Literature DB >> 33803033

Predicting Proteolysis in Complex Proteomes Using Deep Learning.

Matiss Ozols1, Alexander Eckersley1, Christopher I Platt1, Callum Stewart-McGuinness1, Sarah A Hibbert1, Jerico Revote2,3, Fuyi Li4, Christopher E M Griffiths5,6, Rachel E B Watson5,6, Jiangning Song3,7, Mike Bell8, Michael J Sherratt1.   

Abstract

Both protease- and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated proteolysis are thought to be key effectors of tissue remodeling. We have previously shown that comparison of amino acid composition can predict the differential susceptibilities of proteins to photo-oxidation. However, predicting protein susceptibility to endogenous proteases remains challenging. Here, we aim to develop bioinformatics tools to (i) predict cleavage site locations (and hence putative protein susceptibilities) and (ii) compare the predicted vulnerabilities of skin proteins to protease- and ROS-mediated proteolysis. The first goal of this study was to experimentally evaluate the ability of existing protease cleavage site prediction models (PROSPER and DeepCleave) to identify experimentally determined MMP9 cleavage sites in two purified proteins and in a complex human dermal fibroblast-derived extracellular matrix (ECM) proteome. We subsequently developed deep bidirectional recurrent neural network (BRNN) models to predict cleavage sites for 14 tissue proteases. The predictions of the new models were tested against experimental datasets and combined with amino acid composition analysis (to predict ultraviolet radiation (UVR)/ROS susceptibility) in a new web app: the Manchester proteome susceptibility calculator (MPSC). The BRNN models performed better in predicting cleavage sites in native dermal ECM proteins than existing models (DeepCleave and PROSPER), and application of MPSC to the skin proteome suggests that: compared with the elastic fiber network, fibrillar collagens may be susceptible primarily to protease-mediated proteolysis. We also identify additional putative targets of oxidative damage (dermatopontin, fibulins and defensins) and protease action (laminins and nidogen). MPSC has the potential to identify potential targets of proteolysis in disparate tissues and disease states.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; biomarkers; deep-learning; degradomics; extracellular matrix; machine learning; protease; skin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33803033      PMCID: PMC8002881          DOI: 10.3390/ijms22063071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mol Sci        ISSN: 1422-0067            Impact factor:   5.923


  82 in total

1.  Green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate treatment to mouse skin prevents UVB-induced infiltration of leukocytes, depletion of antigen-presenting cells, and oxidative stress.

Authors:  S K Katiyar; H Mukhtar
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.962

2.  The applicability of recurrent neural networks for biological sequence analysis.

Authors:  John Hawkins; Mikael Bodén
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Programming of enzyme specificity by substrate mimetics: investigations on the Glu-specific V8 protease reveals a novel general principle of biocatalysis.

Authors:  N Wehofsky; F Bordusa
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1999-01-25       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 4.  Molecular aspects of skin ageing.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Naylor; Rachel E B Watson; Michael J Sherratt
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Degradation of tropoelastin by matrix metalloproteinases--cleavage site specificities and release of matrikines.

Authors:  Andrea Heinz; Michael C Jung; Laurent Duca; Wolfgang Sippl; Samuel Taddese; Christian Ihling; Anthony Rusciani; Günther Jahreis; Anthony S Weiss; Reinhard H H Neubert; Christian E H Schmelzer
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 5.542

6.  Preparation of Extracellular Matrices Produced by Cultured and Primary Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Janusz Franco-Barraza; Dorothy A Beacham; Michael D Amatangelo; Edna Cukierman
Journal:  Curr Protoc Cell Biol       Date:  2016-06-01

7.  Basis for substrate recognition and distinction by matrix metalloproteinases.

Authors:  Boris I Ratnikov; Piotr Cieplak; Kosi Gramatikoff; James Pierce; Alexey Eroshkin; Yoshinobu Igarashi; Marat Kazanov; Qing Sun; Adam Godzik; Andrei Osterman; Boguslaw Stec; Alex Strongin; Jeffrey W Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Matrix metalloproteinases - From the cleavage data to the prediction tools and beyond.

Authors:  Piotr Cieplak; Alex Y Strongin
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Proteotoxic stress and ageing triggers the loss of redox homeostasis across cellular compartments.

Authors:  Janine Kirstein; Daisuke Morito; Taichi Kakihana; Munechika Sugihara; Anita Minnen; Mark S Hipp; Carmen Nussbaum-Krammer; Prasad Kasturi; F Ulrich Hartl; Kazuhiro Nagata; Richard I Morimoto
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Measurement of matrix metalloproteinase 9-mediated collagen type III degradation fragment as a marker of skin fibrosis.

Authors:  Efstathios Vassiliadis; Sanne Skovgård Veidal; Natasha Barascuk; Jhinuk Basu Mullick; Rikke Elgaard Clausen; Lise Larsen; Henrik Simonsen; Dorthe Vang Larsen; Anne-Christine Bay-Jensen; Toni Segovia-Silvestre; Diana Julie Leeming; Morten A Karsdal
Journal:  BMC Dermatol       Date:  2011-03-29
View more
  1 in total

1.  Integrating knowledge of protein sequence with protein function for the prediction and validation of new MALT1 substrates.

Authors:  Peter A Bell; Sophia Scheuermann; Florian Renner; Christina L Pan; Henry Y Lu; Stuart E Turvey; Frédéric Bornancin; Catherine H Régnier; Christopher M Overall
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 6.155

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.