiment (data not shown).Immunoblot analysis showed low, intermediate, and high SIRT1 protein expression in COLO 205, HT29 and RKO, respectively (Supplemental Figure 3). The expression inversely correlated with the efficacy of apoptosis induction. Levels of c-MYC protein correlated with NAMPT and SIRT1 in the three CRC cell lines, which was consistent with our previous observation [10]. In line with the role of the PI3K pathway in blocking c-MYC degradation [26], PIK3CA-mutant HT29 and RKO lines expressed higher c-MYC levels than COLO 205.
BRAF-Mutant Patient-Derived Colorectal Organoids are Highly Sensitive to NAMPT Inhibition and Insensitive to SIRT1 Inhibition
Next, we tested whether patient derived CRC organoids (PDTOs) displayed similar drug sensitivities as the established CRC cell lines grown in a two-dimensional monolayer. These tumoroids grow in a three-dimensional matrix, which more accurately resembles architecture and behavior of cancer tissues and may lead to different cellular behavior and drug responses [27]. We analyzed NAMPT and SIRT1 inhibition in two BRAF-mutant patient derived tumoroids that were microsatellite instable (MSI), while we could not get access to BRAF-mutant tumor organoids of the MSS subtype due to the low probability of co-occurrence of BRAF mutations and MSS (6.4%, [28]). FK866 treatment had strong growth-inhibitory effects on the 3-D culture of both patients' tumoroids (Figure 5A). With 5 or 7 days of treatment, FK866 significantly affected viability of both primary tumor organoids in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 5B). Cell viability was strongly reduced even at low concentrations of 0.5 nM FK866, indicating very high sensitivity of these tumoroids towards NAMPT inhibition. Sirtinol did not show any effect on growth of both tumoroids at 10 μM (Supplemental Figure 5), the maximum applicable concentration. The combination therapy was not assessed in organoids because combining FK866 was not beneficial in all CRC cell lines and sirtinol precipitated at higher concentrations.
Figure 5
Colony-forming assays demonstrate growth inhibition of patient-derived BRAF-mutant human colorectal tumoroids upon NAMPT inhibition.
(a) FK866 efficiently inhibits growth of a primary, a BRAF(V600E) mutation harboring tumor organoid culture (PDTO2). Single tumoroids plated in 3-D matrigel were inoculated with the indicated concentrations of FK866, or the solvent (DMSO) 48 hours after seeding. Organoid growth was documented via enhanced focal imaging microscopy 5 days after treatment. One exemplary image of FK866 treated and DMSO treated tumoroids is depicted. Scale bars represent 1 mm. Dashed lines represent margins of matrigel droplets.
(b) Concentration dependent effect on cell viability of tumoroid cultures of two patients (PDTO1 and PDTO2) was assessed via indirect luminometric detection of the cellular ATP content (3-D Cell TiterGlo assay). Cell viability was determined relative to the DMSO control (0 nM FK866). Data were obtained from biological triplicates of PDTO1 7 days, and PDTO2 5 days after drug addition, respectively. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Experiments on PDTOs were performed in triplicates. For statistics analyses one-way ANOVA with Dunnett's multiple comparisons test was used. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (****: p < .0001).
Colony-forming assays demonstrate growth inhibition of patient-derived BRAF-mutant humancolorectal tumoroids upon NAMPT inhibition.(a) FK866 efficiently inhibits growth of a primary, a BRAF(V600E) mutation harboring tumor organoid culture (PDTO2). Single tumoroids plated in 3-D matrigel were inoculated with the indicated concentrations of FK866, or the solvent (DMSO) 48 hours after seeding. Organoid growth was documented via enhanced focal imaging microscopy 5 days after treatment. One exemplary image of FK866 treated and DMSO treated tumoroids is depicted. Scale bars represent 1 mm. Dashed lines represent margins of matrigel droplets.(b) Concentration dependent effect on cell viability of tumoroid cultures of two patients (PDTO1 and PDTO2) was assessed via indirect luminometric detection of the cellular ATP content (3-D Cell TiterGlo assay). Cell viability was determined relative to the DMSO control (0 nM FK866). Data were obtained from biological triplicates of PDTO1 7 days, and PDTO2 5 days after drug addition, respectively. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Experiments on PDTOs were performed in triplicates. For statistics analyses one-way ANOVA with Dunnett's multiple comparisons test was used. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (****: p < .0001).Taken together, sirtinol applied as monotherapy in the low micromolar range did not affect growth of CRC cell lines and primary tumoroids. In contrast, all BRAF-mutant cell lines, as well as patient-derived tumoroids were highly sensitive to FK866-mediated inhibition of NAMPT activity.
Combination with a PI3K Inhibitor Antagonized Efficacy of NAMPT Inhibition While It Sensitized to SIRT1 Inhibition in BRAF-Mutant CRC Cell Lines
Activating mutations in the genes encoding the PI3K signaling system are common in many humancancers and have been associated with resistance to various targeted therapies [23]. Since HT29 and RKO cell lines harbor mutations in PIK3CA, we asked whether concomitant inhibition of PI3K increases sensitivity to NAMPT or SIRT1 inhibitors. We used LY294002, an ATP-competitive and isoform-nonselective PI3K inhibitor and determined concentrations for each cell line that allowed to assess additive effects when given as combination therapy with NAMPT or SIRT1 inhibitors. Addition of LY294002 (40 μM) for 2 days resulted in a sub-G1 fraction below 20% (Supplemental Figure 6), and less than 30%, when added for 3 days to HT29 and RKO cells (Figure 6B). We used 40 μM of LY294002 for the analyses of drug combinations in HT29 and RKO, and due to their higher sensitivity, 20 μM for COLO 205.
Figure 6
Combined inhibition of PI3K and SIRT1 reveals synergistic action while combining PI3K and NAMPT inhibitors has antagonistic effects in BRAF-mutant CRC cell lines.
(a) DNA content analyses demonstrate effects of combined inhibition: Results of inhibition of PI3K, using LY294002, combined with SIRT1 inhibition by sirtinol analyzed 2 days after addition of drug, or solvent (0) to the indicated cell lines.
(b) Results of the co-treatment with PI3K inhibitor and NAMPT inhibitor FK866 for 3 days are depicted.
DNA content analyses with percentages of sub-G1, G1, S and G2/M cell cycle phases of biological triplicates with standard deviation are given with percentage values of sub-G1 fractions. Statistical analysis of one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test. * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001.
Combined inhibition of PI3K and SIRT1 reveals synergistic action while combining PI3K and NAMPT inhibitors has antagonistic effects in BRAF-mutant CRC cell lines.(a) DNA content analyses demonstrate effects of combined inhibition: Results of inhibition of PI3K, using LY294002, combined with SIRT1 inhibition by sirtinol analyzed 2 days after addition of drug, or solvent (0) to the indicated cell lines.(b) Results of the co-treatment with PI3K inhibitor and NAMPT inhibitor FK866 for 3 days are depicted.DNA content analyses with percentages of sub-G1, G1, S and G2/M cell cycle phases of biological triplicates with standard deviation are given with percentage values of sub-G1 fractions. Statistical analysis of one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test. * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001.Compared to the PI3K inhibitor alone, combined inhibition with the SIRT1 inhibitor collectively resulted in drug synergism as the rate of apoptosis raised 1.7-, 2.5-, and 2.8-fold in RKO, COLO 205, and HT29, respectively (Figure 6A). The effect on clonogenic growth was less pronounced because combined inhibition only sensitized cells to sirtinol (Supplemental Figure 4B, lower row). The strongest effect was observed in RKO in which co-treatment with 70 μM sirtinol and 20 μM PI3K inhibitor resulted in 50% reduced colony growth compared to LY294002 alone.In contrast, in COLO 205 cells combined inhibition of NAMPT and PI3K reduced the rate of apoptotic cells compared to FK866 alone (Figure 6B). The clonogenic assay of these cells also revealed slight antagonistic action of the therapy combination at 5 nM FK866 (Figure 4B, lower row). Compared to the PI3K inhibitor alone, the combination FK866 and LY294002 also reduced the apoptotic fraction (20.3% to 14.8%; 27.2% to 22.3%) in HT29 and RKO, respectively (Figure 6B). Extended incubation for 2 weeks with the drug combination strongly interfered with growth inhibition as seen with FK866 alone in HT29 and RKO (Figure 4B, lower row).Taken together, concomitant blocking NAMPT and PI3K activities resulted in antagonistic effects in the three BRAF-mutant CRC cell lines tested.
Interfering with the c-MYC-NAMPT-DBC1-SIRT1 Positive Feedback Loop has a Dual Therapeutic Effect
SIRT1 is linked to c-MYC in a positive feedback loop that involves post-translational modifications affecting protein stability [10]. We therefore asked whether pharmacological targeting NAMPT or SIRT1 influences expression of factors of the loop and their downstream effectors. To assess the role of TP53 we used parental BRAF-mutant, TP53 wild-type RKO (TP53) cells, and RKO (TP53) cells in which both alleles of TP53 were deleted by targeted homologous recombination. Immunoblot analyses revealed lower c-MYC expression upon inhibition of SIRT1 by sirtinol, and upon inhibition of NAMPT by FK866, when compared to controls. These effects were more pronounced in RKO TP53 than in RKO TP53 cells (Figure 7A). SIRT1 protein levels were also lower in the presence of sirtinol (Figure 7A). We also assessed the expression of the cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 1/ p21 protein. It served as a read-out for the activity of TP53, which induces p21 [29], and for the activity of c-MYC, which represses p21 [30], [31], [32], [33].
Figure 7
Molecular changes associated with pharmacological interference with the c-MYC-NAMPT-SIRT1 positive feedback loop in cancer cells
(a) Immunoblot analysis of SIRT1, c-MYC and p21 expression in RKO Tp53 and RKO Tp53 CRC cells treated with sirtinol [30 μM] for 48 hours, or FK866 [5 nM] for 72 hours. The TP53 status of the cell lines was confirmed by immunoblot analysis (data not shown). β-actin served as loading control.
(b) Model of the c-MYC-NAMPT-SIRT1 positive feedback loop in cancer cells and pathways affected by interference with pharmacological inhibitors.
In cancer, deregulation of c-MYC leads to constitutive activation of the loop which contributes to permanent proliferation and survival of cells (see also author summary of [10]). Applying FK866 or sirtinol to inhibit NAMPT or SIRT1, respectively, disrupts the feedback loop and exerts a dual therapeutic effect, namely downregulation of c-MYC and de-repression of pro-apoptotic factors, such as TP53, and FOXO proteins. Both effects may contribute to growth arrest and cell death. Increased sensitivity to the drug combination of sirtinol and the PI3K inhibitor (LY294002) may be attributed to inactivation of SIRT1 by sirtinol together with the LY294002-mediated translocation of SIRT1 to the cytoplasm. Alleviation of SIRT1- and Akt-mediated FOXO protein repression may then lead to induction of apoptosis. Gray squares: activation, white squares: inhibition.
Molecular changes associated with pharmacological interference with the c-MYC-NAMPT-SIRT1 positive feedback loop in cancer cells(a) Immunoblot analysis of SIRT1, c-MYC and p21 expression in RKO Tp53 and RKO Tp53 CRC cells treated with sirtinol [30 μM] for 48 hours, or FK866 [5 nM] for 72 hours. The TP53 status of the cell lines was confirmed by immunoblot analysis (data not shown). β-actin served as loading control.(b) Model of the c-MYC-NAMPT-SIRT1 positive feedback loop in cancer cells and pathways affected by interference with pharmacological inhibitors.In cancer, deregulation of c-MYC leads to constitutive activation of the loop which contributes to permanent proliferation and survival of cells (see also author summary of [10]). Applying FK866 or sirtinol to inhibit NAMPT or SIRT1, respectively, disrupts the feedback loop and exerts a dual therapeutic effect, namely downregulation of c-MYC and de-repression of pro-apoptotic factors, such as TP53, and FOXO proteins. Both effects may contribute to growth arrest and cell death. Increased sensitivity to the drug combination of sirtinol and the PI3K inhibitor (LY294002) may be attributed to inactivation of SIRT1 by sirtinol together with the LY294002-mediated translocation of SIRT1 to the cytoplasm. Alleviation of SIRT1- and Akt-mediated FOXO protein repression may then lead to induction of apoptosis. Gray squares: activation, white squares: inhibition.In RKO TP53+/+, we observed a temporary slight increase of p21 expression 48 hours after FK866 addition (Supplemental Figure 7A), that was almost absent at 72 hours (Supplemental Figure 7B). Elevated p21 expression corresponded to lower levels of c-MYC and of SIRT1, the negative regulator of TP53 (Figure 7, Supplemental Figure 7A). In TP53 RKO, p21 expression slightly increased 72 hours after FK866 inoculation (Supplemental Figure 7B), which also correlated with reduced c-MYC levels (Figure 7A).In contrast, sirtinol had no effect on p21 when analyzed 24, 48 (Supplemental Figure 7C), and 72 hours after drug administration (data not shown).In summary, these data show, that pharmacological interference with NAMPT or SIRT1 activities represented a strategy to indirectly target the oncoprotein c-MYC, in both TP53 wild-type and TP53-deficient BRAF-mutant CRC cells. Additionally, inhibition of NAMPT was associated with transient de-repression of TP53, which may have contributed to the capacity of FK866 to induce apoptosis, cell cycle arrest and abrogated colony growth.
Discussion
Up-Regulation of Feedback Loop Components in Murine Serrated Tumor Progression
Using Braf and K-ras/Ink4a/Arf knock-in mouse models for serrated route CRC, we showed that in the proliferative zone of early mSH and in malignant progression of both mouse models c-MYC expression was high and correlated with up-regulation of SIRT1. Up-regulated c-MYC and SIRT1 associated with high NAMPT expression, which suggested that the positive feedback loop connecting the factors is active in murine serrated tumor progression. In agreement with our data, upregulation of c-MYC and downstream targets have previously been confirmed in these mouse models [8], [9]. It is also in accordance with our previous findings of correlated high expression of c-MYC and SIRT1 in serrated route tumor progression [12] and with our data that showed elevated expression of c-MYC, NAMPT, and SIRT1 in humanBRAF or KRAS serrated colorectal adenomas [14]. Together, these lines of evidence strongly suggested that oncogenic Braf and K-ras are directly associated with activation of the c-MYC-NAMPT-SIRT1 positive feedback loop in serrated route tumorigenesis. The expression of the feedback loop factors was not associated to the MSI status, WNT pathway activation, or TP53 pathway inactivation that are divergent in both mouse models.By providing NAD+, NAMPT contributes to activation of NAD+-dependent SIRT1 [34]. We have demonstrated, that NAMPT is a direct transcriptional target of c-MYC and a necessary mediator for high SIRT1 levels in cancer cells [10]. Correlating with NAMPT induction, conditional activation of a c-MYC allele increases the NAD+/NADH ratio [10]. Along these lines, a recent study showed elevated NAD+/NADH ratios in large collections of cancer cell lines that corresponded to high NAMPT or other NAD+ generating pathway activity [35]. Recently it was shown that increased NAD(H) in tumors caused by NAMPT activation promotes progression in the AOM/DSS colorectal cancermouse model [36].We showed that NAMPT was highly expressed in all epithelial cells in the small and large intestine of healthy control mice, corresponding to our observation of NAMPT expression in the normal human large intestine [14]. These findings strongly point to an essential role of NAMPT for intestinal epithelial cell physiology. High NAMPT activity explains why intestinal cells are able to have the highest (40× higher at maximum) NAD+ production flux rate compared to other mouse tissues [37].Interestingly, in the proliferative compartment of normal crypts and in the highly proliferating dysplastic/neoplastic cells in both mouse models, NAMPT was localized exclusively in the cytoplasm. In some differentiated villus epithelial cells, NAMPT was also localized in the nucleus. This supports that the subcellular distribution of NAMPT is associated with the proliferative state of the cell. Previous studies pointed to a cell cycle dependent regulation of NAMPT localization, with higher levels in the cytoplasm than in the nucleus in proliferating cells [38], [39].We detected high DBC1 expression in serrated lesions of Braf and K-rasmice. In normal cells the DBC1 protein binds to and inhibits SIRT1 [40]. However in cells with deregulated c-MYC, such as cancer cells, this function is impeded by c-MYC-mediated sequestration of DBC1, as we have shown [10]. In aggreement with this interaction of DBC1 and SIRT1 is absent, or weak in several tumor cell lines [41]. These studies suggest that deregulated c-MYC in serrated lesions may prevent DBC1-SIRT1 interactions and thus allow for hyperactive SIRT1 function, despite of high DBC1 expression.Oncogenic mutations in either K-ras or Braf lead to constitutive activation of the MAPK/ERK1/2 pathway, contributing to post-translational regulation of c-MYC in serrated lesions [42]. In addition, in 50% of Brafmice high-grade dysplasia lesions and carcinomas, the Wnt pathway is activated during serrated tumorigenesis [9]. Since c-MYC is a transcriptional target of β-catenin/TCF4 [15], it may also contribute to the up-regulation of c-MYC and the feedback loop in serrated Braf-induced tumor progression. However, since all high-grade lesions and carcinomas displayed equally elevated protein expression, our IHC data did not reveal an association to WNT pathway activity.Invasive carcinomas arise in a subset of the Brafmice with long latency. The two major tumor suppressive mechanisms in serrated lesions are apoptosis and oncogene-induced senescence [43]. The introduction of mutant Tp53 in Braf knock-in mice, or inactivation of the CDK inhibitor p16 in Braf and K-Rasmice significantly accelerate and enhance tumor progression and promote formation of additional metastases [8], [9]. As SIRT1 prevents apoptosis and senescence by negatively regulating TP53 and other pro-apoptotic factors, in addition to promoting c-MYC activity [10], enhanced SIRT1 function in serrated lesions may therefore be of critical importance to antagonize the two mayor tumor suppressive mechanism and thus contribute to tumor progression. Initial studies of the mouse models also analyzed microsatellite stability. Of the BrafV637E-induced mSA and carcinomas 39.4% were MSI-H and only 6% were MSS, whereas all BrafV637E-induced hyperplastic polyps were MSS or MSI-L [9]. In contrast, the majority of murineK-ras-mutated tumors was either MSI-L (40%) or MSS (50%), and only 10% of the tumors were MSI-H [8]. Thus, the MSI status of tumors in both mouse models closely resembled the molecular characteristics of humanBRAF or KRAS-mutated serrated polyps and carcinomas. The feedback loop components c-MYC, NAMPT, SIRT1 and DBC1 were consistently highly expressed in all lesions of both mouse models, suggesting that it is not directly linked to MSS or MSI status.
Targeting NAMPT is Efficacious as Monotherapy While Only Combination with a PI3K Inhibitor Sensitizes to Targeting SIRT1
In vitro and preclinical studies have demonstrated that the two enzymes of the feedback loop, NAMPT and SIRT1 represent potential cancer drug targets [44], [45], [46], [47], [48]. We recently screened public pharmacogenomic databases to identify colorectal cancer cell lines with vulnerability to NAMPT and SIRT1 inhibitors [14]. The resulting cell lines all showed molecular signatures, such as BRAF, RNF43 alterations, and microsatellite instability, which are characteristic features of serrated lesions.In order to assess the kinetics and mechanism of drug action in BRAF-mutant CRC cell lines, we compared short- and long-term treatments using pharmacological NAMPT and SIRT1 inhibitors. NAMPT inhibition as monotherapy was highly effective in most cell lines when assessed 3 days after drug addition. Most notably, longer drug treatments of 2 weeks revealed additional efficacies of mono- and combination-therapy. Such delayed responses should be taken into account in future strategies evaluating NAMPT inhibitors.Propagating cancer cells in three rather than two dimensions has been shown to create a reasonable heterogeneity at the cellular level with respect to proliferative capacity, hypoxic compartments, and Wnt and Notch signaling pathway activities which represent critical features of colorectal cancer stemness [49]. The preclinical model of tumoroids that reflect more natural organ conditions was highly sensitive to FK866. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show vulnerability of patient-derived, early passage CRC tumoroids towards NAMPT inhibition. It strongly supports NAMPT as a potential drug target in serrated CRC.Although our previous analyses of pharmacogenomics databases revealed increased sensitivity of serrated route CRC cell lines compared to classical Wnt-driven cell lines, this was only observed when very high concentrations above 100 μM of a SIRT1 inhibitor (EX527) were tested [14]. The present study confirmed this, since all BRAF-mutant CRC cell lines and tumoroids were unresponsive to SIRT1 inhibition by sirtinol monotherapy in the low micromolar range. However, the combination of sirtinol and PI3K inhibitor slightly sensitized cells regardless of the mutational status of PI3K or TP53. An explanation for the sensitization to sirtinol may be that PI3K inhibition also affects SIRT1 function at multiple levels. First, PI3K inhibition leads to translocation of SIRT1 to the cytoplasm [50]. This abrogates cellular resistance to apoptosis which is mediated only by nuclear SIRT1 [51]. Second, since the PI3K pathway and SIRT1 both negatively regulate FOXO1 and FOXO3a functions, concomitant inhibition of SIRT1 and PI3K may converge on FOXO protein activation which leads to induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest (Figure 7B). Thus, such potential dual inhibition of SIRT1, together with the dual activation of FOXO proteins may explain the observed efficacy of combining inhibitors of SIRT1 and PI3K.In contrast, co-inhibition of PI3K and NAMPT antagonized the effects of the NAMPT inhibitor. Tumor cells are extremely sensitive to NAMPT inhibition compared to normal cells, putatively due to their higher activity of NAD+ consuming enzymes. FK866-mediated NAMPT inhibition leads to exhaustion of cytoplasmic and nuclear NAD+, followed by ATP depletion, and either oncosis or autophagy and cell death [52]. Given that PI3K-mTOR inhibition robustly induces autophagy, by combining inhibition of NAMPT and PI3K, we expected to obtain additive or synergistic effects of excessive autophagic cell death. Surprisingly, co-inhibition of PI3K reduced the rate of cell death compared to FK866 monotherapy. A reason for this may be the high interconnection of PI3K with MAPK/ERK1/2 signaling pathways, with the intermediate metabolism network, and autophagy [53]. This leads to mutual feedback inhibition between MEK and PI3K signaling [23]. The close connection of the involved pathways has raised the speculation that inhibition of the PI3K-AKT–mTOR pathway may reduce sensitivity to metabolic inhibitors [23]. Although our results support this assumption, a detailed study of pharmacokinetics and mechanism of drug action will be necessary for the development of combination therapeutic strategies of SIRT1 and NAMPT inhibition.High sensitivity to NAMPT monotherapy of all BRAF-mutant cell lines and tumoroids strongly indicated NAMPT as a potential new drug target for serrated route CRCs, including MSI and MSS types that have the worst prognosis. In agreement with previous observations [54], and our recent database analysis of CRC cell lines [14], vulnerability to FK866 inversely correlated with NAMPT protein expression. Therefore, NAMPT levels may serve as a predictive marker for therapy responsiveness. In future studies aiming to assess the translational significance in more detail, high FK866 sensitivity observed in the MSS cell lines HT29 and COLO 205 also needs to be confirmed with patient derived BRAF-mutant MSS tumor organoids and in vivo using patient-derived tumor xenografts.
Molecular Changes Following Interference with the c-MYC-NAMPT-DBC1-SIRT1 Circuitry
SIRT1 regulates c-MYC and TP53 by deacetylation. While the c-MYC protein becomes stabilized and activated [10], the transcriptional activity of TP53 is suppressed following SIRT1-mediated deacetylation [16], [17]. In agreement with this positive feedback regulation that we previously established, we found that pharmacological inhibition of SIRT1 or NAMPT resulted in down-regulation of c-MYC. In addition, p21 levels slightly increased in Tp53 and also in Tp53 RKO cells upon inhibiting NAMPT by FK866. Since p21 is negatively regulated by c-MYC [30], [31], [32], [33], the results indicated that besides TP53, which induces p21, also reduced c-MYC activity may have contributed to elevated p21 expression. Both effects, down-regulation of c-MYC and activation of TP53, are most likely the consequence of decreased SIRT1 function (Model: Figure 7B) [10], [16], [17] and explain apoptosis and growth arrest of CRC cell lines and tumoroids upon FK866 monotherapy.Cytotoxicity of NAMPT or SIRT1 inhibition either involves activation [10], [55], [56], or has no effect on TP53 [48], [57]. Cell line differences may be one reason for these discrepancies. According to our data in a genetic mouse model, TP53 plays an important role when feedback loop components are deregulated (Mohr et al., in preparation).It was shown that NAMPT and SIRT1 inhibitors induce apoptosis in cancer stem cells which was in part attributed to de-repression of TP53 [58], [59], [60], [61], [62]. According to our data the interference with the c-MYC-NAMPT-DBC1-SIRT1 positive feedback loop additionally leads to down-regulation of c-MYC. In the future, preclinical analyses of NAMPT and SIRT1 inhibitors in Braf and K-ras/Ink4a/Arfmouse models, in patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDTX), or in patient-derived tumor organoid (PDTO) models will allow to determine the therapeutic impact of targeting the feedback loop components in serrated tumors in vivo. As simultaneous targeting of c-MYC and TP53 has recently been shown to eliminate cancer stem cells [63], interference with the loop may have the broader therapeutic potential not only to kill cancer cells, but more importantly in eliminating cancer stem cells.These data together with our previous study [14] indicate, that NAMPT and SIRT1 may represent therapeutic targets in serrated B-Raf or Kras-driven, and also in WNT pathway driven colorectal cancers [46], [64], [65]. Future studies using preclinical models will have to address whether higher vulnerabilities of BRAF-mutant cell lines observed in vitro translates to similar findings in vivo.
Conclusions
Our data from two genetic mouse models support the oncogenic role of c-MYC/NAMPT/DBC1/SIRT1 positive feedback loop. Its direct association with the oncogenic drivers Braf and K-ras points to a contribution of the loop components to murine serrated route tumorigenesis.Vulnerability to NAMPT inhibitor monotherapy or a combined PI3K/SIRT1 inhibitor strategy offered novel therapeutic opportunities for serrated CRCs. The dual therapeutic effect on c-MYC and TP53 has the potential for eliminating cancer stem cells. Our recent studies of entities with deregulated MYC proteins, such as basal cell carcinomas [13], and Wnt pathway-driven conventional CRC [14], as well as our unpublished work on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and a mouse model of lymphomagenesis indicate that targeting the positive feedback loop represents an approach with potential broader applicability in other tumor types beyond BRAF-mutant CRCs. Since several NAMPT inhibitor regimens are currently tested also in cancer clinical trials [52], [66], our findings may have rapid translational impact.
Authors: A L Gartel; X Ye; E Goufman; P Shianov; N Hay; F Najmabadi; A L Tyner Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-03-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: H Ota; E Tokunaga; K Chang; M Hikasa; K Iijima; M Eto; K Kozaki; M Akishita; Y Ouchi; M Kaneki Journal: Oncogene Date: 2006-01-12 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Ole L Dollerup; Britt Christensen; Mads Svart; Mark S Schmidt; Karolina Sulek; Steffen Ringgaard; Hans Stødkilde-Jørgensen; Niels Møller; Charles Brenner; Jonas T Treebak; Niels Jessen Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Antonio Lucena-Cacace; Daniel Otero-Albiol; Manuel P Jiménez-García; Javier Peinado-Serrano; Amancio Carnero Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-08-28
Authors: Alla B Salmina; Ekaterina V Kharitonova; Yana V Gorina; Elena A Teplyashina; Natalia A Malinovskaya; Elena D Khilazheva; Angelina I Mosyagina; Andrey V Morgun; Anton N Shuvaev; Vladimir V Salmin; Olga L Lopatina; Yulia K Komleva Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-04-28 Impact factor: 5.923