Literature DB >> 31442779

Protein secondary structure prediction using neural networks and deep learning: A review.

Wafaa Wardah1, M G M Khan1, Alok Sharma2, Mahmood A Rashid3.   

Abstract

Literature contains over fifty years of accumulated methods proposed by researchers for predicting the secondary structures of proteins in silico. A large part of this collection is comprised of artificial neural network-based approaches, a field of artificial intelligence and machine learning that is gaining increasing popularity in various application areas. The primary objective of this paper is to put together the summary of works that are important but sparse in time, to help new researchers have a clear view of the domain in a single place. An informative introduction to protein secondary structure and artificial neural networks is also included for context. This review will be valuable in designing future methods to improve protein secondary structure prediction accuracy. The various neural network methods found in this problem domain employ varying architectures and feature spaces, and a handful stand out due to significant improvements in prediction. Neural networks with larger feature scope and higher architecture complexity have been found to produce better protein secondary structure prediction. The current prediction accuracy lies around the 84% marks, leaving much room for further improvement in the prediction of secondary structures in silico. It was found that the estimated limit of 88% prediction accuracy has not been reached yet, hence further research is a timely demand.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Deep learning; Feature selection; Machine learning; Neural network; Protein secondary structure prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31442779     DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2019.107093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Chem        ISSN: 1476-9271            Impact factor:   2.877


  7 in total

1.  Can artificial neural replicators be useful for studying RNA replicators?

Authors:  Alexandr A Ezhov
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 2.574

2.  Protein Science Meets Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and a Biochemical Meta-Analysis of an Inter-Field.

Authors:  Jalil Villalobos-Alva; Luis Ochoa-Toledo; Mario Javier Villalobos-Alva; Atocha Aliseda; Fernando Pérez-Escamirosa; Nelly F Altamirano-Bustamante; Francine Ochoa-Fernández; Ricardo Zamora-Solís; Sebastián Villalobos-Alva; Cristina Revilla-Monsalve; Nicolás Kemper-Valverde; Myriam M Altamirano-Bustamante
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-07-07

3.  Propensities of Some Amino Acid Pairings in α-Helices Vary with Length.

Authors:  Cevdet Nacar
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Predicting Proteolysis in Complex Proteomes Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Matiss Ozols; Alexander Eckersley; Christopher I Platt; Callum Stewart-McGuinness; Sarah A Hibbert; Jerico Revote; Fuyi Li; Christopher E M Griffiths; Rachel E B Watson; Jiangning Song; Mike Bell; Michael J Sherratt
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  While We Wait for a Vaccine Against SARS-CoV-2, Why Not Think About Available Drugs?

Authors:  Francisco J Barrantes
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Enhanced production of alkane hydroxylase from Penicillium chrysogenum SNP5 (MTCC13144) through feed-forward neural network and genetic algorithm.

Authors:  Satyapriy Das; Sangeeta Negi
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.298

7.  ProteinUnet-An efficient alternative to SPIDER3-single for sequence-based prediction of protein secondary structures.

Authors:  Krzysztof Kotowski; Tomasz Smolarczyk; Irena Roterman-Konieczna; Katarzyna Stapor
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.376

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.