Literature DB >> 31440652

Posterior fusion of the occipital axis in children with upper cervical disorder using both C2 pedicle and laminar screws (C2 hybrid screws).

Kenyu Ito1, Shiro Imagama1, Kei Ando1, Kazuyoshi Kobayashi1, Mikito Tsushima1, Akiyuki Matsumoto1, Masayoshi Morozumi1, Satoshi Tanaka1, Masaaki Machino1, Yoshihiro Nishida1, Naoki Ishiguro1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: An occipital-cervical surgery for children is challenging for surgeons because of the immature bone quality, extensive anatomical variability, and small osseous structures. Furthermore, occipital-C2 fusion in children results in great stress on the C2 screws. We report a technique that uses both C2 pedicle and bilateral lateral mass screws (C2 hybrid screws) in children with an upper cervical disorder to preserve motion segment and secure strength in those who require occipital-cervical fusion. CASE REPORT: Case 1 was that of a 5-year-old girl with Down syndrome who had atlantoaxial dislocation and os odontoideum. Owing to the C1 hypoplasia, the posterior arch was fractured by the C1 lateral mass screw. Therefore, O-C2 fusion was performed. C2 bilateral lamina screws were added along with the C2 bilateral pedicle screws for reinforcement. Case 2 was that of an 8-year-old boy who presented with torticollis and neck pain. The patient was diagnosed as having atlantoaxial rotatory fixation. The right vertebral artery was obstructed, and the left vertebral artery was dominant. The C1 posterior arch was bifid and assimilated with the occipital bone. C2 bilateral lamina screws were added with the right C2 pedicle screw for reinforcement. Both cases attained bone union after O-C2 fusion surgery using hybrid screws.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of C2 hybrid screws with both C2 pedicle and bilateral lateral mass screws can preserve mobile segments in the fusion area in young children who require occipital-cervical fixation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical; children; fusion; hybrid; laminar screw; occipital; pedicle screw

Year:  2018        PMID: 31440652      PMCID: PMC6698545          DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2017-0033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res        ISSN: 2432-261X


Introduction

Recently, cervical fusion and occipito-cervical fusion have been performed for children owing to the development in implant devices[1-4]). However, upper cervical fixation is considered difficult for children due to the thin lamina and narrow pedicle. Furthermore, occipital-C2 fusion in children results in great stress on the C2 screws. Several reports have described the use of a C2 laminar screw (LS) without a pedicle screw (PS) for occipital-cervical fusion in pediatric patients[5-7]). However, the fusion area expands to C3 or more caudally. To preserve a motion segment and secure strength in pediatric patients who need occipital-cervical fusion, the use of both PSs and bilateral LSs may help. Here we report a technique that uses both PSs and bilateral LSs (C2 hybrid screws) in children with an upper cervical disorder.

Case presentation

Surgical technique

All patients wore a halo-vest for a few days preoperatively to improve cervical alignment. Under general anesthesia, the patients were placed in the prone position, and the dorsal portion of the halo-vest was removed. The C2 PS was inserted under cone-beam computed tomography (CT) with navigation and if the C2 PS strength was weak, bilateral C2 LSs were added for reinforcement and inserted using the Wright technique[8]). Offset rods were used to connect the C2 LS and O-C2 PS rods (Fig. 1).
Figure 1.

A model of occipital-C2 hybrid screw using both pedicle (white arrows) and laminar screws (black arrows). Posterior (A), cranial (B), and lateral (C) view.

The occipital plate and C2 pedicle screws were connected using rods.

Offset rods were used to connect the C2 lateral mass screw and the rods.

A model of occipital-C2 hybrid screw using both pedicle (white arrows) and laminar screws (black arrows). Posterior (A), cranial (B), and lateral (C) view. The occipital plate and C2 pedicle screws were connected using rods. Offset rods were used to connect the C2 lateral mass screw and the rods.

Case 1

A 5-year-old girl with Down syndrome had gait disturbance. Her height was 97.5 cm (-2.7 SD) and weight was 13 kg (-2 SD). CT scans showed os odontoideum and irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation. Owing to hypoplasty of C1 and spinal bifida of the C1 posterior arch, occipital-C2 fusion using PS was performed with a monocortical structural iliac bone graft. Recurring fever and occipital screw backout was postoperatively observed. One month after removal, the separate-type occipital plate was replaced with a central-type plate reinforced with a soft wire. To match the strength of the reinforced occipital screws, the expansion of the cervical fusion area was considered. However, to preserve the motion segment, C2 hybrid screws were used. The 3.5-mm C2 PSs were replaced with 4.0-mm screws. C2 LSs, 3.5 mm and 20 mm long for both the laminae, were added for reinforcement. A halo-vest was used at postoperative 3 months, and no gait disturbance was observed. Bone union was confirmed during follow-up examinations (Fig. 2).
Figure 2.

Case 1: 5-year-old girl with Down syndrome.

(A) Preoperatively, CT demonstrated atlantoaxial dislocation, os odontoideum, atlas-dens interval (ADI) of 8.8 mm, and space available for spinal cord (SAC) of 7.0 mm.

(B) MRI suggested high intensity change in the spinal cord on the T2 weighed at the cervicomedullary junction.

(C, D) Postoperatively, X-ray imaging revealed O-C2 hybrid fusion.

(E) On follow-up CT, bone union was confirmed.

(F) Anterior view of 3D constructed CT demonstrates the bilateral C2 pedicle screws and C2 laminar screws.

Case 1: 5-year-old girl with Down syndrome. (A) Preoperatively, CT demonstrated atlantoaxial dislocation, os odontoideum, atlas-dens interval (ADI) of 8.8 mm, and space available for spinal cord (SAC) of 7.0 mm. (B) MRI suggested high intensity change in the spinal cord on the T2 weighed at the cervicomedullary junction. (C, D) Postoperatively, X-ray imaging revealed O-C2 hybrid fusion. (E) On follow-up CT, bone union was confirmed. (F) Anterior view of 3D constructed CT demonstrates the bilateral C2 pedicle screws and C2 laminar screws.

Case 2

An 8-year-old boy presented with atlantoaxial rotatory fixation (AARF) with torticollis and neck pain. His height was 128.5 cm (-0.6 SD) and weight was 23.7 kg (-1 SD). Although the patient was treated with a neck collar, Glisson neck traction, and halo-vest for 5 months, he did not recover. The C1 posterior arch was bifid and assimilated with the occipital bone. The left, narrow C2 pedicle and right vertebral artery obstruction required the avoidance of insertion of the left C2 PS. A surgery was planned to insert the right C2 PS and both LSs. The 3.5-mm and 20-mm long right C2 PS, 3.5-mm and 20-mm long left LS, and 3.5-mm and 28-mm long right LS were inserted. The occipital and hybrid C2 screws were connected with an iliac bone autograft. A halo-vest was used at postoperative 3 months. Bone union was confirmed during follow-up examinations (Fig. 3).
Figure 3.

Case 2: 8-year-old boy with atlantoaxial rotatory fixation.

(A) X-ray imaging revealed torticollis.

(B, C) 3D CT demonstrated the assimilation of C1 bifida and C1 right posterior arch with the occipital bone. Right vertebral artery was obstructed, and left vertebral artery was dominant.

(D, E) Postoperatively, X-ray imaging revealed O-C2 hybrid fusion.

Case 2: 8-year-old boy with atlantoaxial rotatory fixation. (A) X-ray imaging revealed torticollis. (B, C) 3D CT demonstrated the assimilation of C1 bifida and C1 right posterior arch with the occipital bone. Right vertebral artery was obstructed, and left vertebral artery was dominant. (D, E) Postoperatively, X-ray imaging revealed O-C2 hybrid fusion.

Discussion

Occipital and cervical surgeries for children are challenging for surgeons because of immature bone quality and small osseous structures[9-15]). When C1 shows hypoplasty, it should be skipped, and the lower instrumented vertebra should be considered as C2. In this situation, C2 screws receive the weight of the occipital bone so that the lower instrumented vertebra can be extended to C3 or below. To preserve motion segment and ensure sufficient strength in pediatric patients who require occipital-C2 fusion, C2 hybrid screws are used, as in our cases. C2 lamina is the largest cervical lamina, which allows the use of various trajectories of C2 LS, whereas the use of C2 PS is technically challenging[8]). Therefore, a trajectory of C2 LS is adjusted with the ideal insertion of C2 PS. One of the concerns when using a C2 hybrid screw is the limited contact area for bone grafting. In our cases, the bone graft was shaved to avoid the head of the C2 LS, and good contact was obtained. Finally, bone union was confirmed in both cases and the symptoms improved. In conclusion, C2 hybrid screws save mobile segments within the fusion area in pediatric patients who require an occipital-cervical fixation.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
  15 in total

1.  Posterior C2 fixation using bilateral, crossing C2 laminar screws: case series and technical note.

Authors:  Neill M Wright
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2004-04

2.  Bone mass in young adults with Down syndrome.

Authors:  M Guijarro; C Valero; B Paule; J Gonzalez-Macias; J A Riancho
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2008-03

3.  Safety of cervical pedicle screw insertion in children: a clinicoradiological evaluation of computer-assisted insertion of 51 cervical pedicle screws including 28 subaxial pedicle screws in 16 children.

Authors:  S Rajasekaran; P Rishi Mugesh Kanna; Ajoy Prasad Shetty
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Outcomes of instrumented fusion in the pediatric cervical spine.

Authors:  Steven W Hwang; Loyola V Gressot; Leonardo Rangel-Castilla; William E Whitehead; Daniel J Curry; Robert J Bollo; Thomas G Luerssen; Andrew Jea
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-09-21

5.  Low bone turnover and low bone density in a cohort of adults with Down syndrome.

Authors:  K D McKelvey; T W Fowler; N S Akel; J A Kelsay; D Gaddy; G R Wenger; L J Suva
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Treatment of pediatric atlantoaxial instability with traditional and modified Goel-Harms fusion constructs.

Authors:  Gregory G Heuer; Douglas A Hardesty; Deb A Bhowmick; Robert Bailey; Suresh N Magge; Phillip B Storm
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Computed tomography morphometric analysis for axial and subaxial translaminar screw placement in the pediatric cervical spine.

Authors:  Joshua J Chern; Roukoz B Chamoun; William E Whitehead; Daniel J Curry; Thomas G Luerssen; Andrew Jea
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Modern cervical spine instrumentation in children.

Authors:  Daniel Hedequist; Timothy Hresko; Mark Proctor
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Hypoplastic posterior arch of C-1 in children with Down syndrome: a double jeopardy.

Authors:  V Martich; T Ben-Ami; D K Yousefzadeh; N J Roizen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Use of axial and subaxial translaminar screw fixation in the management of upper cervical spinal instability in a series of 7 children.

Authors:  Roukoz B Chamoun; Katherine M Relyea; Keyne K Johnson; William E Whitehead; Daniel J Curry; Thomas G Luerssen; James M Drake; Andrew Jea
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.654

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.