BACKGROUND: It is hypothesized that BRAF mutant cancers represent a discrete subset of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) defined by poorer survival. This study investigates whether BRAF mutant CRC is further defined by a distinct pattern of metastatic spread and explores the impact of BRAF mutation and microsatellite instability (MSI) on prognosis in metastatic CRC. METHODS: By using prospective clinical data and molecular analyses from 2 major centers (Royal Melbourne Hospital and The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), patients with known BRAF mutation status were analyzed for clinical characteristics, survival, and metastatic sites. RESULTS: The authors identified 524 metastatic CRC patients where BRAF mutation status was known; 57 (11%) were BRAF mutant tumors. BRAF mutant tumors were significantly associated with right-sided primary tumor, MSI, and poorer survival (median, 10.4 months vs 34.7 months, P < .001). A distinct pattern of metastatic spread was observed in BRAF mutant tumors, namely higher rates of peritoneal metastases (46% vs 24%, P = .001), distant lymph node metastases (53% vs 38%, P = .008), and lower rates of lung metastases (35% vs 49%, P = .049). In additional survival analyses, MSI tumors had significantly poorer survival compared with microsatellite stable tumors (22.1 months vs 11.1 months, P = .017), but this difference was not evident in the BRAF mutant population. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of metastatic spread observed in this study further defines BRAF mutant CRC as a discrete disease subset. The authors demonstrated that, unlikely early stage disease, MSI is associated with poorer survival in metastatic CRC, although this is driven by its association with BRAF mutation.
BACKGROUND: It is hypothesized that BRAF mutant cancers represent a discrete subset of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) defined by poorer survival. This study investigates whether BRAF mutant CRC is further defined by a distinct pattern of metastatic spread and explores the impact of BRAF mutation and microsatellite instability (MSI) on prognosis in metastatic CRC. METHODS: By using prospective clinical data and molecular analyses from 2 major centers (Royal Melbourne Hospital and The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), patients with known BRAF mutation status were analyzed for clinical characteristics, survival, and metastatic sites. RESULTS: The authors identified 524 metastatic CRC patients where BRAF mutation status was known; 57 (11%) were BRAF mutant tumors. BRAF mutant tumors were significantly associated with right-sided primary tumor, MSI, and poorer survival (median, 10.4 months vs 34.7 months, P < .001). A distinct pattern of metastatic spread was observed in BRAF mutant tumors, namely higher rates of peritoneal metastases (46% vs 24%, P = .001), distant lymph node metastases (53% vs 38%, P = .008), and lower rates of lung metastases (35% vs 49%, P = .049). In additional survival analyses, MSI tumors had significantly poorer survival compared with microsatellite stable tumors (22.1 months vs 11.1 months, P = .017), but this difference was not evident in the BRAF mutant population. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of metastatic spread observed in this study further defines BRAF mutant CRC as a discrete disease subset. The authors demonstrated that, unlikely early stage disease, MSI is associated with poorer survival in metastatic CRC, although this is driven by its association with BRAF mutation.
Authors: D J Slamon; B Leyland-Jones; S Shak; H Fuchs; V Paton; A Bajamonde; T Fleming; W Eiermann; J Wolter; M Pegram; J Baselga; L Norton Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-03-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jürgen Weitz; Moritz Koch; Jürgen Debus; Thomas Höhler; Peter R Galle; Markus W Büchler Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Jan 8-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Wade S Samowitz; Carol Sweeney; Jennifer Herrick; Hans Albertsen; Theodore R Levin; Maureen A Murtaugh; Roger K Wolff; Martha L Slattery Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-07-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Christine M Ribic; Daniel J Sargent; Malcolm J Moore; Stephen N Thibodeau; Amy J French; Richard M Goldberg; Stanley R Hamilton; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Robert Gryfe; Lois E Shepherd; Dongsheng Tu; Mark Redston; Steven Gallinger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-07-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Liang Wang; Julie M Cunningham; Jennifer L Winters; Jennifer C Guenther; Amy J French; Lisa A Boardman; Lawrence J Burgart; Shannon K McDonnell; Daniel J Schaid; Stephen N Thibodeau Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-09-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Silvia Benvenuti; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Federica Di Nicolantonio; Carlo Zanon; Mauro Moroni; Silvio Veronese; Salvatore Siena; Alberto Bardelli Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2007-03-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Nancy E Kemeny; Joanne F Chou; Marinela Capanu; Alexandra N Gewirtz; Andrea Cercek; T Peter Kingham; William R Jarnagin; Yuman C Fong; Ronald P DeMatteo; Peter J Allen; Jinru Shia; Celina Ang; Efsevia Vakiani; Michael I D'Angelica Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-08-25 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: J Goldstein; B Tran; J Ensor; P Gibbs; H L Wong; S F Wong; E Vilar; J Tie; R Broaddus; S Kopetz; J Desai; M J Overman Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-02-27 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Rona Yaeger; Elizabeth Cowell; Joanne F Chou; Alexandra N Gewirtz; Laetitia Borsu; Efsevia Vakiani; David B Solit; Neal Rosen; Marinela Capanu; Marc Ladanyi; Nancy Kemeny Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-12-09 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jamaica R Robinson; Polly A Newcomb; Sheetal Hardikar; Stacey A Cohen; Amanda I Phipps Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Muling Mao; Feng Tian; John M Mariadason; Chun C Tsao; Robert Lemos; Farshid Dayyani; Y N Vashisht Gopal; Zhi-Qin Jiang; Ignacio I Wistuba; Xi M Tang; William G Bornman; Gideon Bollag; Gordon B Mills; Garth Powis; Jayesh Desai; Gary E Gallick; Michael A Davies; Scott Kopetz Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-12-18 Impact factor: 12.531