Literature DB >> 36169766

Propensities of Some Amino Acid Pairings in α-Helices Vary with Length.

Cevdet Nacar1.   

Abstract

The results of secondary structure prediction methods are widely used in applications in biotechnology and bioinformatics. However, the accuracy limit of these methods could be improved up to 92%. One approach to achieve this goal is to harvest information from the primary structure of the peptide. This study aims to contribute to this goal by investigating the variations in propensity of amino acid pairings to α-helices in globular proteins depending on helix length. (n):(n + 4) residue pairings were determined using a comprehensive peptide data set according to backbone hydrogen bond criterion which states that backbone hydrogen bond is the dominant driving force of protein folding. Helix length is limited to 13 to 26 residues. Findings of this study show that propensities of ALA:GLY and GLY:GLU pairings to α-helix in globular protein increase with increasing helix length but of ALA:ALA and ALA:VAL decrease. While the frequencies of ILE:ALA, LEU:ALA, LEU:GLN, LEU:GLU, LEU:LEU, MET:ILE and VAL:LEU pairings remain roughly constant with length, the 25 residue pairings have varying propensities in narrow helix lengths. The remaining pairings have no prominent propensity to α-helices.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Helix stability; Residue pairing; Residue propensity; Secondary structure prediction

Year:  2022        PMID: 36169766     DOI: 10.1007/s10930-022-10076-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein J        ISSN: 1572-3887            Impact factor:   4.000


  57 in total

1.  Improved performance in protein secondary structure prediction by inhomogeneous score combination.

Authors:  Y Guermeur; C Geourjon; P Gallinari; G Deléage
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Knowledge-based protein secondary structure assignment.

Authors:  D Frishman; P Argos
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1995-12

3.  GOR method for predicting protein secondary structure from amino acid sequence.

Authors:  J Garnier; J F Gibrat; B Robson
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.600

4.  SOPMA: significant improvements in protein secondary structure prediction by consensus prediction from multiple alignments.

Authors:  C Geourjon; G Deléage
Journal:  Comput Appl Biosci       Date:  1995-12

5.  Identification and application of the concepts important for accurate and reliable protein secondary structure prediction.

Authors:  R D King; M J Sternberg
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Further developments of protein secondary structure prediction using information theory. New parameters and consideration of residue pairs.

Authors:  J F Gibrat; J Garnier; B Robson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1987-12-05       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  An algorithm for protein secondary structure prediction based on class prediction.

Authors:  G Deléage; B Roux
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1987 Aug-Sep

8.  An algorithm for secondary structure determination in proteins based on sequence similarity.

Authors:  J M Levin; B Robson; J Garnier
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1986-09-15       Impact factor: 4.124

9.  Prediction of protein conformation.

Authors:  P Y Chou; G D Fasman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1974-01-15       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Combining evolutionary information and neural networks to predict protein secondary structure.

Authors:  B Rost; C Sander
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1994-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.